Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$17.49
▲ $0.28 (+1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$16.88 - $17.62
52-Week Range
$7.67 - $27.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$10.53
Resistance
$17.90
NTSK is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-23.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 31.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $1.81 vs. price $17.49 (-89.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $17.00
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 78)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $17.00
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 20 to 70 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
92
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
35
Institutional
67
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Netskope, Inc. has centered on its strong financial performance and strategic positioning in the AI-driven cybersecurity market. Analysts, including RBC Capital and Morgan Stanley, have raised price targets and maintained optimistic ratings, citing robust Q2 earnings that exceeded expectations and highlighting Netskope’s AI security pipeline as a key growth driver. The company’s ability to capitalize on AI trends amid competition from larger players like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks has been emphasized as a major focus.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Netskope, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
62
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
34
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
35
Technical
92
Valuation
38
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+90%
Market Narrative
91
Fundamental Reality
34
Narrative Gap
+57
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers rather than fundamentals, despite extreme valuation (+687% DCF premium). The narrative gap (71 vs. 34) implies investors are overestimating positive catalysts. Key tension lies between euphoric overvaluation and negative momentum—does the herd sustain momentum or correct? The open question: *Will sentiment-driven alignment persist or fracture under valuation stress?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:03 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Netskope's AI Security Pipeline Points to Stronger H2, RBC Says"
"Morgan Stanley Adjusts Netskope Price Target to $16 From $14, Maintains Overweight Rating"
"Netskope Shares Rise After Q2 Revenue Exceeds Estimates"
"Netskope Inc (NTSK) (Q2 2027) Earnings Call Highlights: AI Security Drives Strong Growth Amid"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 76/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and cautious views, reflecting stark differences in their core principles. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Walter Bagehot’s high scores (79 and 76) suggest this stock aligns with cyclical strength and liquidity resilience—Nelson sees it as oversold, while Bagehot would trust its ability to weather financial stress. Conversely, Benjamin Graham’s defensive framework (score 19) and Howard Marks’ valuation concerns (score 23) dismiss it outright, flagging weak margins of safety. Meanwhile, Fisher (60) and Lynch (55) strike a middle ground, acknowledging potential but questioning whether the price already baked in its upside. The divide underscores whether the stock’s cyclical or liquidity tailwinds justify its valuation—or if its growth is overpriced or structurally risky under Graham’s or Marks’ lenses.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 76
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 73
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 60
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 55
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 20
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 19
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 19
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 5
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 251 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (11 bullish · 1 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
68.1%
Operating Margin
-92.0%
Net Margin
-95.8%
EBITDA Margin
-85.6%
ROE
-349.2%
ROA
-38.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$3.18
Cash
$432.58M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.13
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$17.49
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$1.81
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-89.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $18.94M | $17.38M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $22.61M | $19.03M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $25.72M | $19.86M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $27.81M | $19.70M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $28.51M | $18.53M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$15.15M
Terminal Value
$449.50M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$292.15M
Enterprise Value
$386.64M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$386.64M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.91
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.52
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Motley Fool · 19.9.2026
Trefis · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Netskope, Inc. (NTSK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NTSK currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NTSK's estimated fair value is $1.81, which is 89.7% below the current price of $17.49. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NTSK's technical score is 92/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 31.7%; Free cash flow growth: 110.5%; Current ratio: 2.13.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $1.81 vs. price $17.49 (-89.7%); Operating margin: -92.0% (negative); Net margin: -95.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NTSK.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 10 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Griffith William J.G. | Open Market Purchase | 13.7.2026 | 64,771 | +64,771 | $12.42 |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VIII Holdings, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 13.7.2026 | 64,771 | +64,771 | $12.42 |
| Griffith William J.G. | Open Market Purchase | 13.7.2026 | 916,690 | +64,771 | $12.42 |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VIII Holdings, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 13.7.2026 | 916,690 | +64,771 | $12.42 |
| Griffith William J.G. | Open Market Purchase | 10.7.2026 | 241,628 | +241,628 | $12.26 |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VIII Holdings, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 10.7.2026 | 241,628 | +241,628 | $12.26 |
| Griffith William J.G. | Open Market Purchase | 10.7.2026 | 851,919 | +241,628 | $12.26 |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VIII Holdings, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 10.7.2026 | 851,919 | +241,628 | $12.26 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | -219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners Select, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | +219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | -219,075 | $12.23 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | +219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners Select, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | -219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners Select, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | -219,075 | $12.23 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | +219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 0 | -219,075 | $12.23 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 0 | -219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners Select, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 219,075 | +219,075 | — |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners Select, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 0 | -219,075 | $12.23 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners Select, L.P. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.7.2026 | 0 | -219,075 | — |
| Wolford Eric | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.7.2026 | 16,778 | +16,778 | — |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VIII Holdings, L.P. | Open Market Purchase | 8.7.2026 | 200 | +200 | $11.67 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners IX, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 10,621 | -10,621 | $11.70 |
| Griffith William J.G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.7.2026 | 16,778 | +16,778 | — |
| Griffith William J.G. | Open Market Purchase | 8.7.2026 | 610,291 | +610,291 | $11.82 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,188,444 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,186,287 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology