Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$45.26
▼ $0.47 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:59 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$26.18B
Day Range
$45.14 - $45.57
52-Week Range
$43.00 - $52.34
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
Support
$45.11
Resistance
$50.45
FE is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+4.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.6% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
+5.2%
Median 40D Outcome
78/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+2.2% … +5.2%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.3% … +0.5%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-6.9% … -2.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.8%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.1% | -0.5% … +1.8% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +2.6% | +0.5% … +4.4% | +0.6% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.8% | -1.0% … +3.6% | +1.2% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +5.2% | +1.4% … +6.0% | +1.8% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.1% | -2.0% … +4.7% | +2.6% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-31 | 86/100 | Downtrend | +3.3% | -3.0% |
| 2021-10-12 | 85/100 | Consolidation | +7.3% | +14.6% |
| 2023-09-01 | 83/100 | Downtrend | -8.7% | +4.5% |
| 2024-01-26 | 83/100 | Downtrend | +0.3% | +4.8% |
| 2025-01-06 | 82/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +2.4% | +4.5% |
| 2026-06-02 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +3.9% | +2.1% |
| 2025-12-10 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +0.6% | +14.1% |
| 2021-07-13 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +2.2% | -0.9% |
| 2023-05-16 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +1.8% | -3.3% |
| 2023-07-10 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -6.4% | -12.9% |
| 2023-02-28 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -2.3% | -4.6% |
| 2023-09-27 | 80/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +1.5% | +3.1% |
| 2025-07-02 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +7.4% | +14.3% |
| 2024-12-13 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -2.6% | -1.1% |
| 2026-06-17 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +5.2% | -0.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLU (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
13
Risk
48
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
49
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING FE...
Recent coverage of FirstEnergy has focused on its Potomac Edison subsidiary’s request for a $52.8 million Maryland distribution‑rate adjustment, aimed at funding aging‑infrastructure upgrades, grid modernization and improved electric‑system reliability, with analysts weighing the affordability impact on residential customers. No other notable events involving the company were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about FirstEnergy. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
93
Fundamentals
49
Technical
13
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for FE suggests a dominant psychological state of **anchoring**, where traders may be fixating on the 3.1% distance from support as a reference point for decision-making. The low psychology score (38) and neutral RSI (47) indicate a lack of extreme sentiment, while the narrative-reality gap (8) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and fundamentals. The absence of strong FOMO or panic signals suggests a cautious, non-emotional stance. The key open question is whether traders will act on the support level or remain indifferent, given the muted volatility and neutral momentum.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:00 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The FirstEnergy Foundation is making its largest investment in hunger relief to date, awarding $1.2 million to 37 Pennsylvania food banks and pantries."
"Potomac Edison, a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp., is proposing a Maryland rate adjustment to support continued investment in the electric system, including upgrades to aging infrastructure, grid modernization."
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for this stock reflects deep philosophical and methodological splits among the historical investors. At the top, Mackay and Housel see it as a low-risk, patient-friendly opportunity—Mackay’s high score suggests no crowd-driven frenzy, while Housel’s quiet compounder label implies steady, long-term potential. Meanwhile, Marks and Smith, both valuing cyclical resilience and time horizons, also lean bullish, though with slightly more caution. However, the middle tier—including Loeb, Marks (cycle-focused), and Nelson—cautions that the stock sits in a neutral or mid-cycle phase, where risks aren’t obviously overpriced but aren’t compelling enough for aggressive bets. The bottom half, from Livermore to Graham’s Enterprising Investor, dismisses it outright: Livermore sees no clear trend, while Fisher, Lynch, and Graham’s strict criteria flag it as lacking growth, quality, or value. Even the efficient-market camp and Veblen’s consumption-driven critique undermine its active-picking merits, framing it as either unexplainable or a speculative growth trap.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 89
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 37
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 19
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
14.6%
Net Margin
6.8%
EBITDA Margin
14.6%
ROE
8.2%
ROA
1.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.77
Cash
$57.00M
Total Debt
$723.00M
Current Ratio
0.57
Debt/Equity
0.06
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.8.2026 | $0.465 |
| 7.5.2026 | $0.465 |
| 6.5.2026 | $0.465 |
| 6.2.2026 | $0.445 |
| 5.2.2026 | $0.445 |
| 7.11.2025 | $0.445 |
| 6.11.2025 | $0.445 |
| 7.8.2025 | $0.445 |
| 6.8.2025 | $0.445 |
| 7.5.2025 | $0.445 |
| 6.5.2025 | $0.445 |
| 7.2.2025 | $0.425 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$21.64
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
PR Newswire · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
PR Newswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
PR Newswire · 3.9.2026
FirstEnergy (FE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FE currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FE's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.6% of price; Debt/equity: 0.06; Revenue growth (last year): 12.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.57; Calmar: 0.46 (3y annualized return 7.1% / max drawdown 15.6%).
Yes — FE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicks Lisa Winston | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | — |
| KALETA PAUL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | — |
| Turner Leslie M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | — |
| DEMETRIOU STEVEN J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | — |
| Croom Jana T | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | — |
| ONEIL JAMES F | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | — |
| SOMERHALDER JOHN W II | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 898 | +898 | $47.30 |
| Croom Jana T | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 15,008 | +898 | — |
| DEMETRIOU STEVEN J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 30,358 | +898 | — |
| Hicks Lisa Winston | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 19,372 | +898 | — |
| KALETA PAUL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 19,372 | +898 | — |
| ONEIL JAMES F | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 47,161 | +898 | — |
| SOMERHALDER JOHN W II | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 161,022 | +898 | $47.30 |
| Turner Leslie M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 25,850 | +898 | — |
| TIERNEY BRIAN X | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 16,991 | -16,991 | $45.90 |
| TIERNEY BRIAN X | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 523,810 | -16,991 | $45.90 |
| ONEIL JAMES F | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | — |
| DEMETRIOU STEVEN J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | — |
| Hicks Lisa Winston | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | — |
| SOMERHALDER JOHN W II | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | $50.73 |
| Turner Leslie M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | — |
| Williams Melvin D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | — |
| KALETA PAUL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 837 | +837 | — |
| Croom Jana T | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 13,970 | +837 | — |
| DEMETRIOU STEVEN J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 29,555 | +837 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
29,123,883 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 24,939,277 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology