Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.60
▼ $0.21 (-5.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:10 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$1.21B
Day Range
$3.59 - $3.73
52-Week Range
$2.84 - $5.71
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$3.52
Resistance
$5.66
TBLA is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+4.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1400.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Death Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
11
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
43
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) has focused on its financial and market outlook, with a notable upgrade to a **"Buy"** rating by Zacks Investment Research on August 24, citing optimism over its earnings potential. Analysts highlight the company’s competitive advantages, such as profitability and reinvestment capacity, though broader financial lists often mention Taboola alongside other stocks under $10 with growth potential or mixed market sentiment. No company-specific operational or product updates were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Taboola.com Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
43
Technical
11
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (71) reflects a market behavior consistent with a prolonged drawdown (-19.2% over three months) and muted trading activity (0.69x average volume). While positive sentiment (100/100) and momentum (+3.7% ROC) suggest residual optimism, the gap between narrative (68) and reality (41) implies investors may be clinging to gains despite underperformance. The key question is whether the subdued volume signals hesitation to exit or a delayed reaction to recent declines. Herding and overconfidence are absent, reinforcing a cautious, risk-averse stance. The narrative-reality gap may widen if fundamentals diverge further from market expectations.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:18 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Taboola.com (TBLA) has been upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), reflecting growing optimism about the company's earnings prospects."
"Companies with solid operating margins have a competitive edge, allowing them to reinvest for sustainable expansion."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 2/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TBLA reflects deep methodological disagreements about valuation, risk, and market psychology. Peter Lynch and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) see it as a high-potential growth play, with Lynch emphasizing undervaluation relative to future earnings and Marks noting it’s not yet overextended in the cycle. Meanwhile, Graham’s strict defensive criteria and Loeb’s risk aversion dismiss it outright, while Fisher and the Efficient Market proponents question whether the stock’s fundamentals or market inefficiencies justify active selection. The middle ground—Schwager’s disciplined setup, Mackay’s lack of mania, and Nelson’s mid-cycle neutrality—suggests it’s a speculative bet with mixed signals, but not a clear-cut buy or sell for most frameworks.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 85
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 39
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 19
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 2
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
29.8%
Operating Margin
2.3%
Net Margin
2.2%
EBITDA Margin
3.8%
ROE
4.7%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.14
Cash
$120.86M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.07
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 8 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
StockStory · 14.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TBLA currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
TBLA's technical score is 11/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1400.0%; Net income growth: 1224.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; ATR: 4.2% of price; Calmar: -0.01 (3y annualized return -0.3% / max drawdown 47.8%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TBLA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sundjaja Kristy | Gift | 17.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Walker Stephen C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 113,073 | -113,073 | $4.05 |
| Sundjaja Kristy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 50,415 | -50,415 | $4.05 |
| Singolda Adam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 251,129 | -251,129 | $4.05 |
| Sundjaja Kristy | Gift | 14.8.2026 | 3,738 | -3,738 | — |
| Shachar Erez | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 38,046 | +38,046 | — |
| Peres Nechemia Jacob | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 38,046 | +38,046 | — |
| LIMON ZVI | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 38,046 | +38,046 | — |
| Shany Gilad | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 38,046 | +38,046 | — |
| Mijaleski Monica | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 38,046 | +38,046 | — |
| Shachar Erez | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 256,873 | +38,046 | — |
| LIMON ZVI | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 283,873 | +38,046 | — |
| Mijaleski Monica | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 159,600 | +38,046 | — |
| Shany Gilad | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 301,878 | +38,046 | — |
| Peres Nechemia Jacob | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 283,873 | +38,046 | — |
| Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 12,000,000 | -12,000,000 | $4.40 |
| Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 12,000,000 | -12,000,000 | $4.40 |
| Apollo Management, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 18,039,644 | -12,000,000 | $4.40 |
| Apollo Management GP, LLC | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 18,039,644 | -12,000,000 | $4.40 |
| Singolda Adam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 251,130 | -251,130 | $4.99 |
| Walker Stephen C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 113,071 | -113,071 | $4.99 |
| Sundjaja Kristy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 50,416 | -50,416 | $4.99 |
| Sundjaja Kristy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 1,490,942 | -50,416 | $4.99 |
| Singolda Adam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 17,709,241 | -251,130 | $4.99 |
| Walker Stephen C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 3,160,434 | -113,071 | $4.99 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,965,336 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,905,478 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology