Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$34.64
▼ $1.38 (-3.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:50 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$4.57B
Day Range
$34.19 - $36.14
52-Week Range
$25.78 - $73.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$34.19
Resistance
$46.59
ENPH is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-9.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 72.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $3.98 vs. price $34.64 (-88.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
16
Risk
40
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
64
Institutional
43
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Enphase Energy highlights its growth in smart energy solutions, particularly its **IQ solid-state transformer technology** for AI data centers, now being manufactured in Texas. The company has also expanded **EV charger compatibility across Europe**, enhancing smart charging integration for homes. Additionally, Enphase surpassed **7,500 Enphase Care enrollments** in the U.S., signaling strong customer adoption of its long-term support programs. Analysts frequently mention its stock performance and leadership in the solar and energy tech sectors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Enphase Energy, Inc.. News trend score: 38. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
74
Fundamentals
64
Technical
16
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-34%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+13
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (52) reflects lingering reluctance to exit after a steep 3-month drop, despite modest volume. **Herding** (46) and **Overconfidence** (45) coexist, as the stock’s recent surge (+6.8%) and extreme valuation (+875% above DCF) may lure buyers chasing momentum. **Euphoria** (35) is muted by weak distance above the 200-day average, suggesting caution rather than blind optimism. The key question: Will the **narrative gap** (78 vs. 36) widen as fundamentals fail to justify the rally, or will loss aversion keep buyers anchored in the face of reality?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:56 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"a credible claim on the AI data-center power market"
"power modules for its IQ® Solid-State Transformer (IQ SST) are now being built in the United States"
"the one posting the worst losses also happens to be the most profitable of the group"
"Enphase Energy (ENPH) reached $36.15... reflecting a +1.77% change compared to its last close"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the high scores from Nelson (75), Lynch (74) and Marks‑cycle (74), the model estimates the stock looks attractive because it is near an oversold position, its growth has not yet been fully priced in, and it sits early in the market cycle. The mid‑range scores from Mackay (65), Veblen (58) and Bagehot (57) inject caution, noting crowd excitement, uncertain profit translation and only adequate liquidity. The lower scores—from Schwager (52) down to Housel (3)—signal growing concerns, ranging from a lack of clear edge and weak evidence versus an index to serious risk, valuation and volatility warnings that would deter more conservative or value‑oriented investors. Thus, the divergence across methodologies reflects each investor’s core focus—growth and cycle timing versus safety margins, trend adherence and market‑efficiency considerations—producing optimism in growth‑oriented frameworks and caution in value‑oriented or risk‑averse ones.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 85
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 74
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 57
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 28
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 25
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 12
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 3
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.6%
Operating Margin
10.7%
Net Margin
11.7%
EBITDA Margin
16.2%
ROE
15.8%
ROA
4.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.31
Cash
$474.32M
Total Debt
$1.20B
Current Ratio
2.07
Debt/Equity
1.11
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$34.64
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$3.98
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-88.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $91.11M | $83.58M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $88.26M | $74.29M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $87.16M | $67.30M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $87.70M | $62.13M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $89.89M | $58.42M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$95.90M
Terminal Value
$1.42B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$921.30M
Enterprise Value
$1.27B
Net Debt
$730.06M
Equity Value
$536.97M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8.06
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ENPH currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ENPH's estimated fair value is $3.98, which is 88.5% below the current price of $34.64. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ENPH's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 72.0%; Net income growth: 67.7%; Current ratio: 2.07.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $3.98 vs. price $34.64 (-88.5%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.8% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ENPH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $40.36 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 10,422 | -1,500 | $40.36 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 30.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $36.76 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 30.7.2026 | 11,922 | -2,000 | $36.76 |
| Trivedi Shanker | Open Market Purchase | 12.6.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $53.91 |
| Trivedi Shanker | Open Market Purchase | 12.6.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $53.91 |
| Trivedi Shanker | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 4,551 | +4,551 | $54.93 |
| Trivedi Shanker | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 4,551 | +4,551 | $54.93 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 700 | -700 | $64.20 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 13,922 | -700 | $64.20 |
| Kothandaraman Badrinarayanan | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 4,400 | +4,400 | $67.37 |
| Kothandaraman Badrinarayanan | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 600 | +600 | $68.39 |
| Kothandaraman Badrinarayanan | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 1,645,032 | +4,400 | $67.37 |
| Kothandaraman Badrinarayanan | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 1,645,632 | +600 | $68.39 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 700 | -700 | $46.39 |
| MORA RICHARD | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 14,622 | -700 | $46.39 |
| Malchow Joseph Ian | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,952 | +5,952 | — |
| MORA RICHARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,952 | +5,952 | — |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,952 | +5,952 | — |
| GOMO STEVEN J | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 6,428 | +6,428 | — |
| Haenggi Jamie Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,952 | +5,952 | — |
| Kortlang Benjamin John | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 5,952 | +5,952 | — |
| Rodgers Thurman J | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 8,542 | +5,952 | — |
| GOMO STEVEN J | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 14,359 | +6,428 | — |
| Haenggi Jamie Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 20,898 | +5,952 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
23,375,084 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 23,034,764 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology