Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$413.28
▲ $0.75 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:05 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$118.99B
Day Range
$409.15 - $416.66
52-Week Range
$155.29 - $416.66
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$274.81
Resistance
$416.66
VLO is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+152.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -5.5%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
85
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
49
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING VLO...
Recent media coverage of Valero Energy has centered on its strong stock performance and valuation debates. Analysts highlight Valero’s **7x return over five years**, driven by robust refining margins and tight fuel markets, though concerns persist about whether the stock remains overvalued. The company’s Gulf Coast refining advantages and diesel scarcity in Q2 were noted as key positives, though earnings volatility remains a risk. Broader energy sector gains also contributed to its visibility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Valero Energy. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
70
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
49
Technical
85
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+75%
Market Narrative
81
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+39
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring suggests traders are fixating on the near-term resistance level, despite euphoric momentum and extreme sentiment. Overconfidence and confirmation bias—driven by a widening narrative gap—may amplify this fixation, as fundamentals lag price performance. The key question is whether traders will break free from resistance or double down, given the disconnect between price action and fundamentals. Herding remains muted, but FOMO and euphoria could escalate if momentum sustains.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:42 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"tight product market can help underpin cash flow (article 4)"
"Valero's Gulf Coast refining system and export access provide a structural advantage (article 6)"
"shares are not cheap on recent numbers (article 4)"
"earnings are highly sensitive (article 6)"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: the bullish traders who see clear momentum or long-term potential versus the cautious or bearish investors who spot red flags. Jesse Livermore’s high score reflects his focus on price action trends, while Edgar Lawrence Smith and Gerald Loeb’s moderate positivity aligns with their buy-and-hold or patient capital approaches. In contrast, the majority of value-oriented investors—from Benjamin Graham to Howard Marks—flag concerns like valuation, risk, or market cycle positioning, with Graham’s strict criteria and Marks’ late-cycle caution standing out. Meanwhile, behavioral economists like Charles Mackay and Samuel Nelson see signs of speculative overreach, while growth-focused investors like Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher dismiss it outright for lacking their signature traits. The divide underscores whether the stock’s strength lies in its trend or momentum (for traders) or whether its risks—valuation, cycle, or speculative excess—make it a poor fit for disciplined, long-term, or value-driven strategies.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 85
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 66
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 53
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 35
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 26
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 20
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 8
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 1
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
4.4%
Operating Margin
2.6%
Net Margin
1.9%
EBITDA Margin
5.2%
ROE
9.9%
ROA
4.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.57
Cash
$4.69B
Total Debt
$9.21B
Current Ratio
1.65
Debt/Equity
0.39
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.7.2026 | $1.200 |
| 30.7.2026 | $1.200 |
| 21.5.2026 | $1.200 |
| 20.5.2026 | $1.200 |
| 5.2.2026 | $1.200 |
| 4.2.2026 | $1.200 |
| 20.11.2025 | $1.130 |
| 19.11.2025 | $1.130 |
| 31.7.2025 | $1.130 |
| 30.7.2025 | $1.130 |
| 20.5.2025 | $1.130 |
| 19.5.2025 | $1.130 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$76.78
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$75.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Valero Energy (VLO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VLO currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
VLO's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.39; Current ratio: 1.65.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -5.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -11.8%; Net income growth: -15.2%.
Yes — VLO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walsh Richard Joe | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 97,091 | -3,104 | — |
| Walsh Richard Joe | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 3,104 | -3,104 | — |
| Fisher Eric A | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $268.17 |
| Fisher Eric A | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $236.90 |
| Fisher Eric A | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 27,242 | -7,500 | $236.90 |
| Fisher Eric A | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $251.61 |
| Fisher Eric A | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 34,742 | -7,500 | $251.61 |
| Diaz Fred M | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Greene Kimberly S, | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| EBERHART PAULETT | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Ffolkes Marie A | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Reymond Robert L | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Majoras Deborah P | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| WILKINS RAYFORD JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Mullins Eric D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| WEISENBURGER RANDALL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| WEISENBURGER RANDALL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Reymond Robert L | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| EBERHART PAULETT | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Ffolkes Marie A | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Greene Kimberly S, | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Diaz Fred M | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Majoras Deborah P | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| Mullins Eric D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
| WILKINS RAYFORD JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 939 | +939 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,896,297 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,101,692 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology