Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$186.41
▲ $3.35 (+1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/21 05:01 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$3.35B
Day Range
$180.64 - $187.11
52-Week Range
$172.01 - $258.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$177.76
Resistance
$257.21
ABG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-25.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 16.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
10
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
38
Institutional
83
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Asbury Automotive Group Inc. has centered on analyst upgrades and strategic leadership changes. On September 8, 2026, Seaport Global upgraded the stock to "Buy" with a $300 price target, signaling positive market sentiment. Earlier, on August 31, the company announced Wendy Reynolds-Dobbs as its new Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. Additionally, concerns about potential earnings declines in 2027 for major auto dealers, including Asbury, were highlighted by UBS, with ABG’s stock down 15.5% since its last earnings report.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Asbury Automotive Group Inc. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
38
Technical
10
Valuation
55
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-7%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality disconnect** (gap: 27) where euphoric sentiment (98/100) persists despite weak momentum (-0.2% ROC) and underperformance relative to peers. The absence of panic or herding implies confidence is anchored in fundamentals (EPS growth) rather than price action. The key question: *Is the positive sentiment justified by fundamentals, or is it a speculative bubble?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:02 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Seaport Global upgrades Asbury Automotive to Buy from Neutral, price target is $300"
"Asbury Automotive (ABG) reported earnings 30 days ago... stock is down 15.5%"
"Major US franchise auto dealers could face earnings pressure next year if a downside scenario plays out"
"Abacus Global Management announces $100M stock buyback program"
📈 21D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Graham’s defensive and Veblen’s value-based approaches both scoring near the top (74 and 73), suggesting it meets their core criteria for undervaluation or real economic alignment. Meanwhile, Lynch’s moderate score (63) hints at growth already priced in, while Mackay’s (65) signals early crowd enthusiasm—both cautioning that momentum may be building. At the other end, Fisher (16) and Bagehot (0) dismiss it outright, with Fisher lacking quality/growth and Bagehot flagging liquidity risks, while Marks (37) and Loeb (32) warn of valuation and risk concerns. The contrast between Graham’s cautious optimism and Fisher’s outright rejection highlights how even similar value frameworks can clash over what constitutes a true bargain, while the low scores from cyclical or quality-focused investors underscore deep skepticism about the stock’s fundamentals or market positioning.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 75
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 73
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 63
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 60
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 29
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 25
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 22
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 16
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 3
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
17.1%
Operating Margin
4.8%
Net Margin
2.7%
EBITDA Margin
5.2%
ROE
12.6%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$25.20
Cash
$40.40M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.95
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$198.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$82.17
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Fintel · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
Zacks · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 29.7.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
Asbury Automotive Group Inc (ABG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ABG currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ABG's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 16.9%; Net income growth: 14.3%; P/E: 7.4.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.95; Calmar: -0.16 (3y annualized return -6.6% / max drawdown 42.4%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ABG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 10 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milstein Jed | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 948 | -948 | $250.28 |
| Milstein Jed | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 11,259 | -948 | $250.28 |
| Calloway Dean | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 195 | -195 | $201.08 |
| Calloway Dean | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 8,221 | -195 | $201.08 |
| DiSantis B. Christopher | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 157 | +157 | $182.31 |
| DiSantis B. Christopher | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 6,400 | +157 | $182.31 |
| Clara Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,532 | +4,532 | — |
| Clara Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 15,761 | +4,532 | — |
| Hult David W | Gift | 16.3.2026 | 5,085 | -5,085 | — |
| Hult David W | Gift | 16.3.2026 | 85,598 | -5,085 | — |
| DiSantis B. Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 843 | +843 | — |
| DiSantis B. Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.3.2026 | 6,243 | +843 | — |
| DiSantis B. Christopher | Open Market Purchase | 10.3.2026 | 500 | +500 | $202.30 |
| DiSantis B. Christopher | Open Market Purchase | 10.3.2026 | 5,400 | +500 | $202.30 |
| Hult David W | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2026 | 1,604 | +1,604 | $204.73 |
| Hult David W | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2026 | 3,396 | +3,396 | $205.63 |
| Hult David W | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2026 | 87,287 | +1,604 | $204.73 |
| Hult David W | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2026 | 90,683 | +3,396 | $205.63 |
| Hult David W | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2026 | 87,287 | +1,604 | $204.73 |
| Hult David W | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2026 | 90,683 | +3,396 | $205.63 |
| Clara Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 3,056 | +3,056 | — |
| Calloway Dean | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 2,038 | +2,038 | — |
| Briesemeister Nathan Edward | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 254 | +254 | — |
| Hult David W | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.3.2026 | 14,261 | +14,261 | — |
| Welch Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.3.2026 | 423 | -423 | $212.48 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,213,809 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,046,623 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 83.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology