Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$43.27
▼ $0.47 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:21 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.61B
Day Range
$43.21 - $43.71
52-Week Range
$39.17 - $76.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
17.11.2026
Support
$42.77
Resistance
$70.75
NYAX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-9.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 700.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $17.32 vs. price $43.27 (-60.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (60/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $46.03
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 10 to 41 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
50
Value
33
Momentum
9
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
59
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Nayax Ltd.** has centered on its **$350 million cash acquisition of IPS Group**, a smart parking solutions firm, which has driven share price increases and sparked debate over valuation and synergies. Additionally, headlines highlight **CEO Yair Nechmad exercising stock options worth over $4 million**, raising attention to insider activity. Analysts discuss whether the deal aligns with Nayax’s growth strategy and whether projected synergies justify the premium paid.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Nayax Ltd.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
59
Technical
9
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-34%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (72) reflects a reluctance to accept further losses after a 19.6% drop over three months, despite subdued volume. Meanwhile, **Euphoria** (39) and **Overconfidence** (47) coexist due to extreme valuation (+195% vs. DCF) and momentum decoupling from fundamentals. The **narrative-reality gap** (37) suggests traders may be overestimating positive catalysts. The key question: Will traders prioritize loss avoidance or embrace valuation correction? **FOMO** (25) remains muted, as neutral RSI and moderate volume limit urgency.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:59 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Yair Nechmad, CEO at Nayax, executed a significant transaction involving the exercise of company stock options worth $4.32M"
"Nayax Ltd. acquires Smart Parking Firm In $350 Million Cash Deal"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Peter Lynch’s high score (86) suggesting it’s a compelling growth candidate whose price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, while the opposite end of the spectrum—where Morgan Housel (0) and Philip Fisher (8) dismiss it outright—highlights deep disagreements over stability and volatility. Growth-focused investors like Lynch and Jack Schwager (67) see favorable reward/risk dynamics, even as Howard Marks’ cycle analysis (74) flags it as early-to-mid cycle, avoiding the extremes. Meanwhile, value-oriented schools like Benjamin Graham (13) and Gerald Loeb (34) reject it for risk or valuation concerns, while crowd psychology signals from Charles Mackay (60) and Thorstein Veblen (36) hint at speculative enthusiasm. The contrast underscores whether this stock is a disciplined opportunity for contrarians or a volatile bet for impatient investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 72
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 56
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 13
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 8
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 8
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
48.2%
Operating Margin
9.4%
Net Margin
8.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.4%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.96
Cash
$319.54M
Total Debt
$319.60M
Current Ratio
2.26
Debt/Equity
1.46
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$43.27
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$17.32
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-60.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $38.45M | $35.28M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $41.58M | $35.00M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $44.18M | $34.11M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $46.11M | $32.67M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $47.26M | $30.72M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$34.96M
Terminal Value
$745.31M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$484.40M
Enterprise Value
$652.18M
Net Debt
$64.00K
Equity Value
$652.11M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.19
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.81
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
MarketBeat · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Business Wire · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Nayax Ltd. (NYAX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NYAX currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NYAX's estimated fair value is $17.32, which is 60.0% below the current price of $43.27. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NYAX's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 700.6%; Net income growth: 730.7%; Current ratio: 2.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $17.32 vs. price $43.27 (-60.0%); ATR: 4.8% of price; Free cash flow growth: -12.2%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NYAX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tepper Oren | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 65 | -65 | $51.81 |
| Sever Michal | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 34 | -34 | $52.31 |
| Furman Carly Lisanne | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 96 | -96 | $52.31 |
| Manor Sagit | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 123 | -123 | $52.39 |
| Greenberg Aaron Samuel | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 77 | -77 | $52.31 |
| Sever Michal | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 17,233 | -38 | $52.98 |
| Sever Michal | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 38 | -38 | $52.98 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 0 | -75,000 | — |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 7,168,442 | +75,000 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 7,329,047 | +15,605 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 7,313,442 | +70,000 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 7,243,442 | +75,000 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 15,605 | +15,605 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 70,000 | -70,000 | — |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 70,000 | +70,000 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | $33.71 |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 15,605 | -15,605 | — |
| Nechmad Yair | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Havshush Eran | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 20 | -20 | $52.61 |
| Greenberg Aaron Samuel | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 221 | -221 | $69.23 |
| Greenberg Aaron Samuel | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 55 | -55 | $68.20 |
| Greenberg Aaron Samuel | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 25,500 | -55 | $68.20 |
| Greenberg Aaron Samuel | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 25,279 | -221 | $69.23 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
66,830 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 29,731 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology