Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$223.60
▲ $4.36 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:19 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$25.16B
Day Range
$219.39 - $227.80
52-Week Range
$66.30 - $319.94
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$185.07
Resistance
$277.88
TSEM is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+225.0% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.26 (3y annualized return 103.7% / max drawdown 45.8%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $223.60
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 55 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $191.12
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 4 to 29 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 19, 2026
Then
70
$223.60
Now
70
$223.60
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
62
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. has centered on its strategic shift toward silicon photonics, particularly its growing revenue from AI-related optical content, which now accounts for nearly half of its total. Analysts have responded positively, with Stifel initiating coverage with a **Buy rating** and a $270 price target, while another source noted an upward revision to its 2028 net income forecast. However, concerns persist over the lack of concrete updates on customer reservations or capital expenditure plans, leading to a **Hold rating** from another analyst. The company’s expansion into Japan and its role in AI infrastructure were also highlighted as key themes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Tower Semiconductor Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
49
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
—
Technical
62
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
79
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TSEM’s psychology score (19) reflects a fragmented, detached market mood—euphoria persists despite technical weakness, evidenced by perfect news sentiment (100/100) and a 12-point narrative gap. The lack of volatility (0.70x ATR) and neutral RSI (48) contradicts panic, while FOMO’s presence hints at speculative interest despite weak momentum (-1.8% ROC). The key question is whether detached optimism (euphoria) will sustain or collapse under further underperformance relative to peers. Anchoring may reinforce holding patterns despite overvaluation signals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:27 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Stifel analyst Sahej Singh initiates coverage on Tower Semiconductor with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $270"
"Tower Semiconductor is rapidly transforming into a silicon photonics leader, now driving nearly half its revenue from AI optical content"
"Tower Semiconductor Sinks 10% as AI Spending Fears Hit Foundries"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 67/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each methodology, the model estimates that the scores for TSEM span a wide range—from Mackay’s relatively upbeat 74, suggesting no obvious crowd mania, down to Housel’s zero, flagging volatility that could shake patient holders. Investors attuned to market cycles and risk, such as Marks, Nelson and Loeb, assign middling to low scores, reflecting concerns about cycle position and capital threats. Value‑oriented and growth‑focused frameworks like Graham, Fisher, Lynch and Bagehot sit at a neutral 50 because the available data is insufficient for a decisive read. Conversely, more contrarian or technical analysts such as Livermore, Veblen and Schwager issue negative or unclear signals, pulling the overall debate toward caution.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 67
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 45
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 18
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TSEM specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TSEM's technical score is 62/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.26 (3y annualized return 103.7% / max drawdown 45.8%); Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.1% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; -24.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TSEM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 2,098 | -2,098 | $252.74 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 2,489 | -2,489 | $253.92 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 3,331 | -3,331 | $250.90 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 15,816 | -15,816 | $249.66 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 35,208 | -35,208 | $248.78 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 23,028 | -23,028 | $248.08 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 5,065 | -5,065 | $246.74 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 2,507 | -2,507 | $244.69 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 11,624 | -11,624 | $245.78 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 3,060 | -3,060 | $243.32 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 625,447 | -2,507 | $244.69 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 627,954 | -3,060 | $243.32 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 613,823 | -11,624 | $245.78 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 608,758 | -5,065 | $246.74 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 585,730 | -23,028 | $248.08 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 526,788 | -2,489 | $253.92 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 529,277 | -2,098 | $252.74 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 550,522 | -35,208 | $248.78 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 534,706 | -15,816 | $249.66 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 531,375 | -3,331 | $250.90 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,827 | -1,827 | $263.78 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 5,316 | -5,316 | $261.03 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,471 | -1,471 | $262.16 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 2,519 | -2,519 | $259.94 |
| Ellwanger Russell Craig | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 6,486 | -6,486 | $258.47 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,521,750 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,464,837 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology