Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$78.49
▼ $1.41 (-1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 09:02 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$4.32B
Day Range
$77.84 - $81.92
52-Week Range
$40.16 - $185.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
17.11.2026
Support
$47.59
Resistance
$96.80
WIX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-57.2% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 5/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
14d ago · $75.97
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 32 to 5 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 27, 2026
Then
80
$82.29
Now
58
$78.49
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
57
Risk
34
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
32
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Wix.com Ltd. highlights its strong stock performance, surging **60% in August** and **34.3% since its last earnings report**, driven by investor optimism. The company is positioning itself as a leader in AI-driven website creation, notably through its **collaboration with Google Gemini**, allowing users to build sites via natural-language tools. However, legal scrutiny has emerged, with **class-action lawsuits questioning past AI-related disclosures**, adding uncertainty. Analysts and funds like Baron Capital also note Wix’s growth potential amid broader market gains.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Wix.com Ltd.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
17
Fundamentals
—
Technical
57
Valuation
—
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+85%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for WIX suggests **panic selling** as the dominant psychological state, driven by negative momentum and heightened volatility. The neutral RSI and sentiment further indicate caution rather than euphoria or FOMO. The narrative gap (-17) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and reality, possibly reinforcing risk-off behavior. The key question is whether the selling pressure will persist or if a rebound emerges from current support levels.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:56 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Google Gemini Integration and AI Lawsuits Could Be A Game Changer For Wix.com (WIX)"
"Wix.com (WIX) reported earnings 30 days ago... stock up 34.3%"
"60.6% 1-month share price return suggesting short-term momentum is rebuilding"
"Wix Harmony website creation tools directly inside Gemini... natural-language interactions"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 73/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for WIX show a stark divide between those who see relative opportunity in its technical or cyclical positioning and those who flag it as risky or overvalued. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both rate it highly—Nelson sees it as oversold in its cycle, while Mackay detects no crowd-driven mania—but Howard Marks (both cycle and general) remains cautiously optimistic, suggesting it’s still early in its growth trajectory. In contrast, the more conservative or risk-averse frameworks—like Loeb, Veblen, and Housel—pile on red flags, with Loeb and Veblen warning of excessive risk or speculative growth motives, while Housel’s near-zero score reflects its volatility as a potential psychological trap. Meanwhile, the fundamentalists (Graham, Fisher, Lynch) and dividend-focused (Smith) methodologies lack sufficient data to form a clear verdict, leaving their models neutral, while the efficient-market camp dismisses it outright as a suboptimal choice compared to passive indexing.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 69
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Motley Fool · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Wix.com Ltd. (WIX) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for WIX specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
WIX's technical score is 57/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 52.2 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.0% of price; Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -5.9% / max drawdown 83.6%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for WIX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zohar Nir | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 376 | -376 | $95.00 |
| Abrahami Avishai | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 654 | -654 | $95.00 |
| Abrahami Avishai | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 55 | -55 | $95.00 |
| Shemesh Lior | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 456 | -456 | $95.00 |
| Zohar Nir | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 271 | -271 | $95.00 |
| Shai Omer | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 490 | -490 | $95.00 |
| Even-Haim Yaniv | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 320 | -320 | $95.00 |
| Meyer Shelly B | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 479 | -479 | $95.00 |
| Shai Omer | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 490 | +490 | $59.89 |
| Zohar Nir | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 271 | +271 | $59.89 |
| Zohar Nir | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 376 | +376 | $59.89 |
| Shemesh Lior | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 456 | +456 | $59.89 |
| Abrahami Avishai | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 55 | +55 | $59.89 |
| Abrahami Avishai | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 654 | +654 | $59.89 |
| Even-Haim Yaniv | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 320 | +320 | $59.89 |
| Meyer Shelly B | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 479 | +479 | $59.89 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 21,080 | -269 | $86.51 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 16,475 | -704 | $85.08 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 17,179 | -3,901 | $85.93 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 15,631 | -844 | $83.00 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 269 | -269 | $86.51 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 844 | -844 | $83.00 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 704 | -704 | $85.08 |
| Gutler Ron | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 3,901 | -3,901 | $85.93 |
| Zohar Nir | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 567,944 | -15,283 | $85.92 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,937,799 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,721,172 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology