Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$47.82
▲ $1.98 (+4.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:05 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$26.58B
Day Range
$45.25 - $47.87
52-Week Range
$32.02 - $92.55
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$42.15
Resistance
$69.87
GFS is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+43.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 431.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $25.22 vs. price $47.82 (-47.3%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
51
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of GlobalFoundries Inc. has centered on its strategic advancements in semiconductor manufacturing, particularly the company’s first U.S. shipments of advanced GaN (gallium nitride) power chips through a partnership with Navitas Semiconductor. These GaNFast devices, produced at its Vermont facility, target AI data centers, industrial power systems, and defense applications, marking a significant domestic supply milestone. Analysts have also debated the company’s stock valuation, with mixed views on whether its recent gains reflect fair pricing, alongside broader market trends and geopolitical influences. A separate note highlights ASM’s nomination of Rutger Wijburg to its supervisory board, though unrelated to GlobalFoundries’ core operations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about GlobalFoundries Inc. - Ordinary Share. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
65
Fundamentals
64
Technical
51
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-44%
Market Narrative
87
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+45
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant *Loss Aversion* (80) reflects a defensive posture after a steep 3-month drop (-40.1%), where investors cling to positions despite muted volume activity. The narrative-reality gap (21) suggests sentiment (63) outpaces objective conditions (42), possibly fueling overconfidence (45) in a stock trading 79% above DCF. Key uncertainty remains: whether the 5.6% distance from support will trigger liquidation or if volume spikes could signal capitulation. The absence of panic (18) or herding (0) implies cautious, individual-driven behavior rather than collective panic or herd dynamics.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"first shipments of its 5th Generation GaNFast products from the Burlington facility on GLOBALFOUNDRIES 200 mm GaN-on-silicon platform"
"production now based at U.S. fabs... adds a new domestic source of next-gen power semiconductors"
"GaNFast devices aimed at AI data centers, industrial power systems, and national security uses"
"GLOBALFOUNDRIES’ share price has been under pressure... with a 30-day return of down 12.08%"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-bullish 92 (Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus) to a flat-out bearish 23 (Jesse Livermore’s trend-following rule). The most optimistic models—like Bagehot’s liquidity assessment and Nelson’s cycle positioning—highlight resilience and undervaluation relative to market conditions, suggesting the stock could weather downturns or benefit from a rebound. Meanwhile, growth-oriented investors like Peter Lynch and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) see potential in overlooked upside, while Jack Schwager’s disciplined setup adds a technical edge. Conversely, the more cautious frameworks—from Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria to Morgan Housel’s volatility concerns—flag risks like overvaluation, weak fundamentals, or emotional pitfalls, particularly for patient long-term holders. Even Fisher’s quality-focused approach dismisses it outright, while Livermore’s outright rejection underscores a clear trend-based misalignment.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 82
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 56
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 17
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
24.4%
Operating Margin
11.7%
Net Margin
13.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.4%
ROA
5.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.59
Cash
$1.81B
Total Debt
$1.06B
Current Ratio
2.62
Debt/Equity
0.14
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.6.2026 | $0.120 |
| 23.6.2026 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$47.82
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$25.22
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-47.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $958.55M | $879.40M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $928.60M | $781.58M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $916.99M | $708.08M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $922.72M | $653.68M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $945.79M | $614.70M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.01B
Terminal Value
$14.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$9.69B
Enterprise Value
$13.33B
Net Debt
$-744.00M
Equity Value
$14.07B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$21.46
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$19.73
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
GlobalFoundries Inc. - Ordinary Share (GFS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GFS currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GFS's estimated fair value is $25.22, which is 47.3% below the current price of $47.82. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GFS's technical score is 51/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 431.3%; Net income growth: 438.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $25.22 vs. price $47.82 (-47.3%); ATR: 4.8% of price; Calmar: -0.12 (3y annualized return -6.2% / max drawdown 52.5%).
Yes — GFS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 335 | -335 | $43.24 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 10,469 | -335 | $46.75 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 335 | -335 | $46.75 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 10,804 | -335 | $48.38 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 335 | -335 | $48.38 |
| Raman Pradheepa | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 6,760 | -6,760 | $51.12 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 335 | -335 | $52.62 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 11,474 | -335 | $48.29 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 335 | -335 | $48.29 |
| Pedersen Gregory Johnson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 1,268 | -1,268 | $49.89 |
| Pedersen Gregory Johnson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 761 | -761 | $49.89 |
| Pedersen Gregory Johnson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 12,850 | -1,268 | $49.89 |
| Pedersen Gregory Johnson | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 15,212 | -761 | $49.89 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 30.7.2026 | 335 | -335 | $48.93 |
| Azar Samak L | Open Market Sale | 30.7.2026 | 11,809 | -335 | $48.93 |
| OBEID CARLOS ANTOINE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 1,671 | -1,671 | $49.02 |
| Antaki Marc | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 1,671 | -1,671 | $49.02 |
| Languille Camilla | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 1,671 | -1,671 | $49.02 |
| Languille Camilla | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 7,559 | -1,671 | $49.02 |
| OBEID CARLOS ANTOINE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 19,455 | -1,671 | $49.02 |
| Antaki Marc | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 9,202 | -1,671 | $49.02 |
| OBEID CARLOS ANTOINE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.7.2026 | 430 | -430 | $53.18 |
| LAZAR JACK R | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 3,291 | +3,291 | — |
| KERKO DAVID M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 3,291 | +3,291 | — |
| OBEID CARLOS ANTOINE | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 1,431 | +1,431 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,411,399 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,421,135 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
34.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 20.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology