Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$332.63
▲ $2.69 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$38.25B
Day Range
$328.92 - $339.90
52-Week Range
$227.00 - $474.03
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$273.80
Resistance
$378.99
CLS is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+31.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 28.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.0% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
69
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Celestica, Inc.** has centered on its improving earnings outlook and growth tied to **AI infrastructure demand**, particularly in hyperscaler programs and data center connectivity. Analysts highlight strong cash flow and upward revisions to estimates, positioning the company favorably amid rising AI hardware investments. However, broader industry themes—such as supply chain risks and competitive pressures—remain under discussion. The focus remains on Celestica’s role in AI’s expanding physical infrastructure.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Celestica, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 18 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
60
Technical
69
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
79
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+37
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant psychological state is **Loss Aversion**, as the 16% three-month decline and elevated volume imply investors are hesitant to cut losses. While FOMO and Euphoria scores are elevated, they lack extreme technical confirmation (RSI at 50, neutral Bollinger %B). The narrative gap (26 points) suggests investors may be overestimating recovery potential. The key question: *Will volume sustain or fade as profit-taking pressure grows?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Celestica's growth outlook boosted by AI infrastructure demand"
"Celestica's growth linked to new hyperscaler programs"
"Celestica's strong cash flow boosts earnings estimates"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented methodologies and more conservative or cyclical frameworks. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score and the unanimous endorsement from Veblen, Smith, and Mackay suggest a consensus that CLS is a high-potential, long-term growth play—where fundamentals and future potential outweigh current valuation. Meanwhile, Fisher and Marks temper this enthusiasm, noting that while the business is solid, market expectations may already be pricing in much of its upside. On the other end of the spectrum, Graham’s low scores and Livermore’s outright negative verdict reflect deep skepticism: Graham sees it as fundamentally risky, while Livermore’s trend-following discipline would reject it outright. The middle ground—from Bagehot’s liquidity concerns to Housel’s volatility warnings—highlights a stock that could appeal to patient, high-conviction investors but would be a red flag for those prioritizing stability or short-term momentum.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 68
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 44
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 39
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 28
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 20
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 9
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
12.1%
Operating Margin
8.4%
Net Margin
6.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
37.6%
ROA
11.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.22
Cash
$595.60M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.44
Debt/Equity
0.35
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$19.29
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 18 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Celestica, Inc. (CLS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CLS currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CLS's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 28.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 98.3%; Net income growth: 94.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.0% of price; -13.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index; P/E: 46.8.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CLS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 16 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 261 | -261 | $365.34 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 4,030 | -4,030 | $364.49 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 5,270 | -5,270 | $363.52 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 5,554 | -5,554 | $360.37 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,440 | -3,440 | $362.58 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 4,941 | -4,941 | $361.44 |
| Kale Jill | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 190 | +190 | — |
| Maletira Amar | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 142 | +142 | — |
| KOELLNER LAURETTE T | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 317 | +317 | — |
| Ahuja Kulvinder | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 133 | +133 | — |
| Colpron Francoise | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 203 | +203 | — |
| CASCELLA ROBERT | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 142 | +142 | — |
| Colpitts Christopher W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 190 | +190 | — |
| Reeder David | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 133 | +133 | — |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,271 | +1,271 | — |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 40 | -40 | $378.50 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 502 | -502 | $376.50 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,247 | -1,247 | $375.41 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 256 | -256 | $377.38 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 4,876 | -4,876 | $371.45 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,536 | -1,536 | $374.55 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,073 | -1,073 | $372.42 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 983 | -983 | $373.43 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 6,674 | -6,674 | $370.45 |
| MIONIS ROBERT | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 13,414 | -13,414 | $369.47 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,990,612 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,262,099 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology