Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$526.09
▲ $3.26 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:45 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$9.67B
Day Range
$519.51 - $529.70
52-Week Range
$349.83 - $636.05
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$490.29
Resistance
$635.17
MUSA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+37.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 75.5% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
44
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Murphy USA Inc. has primarily centered on its strong second-quarter earnings report, highlighting surging fuel margins and robust financial performance, including a significant increase in net income and adjusted EBITDA. Additionally, the company has been featured in dividend-focused investment analyses, such as high-growth dividend stock lists, while also exploring strategic initiatives like expanding its retail offerings with White Castle vending machines. Analysts have also discussed its stock performance and potential rebound following the earnings announcement.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Murphy USA Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
41
Fundamentals
48
Technical
44
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
MUSA’s dominant **anchoring** (58) reflects traders’ fixation on the 2.1% support level, likely due to recent underperformance. The **narrative gap** (+16) and **confirmation bias** (21) suggest investors selectively embrace optimistic narratives despite stagnant fundamentals. **Loss aversion** (44) hints at hesitation to exit, while muted volume (0.95x avg) and neutral RSI (37) rule out panic or euphoria. The key question: *Will traders break the anchor at support, or will the gap between narrative and reality widen further?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:51 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Net income came in at $209.1 million... up from $145.6 million... Adjusted EBITDA climbed to $377.3 million from $286.0 million"
"Its profit outlook came down and its cash outlook went up, and only one of those funds the shrinking share count"
"The White Castle Crave & Go kiosks... operate like a vending machine, have hot food ready in about two minutes"
"Top 25 High-Growth Dividend Stocks... targets quality companies trading below intrinsic value with strong long-term return potential"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 68/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s model standing out as the lone bullish voice, scoring 93 and flagging a favorable cycle position near oversold territory. Meanwhile, the majority of frameworks—particularly those rooted in defensive valuation (Graham, Fisher, Lynch) or trend-following (Livermore, Housel)—pile up on the bearish side, scoring below 15 and warning of volatility, poor growth signals, or outright trend resistance. The middle ground is occupied by cyclical analysts like Marks (cycle) and Schwager, who see neutral or early-cycle potential, while crowd psychology models (Mackay) and efficiency proponents (Malkiel/Bogle) remain cautiously mixed. The extreme contrast between Nelson’s technical optimism and the liquidity/valuation risks flagged by Bagehot and Graham highlights how this stock’s perceived risk-reward spectrum depends entirely on whether one prioritizes macro cycles, defensive fundamentals, or speculative momentum.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 55
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 42
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 28
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 23
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 10
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 9
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
3.7%
Net Margin
2.4%
EBITDA Margin
5.1%
ROE
75.5%
ROA
10.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$24.38
Cash
$28.90M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.80
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.8.2026 | $0.650 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.640 |
| 17.5.2026 | $0.640 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.630 |
| 22.2.2026 | $0.630 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.630 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.630 |
| 25.8.2025 | $0.530 |
| 24.8.2025 | $0.530 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.500 |
| 11.5.2025 | $0.500 |
| 24.2.2025 | $0.490 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$31.93
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Trefis · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
USA TODAY · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
C-Store Dive · 24.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MUSA currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
MUSA's technical score is 44/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 75.5% — strong; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.80; Calmar: 0.45 (3y annualized return 15.9% / max drawdown 35.8%).
Yes — MUSA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bartko Eric J. | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $523.60 |
| Turner Rosemary | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 966 | -966 | $571.88 |
| Turner Rosemary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 449 | +449 | — |
| Turner Rosemary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 449.368 | -449.368 | — |
| Turner Rosemary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 617.442 | -617.442 | — |
| Turner Rosemary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 617 | +617 | — |
| Keyes James W | Gift | 11.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | — |
| Keyes James W | Gift | 11.8.2026 | 13,366 | -2,000 | — |
| MILLER DAVID B | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 47.742 | +47.742 | — |
| DEMING CLAIBORNE P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 56.835 | +56.835 | — |
| Phillips Jeanne Linder | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 47.742 | +47.742 | — |
| Taylor Jack T | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 59.109 | +59.109 | — |
| DEMING CLAIBORNE P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,072 | +57 | — |
| MILLER DAVID B | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 897 | +48 | — |
| Taylor Jack T | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,116 | +59 | — |
| Phillips Jeanne Linder | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 428 | +48 | — |
| Landen Diane N | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Landen Diane N | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $547.25 |
| Landen Diane N | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 53,841 | -3,000 | $547.25 |
| Landen Diane N | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 50,841 | -3,000 | — |
| Keyes James W | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 2,339 | -2,339 | $511.00 |
| Keyes James W | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 15,366 | -2,339 | $511.00 |
| Bacon Renee M | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 1,050 | -1,050 | $529.44 |
| Bacon Renee M | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 3,083 | -1,050 | $529.44 |
| Bacon Renee M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 26.5.2026 | 1,550 | -1,550 | $542.74 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
791,626 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 875,132 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology