Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$81.36
▲ $1.48 (+1.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:37 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$79.16 - $81.74
52-Week Range
$60.55 - $153.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$60.55
Resistance
$117.49
CRWV is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-33.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 167.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$466.20 vs. price $81.36 (-673.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
36
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $81.36
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -19 to 13 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $82.98
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 19 to -17 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $82.98
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 29 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $94.84
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 12 to 43 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
28
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
17
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CoreWeave, Inc. highlights its rapid expansion in AI infrastructure, driven by a substantial backlog of contracts and strong demand for GPU-based cloud computing. Investors are closely examining the company’s aggressive capital spending, mounting debt, and persistent losses, raising questions about its long-term sustainability. Notably, CoreWeave’s stock has declined 13% over three months amid broader scrutiny of its growth strategy, while its association with Nvidia’s $99 billion investment portfolio—including a significant stake—has drawn attention to its role in the AI ecosystem.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CoreWeave, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
17
Technical
13
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-31%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CRWV strongly suggests **FOMO-driven buying**, as momentum, volume, and extreme positive sentiment converge. Herding is also active, given the stock’s outperformance relative to peers, while euphoria and overconfidence are secondary but notable—particularly given the disconnect between price gains and EPS growth. The large narrative-reality gap (35) further implies traders may be prioritizing short-term trends over fundamentals. The key open question is whether this momentum can sustain itself or if it will correct as traders reassess valuation.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"NBIS surges 253.5% in a year on AI infrastructure demand"
"soaring capital spending, debt and losses raise questions about its next move"
"NVIDIA’s $99 billion portfolio included several billion dollars of CoreWeave equity"
"CoreWeave operates as an emerging contracted AI utility with developing software capabilities"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Peter Lynch and Charles Mackay standing out as the only two models that see potential, while the rest overwhelmingly flag it as risky or unattractive. Lynch’s high score suggests he’d view it as an underappreciated growth candidate, where the price hasn’t yet reflected its true potential—a classic Lynch playbook. Mackay’s moderate approval implies no obvious speculative bubble, but his caution contrasts sharply with the near-unanimous red flags from the rest, particularly Graham, Loeb, and Bagehot, who dismiss it outright for lacking defensive qualities, excessive risk, or poor liquidity. Meanwhile, Fisher and Nelson’s lukewarm takes highlight a lack of clear quality or cyclical clarity, while the ultra-conservative models like Livermore and Schwager’s wizards would outright reject it for violating core trend-following or setup discipline. The divergence underscores a fundamental tension: Lynch’s growth optimism clashes with the risk-averse consensus, which sees this stock as either overvalued, volatile, or fundamentally flawed.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 20
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 11
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
71.7%
Operating Margin
-0.9%
Net Margin
-22.7%
EBITDA Margin
46.9%
ROE
-35.0%
ROA
-2.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.75
Cash
$3.13B
Total Debt
$21.37B
Current Ratio
0.46
Debt/Equity
6.41
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$81.36
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$466.20
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-673.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-9.06B | $-8.32B |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-10.82B | $-9.11B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-12.31B | $-9.50B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-13.31B | $-9.43B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-13.64B | $-8.87B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-7.25B
Terminal Value
$-215.10B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-139.80B
Enterprise Value
$-185.02B
Net Debt
$18.25B
Equity Value
$-203.26B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.65
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 5 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 36/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CRWV currently scores 36/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CRWV's estimated fair value is -$466.20, which is 673.0% below the current price of $81.36. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CRWV's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 167.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 34.7%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$466.20 vs. price $81.36 (-673.0%); Operating margin: -0.9% (negative); Net margin: -22.7% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CRWV.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 24 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goldberg Chen | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 13,042 | -13,042 | $92.97 |
| Goldberg Chen | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 9,382 | -9,382 | $100.00 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 21,139 | -21,139 | $99.85 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 4,305 | -4,305 | $98.75 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 70 | -70 | $104.44 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 29,945 | -29,945 | $102.96 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 11,274 | -11,274 | $100.85 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 8,539 | -8,539 | $101.97 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 4,742 | -4,742 | $94.60 |
| Intrator Michael N | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.9.2026 | 107,692 | -107,692 | — |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 55,614 | -55,614 | $102.96 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 14,154 | -14,154 | $95.79 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 130 | -130 | $104.44 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 5,468 | -5,468 | $103.72 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,260 | -1,260 | $98.02 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,340 | -2,340 | $98.02 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,240 | -2,240 | $93.35 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 20,926 | -20,926 | $100.85 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 4,160 | -4,160 | $93.35 |
| McVeety Kristen J | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 55,945 | -55,945 | $93.54 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 7,995 | -7,995 | $98.75 |
| McVeety Kristen J | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 41,555 | -41,555 | $94.47 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 15,861 | -15,861 | $101.97 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 10,155 | -10,155 | $103.72 |
| Intrator Michael N | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 4,556 | -4,556 | $96.57 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
55,568,683 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 61,265,138 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology