Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.31
▼ $0.03 (-2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:02 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.28 - $1.34
52-Week Range
$0.57 - $3.05
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$0.57
Resistance
$2.05
GPRO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-42.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 79.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$2.09 vs. price $1.31 (-259.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
17d ago · $1.22
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 77)
What happened after
17d ago · $1.22
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 9 to 35 day-over-day
What happened after
17d ago · $1.22
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 7 to 91 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
71
Risk
26
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
23
Institutional
33
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of GoPro, Inc. has centered on its dramatic shift from its traditional action-camera business to AI and data-center technology. The company announced a merger with Starman Optical, a photonics firm specializing in AI networking hardware, sparking a 40% stock surge on September 7. Investors celebrated the pivot, with shares jumping 183% amid speculation about AI growth, though concerns about weak fundamentals and warrant overhangs persisted. The move signals GoPro’s strategic rebranding beyond consumer electronics.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about GoPro, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
66
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Investors appear highly excited (66), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (36).
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
23
Technical
71
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+70%
Market Narrative
87
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+51
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme overconfidence (100) in GPRO is anchored in a disconnect between explosive price momentum (+136.6% ROC) and meager fundamentals (+0.8% EPS growth). Euphoria (86) and FOMO (87) amplify this bias, as extreme sentiment (100/100) and elevated volume (3.21x) suggest herd-like enthusiasm. Confirmation bias (68) is reinforced by a massive narrative-reality gap (+52), where investors prioritize hype over stagnant revenue. The key question: will this momentum sustain, or will the gap between price and fundamentals widen further? Panic selling (35) remains a latent risk due to volatility spikes (3.31x ATR), though it’s overshadowed by euphoric behavior.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:05 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"GoPro announced a definitive merger with Starman Optical, a privately held photonics company that makes optical transceivers for AI data-center networking"
"meme frenzy fueled gains"
"GPRO [...] making outsized moves in options volume"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Jesse Livermore's documented principles, the model estimates a strong positive trend for GPRO, reflected in his high score of 83, whereas most other methodologies assign lower scores, indicating less confidence. The efficient‑market view of Burton Malkiel & John Bogle yields a mixed verdict with a moderate score of 56, suggesting the stock does not clearly outperform a broad index. Value‑focused investors such as Benjamin Graham (scores 18) and Graham’s enterprising side (score 5) find the company fails defensive and valuation criteria, while Howard Marks and Walter Bagehot flag late‑cycle and liquidity risks with scores in the 20‑30 range. These differing outcomes stem from the contrast between momentum‑driven analysis, which sees upside, and fundamentally‑oriented frameworks that highlight risk, overvaluation, and limited growth quality.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 83
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 54
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 43
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 41
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 23
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 19
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 18
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 5
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
33.6%
Operating Margin
-12.8%
Net Margin
-14.3%
EBITDA Margin
-11.7%
ROE
-122.1%
ROA
-21.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$49.67M
Total Debt
$63.92M
Current Ratio
0.91
Debt/Equity
0.84
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.31
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$2.09
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-259.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-22.83M | $-20.94M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-22.12M | $-18.61M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-21.84M | $-16.86M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-21.98M | $-15.57M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-22.53M | $-14.64M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-24.03M
Terminal Value
$-355.21M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-230.86M
Enterprise Value
$-317.49M
Net Debt
$14.25M
Equity Value
$-331.74M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.48
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$0.39
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 12 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Associated Press · 10.9.2026
Associated Press · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
Associated Press · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.9.2026
Benzinga · 6.9.2026
Benzinga · 5.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GPRO currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GPRO's estimated fair value is -$2.09, which is 259.7% below the current price of $1.31. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GPRO's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 79.1%; Free cash flow growth: 81.4%; Net income growth: 78.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$2.09 vs. price $1.31 (-259.7%); Operating margin: -12.8% (negative); Net margin: -14.3% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GPRO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lafrades Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 2,894 | -2,894 | $0.61 |
| Stephen Jason Christopher | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 1,317 | -1,317 | $0.61 |
| Tratt Brian Robert | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 2,871 | -2,871 | $0.61 |
| Woodman Nicholas | Open Market Purchase | 9.7.2026 | 19,280,205 | +19,280,205 | — |
| Woodman Nicholas | Open Market Purchase | 9.7.2026 | 19,280,205 | +19,280,205 | — |
| Lyne Susan M | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 110,181 | +110,181 | — |
| Ahmad-Taylor Tyrone | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 110,181 | +110,181 | — |
| DENNISON MICHAEL C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 110,181 | +110,181 | — |
| Culp Hogue Emily S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 110,181 | +110,181 | — |
| LOPEZ MIGUEL A | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 110,181 | +110,181 | — |
| Kahng Shaz | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 110,181 | +110,181 | — |
| Lyne Susan M | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 449,100 | +110,181 | — |
| Ahmad-Taylor Tyrone | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 363,645 | +110,181 | — |
| Culp Hogue Emily S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 237,539 | +110,181 | — |
| LOPEZ MIGUEL A | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 278,180 | +110,181 | — |
| Kahng Shaz | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 424,455 | +110,181 | — |
| DENNISON MICHAEL C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 237,539 | +110,181 | — |
| MCGEE BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 130,631 | -130,631 | $0.97 |
| MCGEE BRIAN | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 947,123 | -130,631 | $0.97 |
| Stephen Jason Christopher | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 16,894 | -16,894 | $1.11 |
| Stephen Jason Christopher | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 381,324 | -16,894 | $1.11 |
| Jahnke Dean | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 270,270 | +270,270 | — |
| Lafrades Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | — |
| Tratt Brian Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 216,216 | +216,216 | — |
| Stephen Jason Christopher | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 13,999 | -13,999 | $1.11 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
30,578,274 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 23,905,908 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
37.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 37.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology