Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$65.35
▲ $0.39 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 10:10 AM
Fundamentals updated: 08/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$64.69 - $65.90
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$63.26
Resistance
$71.50
EQR is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-0.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.06
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING EQR...
Recent media coverage of Equity Residential has primarily centered on its merger with AvalonBay Communities to form Vivmark Residential, creating the largest U.S. apartment REIT by unit count (184,000) and enterprise value ($70 billion). Post-merger, Vivmark has faced index exclusions (e.g., FTSE, Russell benchmarks) and stock market adjustments, while also receiving credit upgrades (S&P’s ‘A’ rating). Additionally, Equity Residential’s former executive, Robert Garechana, joined Sun Communities as CFO, highlighting industry leadership transitions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Equity Residential. News trend score: 44. Reason: 4 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
87
Fundamentals
65
Technical
23
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
35
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 0.6% proximity to support, likely treating it as a critical threshold. The low FOMO and absence of euphoria indicate no speculative frenzy, while the modest panic selling score (24) hints at cautious liquidation rather than distress. The narrative gap (-16) implies a disconnect between market sentiment (36) and objective conditions (52), reinforcing reliance on past price levels. The key question: will traders break the anchor at support, or will the stock stabilize near this level?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:57 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Vivmark Residential becomes the largest US apartment REIT after merging AvalonBay and Equity Residential, with 184K units and $70B EV."
"Vivmark Residential’s Credit Rating Upgraded to ‘A’ by S&P Global Ratings"
"Mr. Garechana brings over two decades of REIT finance experience to Sun, joining from multifamily REIT Equity Residential (NYSE:EQR), where he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer since 2025."
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for EQR reflects deep methodological differences between value, growth, and cycle-based investors. Mackay and Nelson’s near-perfect scores highlight their focus on avoiding speculative bubbles and identifying oversold conditions, both seeing it as a low-risk opportunity. Meanwhile, Fisher’s high score underscores his emphasis on exceptional company fundamentals, while Marks (cycle) and Smith’s mid-range scores suggest it aligns with structural growth phases but isn’t yet in a late-cycle bubble. Conversely, Graham, Lynch, and Livermore’s low scores stem from strict valuation thresholds, defensive criteria, and trend-following rules—all of which flag EQR as either overpriced or misaligned with their core strategies. The contrast between Bagehot’s liquidity concerns and Malkiel/Bogle’s efficient-market skepticism further illustrates how structural risks and passive investing principles clash with more active, fundamental approaches.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 96
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 89
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 75
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 18
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 261 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
62.9%
Operating Margin
48.4%
Net Margin
36.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.1%
ROA
5.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.95
Cash
$55.90M
Total Debt
$8.24B
Current Ratio
0.06
Debt/Equity
0.75
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.6.2026 | $0.703 |
| 28.6.2026 | $0.703 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.703 |
| 29.3.2026 | $0.703 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.693 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.693 |
| 25.9.2025 | $0.693 |
| 24.9.2025 | $0.693 |
| 24.6.2025 | $0.693 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.693 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.693 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.693 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$29.23
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$29.53
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 13 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
PR Newswire · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
CRE Daily · 19.8.2026
The Daily Upside · 19.8.2026
Business Wire · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Barchart · 17.8.2026
ChartMill · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
Yahoo · 16.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.8.2026
Equity Residential (EQR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EQR currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EQR's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.7% of price; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.06; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — EQR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carr Chris | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | $0.50 |
| Aman Angela M | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | — |
| HABEN MARY KAY | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,276 | +3,276 | — |
| Hoff Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,276 | +3,276 | — |
| Huque Tahsinul Zia | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | — |
| Jones Nina P | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,276 | +3,276 | — |
| NEITHERCUT DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 23,281 | +23,281 | — |
| NEITHERCUT DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 27,716 | +27,716 | — |
| SHAPIRO MARK S | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | — |
| STERRETT STEPHEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,276 | +3,276 | — |
| HABEN MARY KAY | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 13,255 | +3,276 | — |
| NEITHERCUT DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 27,716 | +27,716 | — |
| NEITHERCUT DAVID J | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 23,281 | +23,281 | — |
| STERRETT STEPHEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 24,551 | +3,276 | — |
| SHAPIRO MARK S | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | — |
| Aman Angela M | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | — |
| Huque Tahsinul Zia | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | — |
| Carr Chris | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 3,561 | +3,561 | $0.50 |
| Jones Nina P | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 7,182 | +3,276 | — |
| Hoff Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 6,986 | +3,276 | — |
| Kaufman Ian | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 32 | +32 | $53.31 |
| Kaufman Ian | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 29,626 | +32 | $53.31 |
| Kaufman Ian | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.3.2026 | 150 | +150 | $52.65 |
| Kaufman Ian | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.3.2026 | 29,594 | +150 | $52.65 |
| Carraway Catherine | Open Market Sale | 18.2.2026 | 749 | -749 | $63.56 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,421,902 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 10,284,676 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology