Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$53.88
▼ $0.51 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:12 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$44.75B
Day Range
$52.96 - $54.85
52-Week Range
$50.24 - $76.76
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$52.96
Resistance
$70.90
CARR is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-11.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 0/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
78/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
-3.4%
Median 40D Outcome
62/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+3.6% … +13.1%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.5% … +0.7%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-6.2% … -2.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.8%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 75% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.2% | -1.3% … +3.2% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.4% | -2.6% … +3.8% | +0.3% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -2.3% … +6.4% | +0.2% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -3.4% | -6.7% … +9.3% | +1.3% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -3.4% | -9.3% … +15.2% | +3.6% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-15 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -7.1% | -13.7% |
| 2025-10-13 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +0.8% | -5.3% |
| 2026-03-27 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +14.1% | +36.5% |
| 2022-04-29 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +5.1% | +3.3% |
| 2022-04-12 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -10.0% | -12.6% |
| 2025-09-29 | 74/100 | Downtrend | -1.4% | -9.8% |
| 2025-11-14 | 73/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -2.8% | +19.9% |
| 2026-03-12 | 73/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +12.1% | +19.2% |
| 2022-02-18 | 72/100 | Downtrend | +7.7% | -8.8% |
| 2022-01-28 | 70/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -3.4% | -13.8% |
| 2025-02-03 | 70/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -1.7% | -1.0% |
| 2022-03-11 | 68/100 | Downtrend | +0.4% | -7.5% |
| 2024-12-20 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +2.0% | -3.4% |
| 2025-12-09 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +1.9% | +11.1% |
| 2025-04-03 | 65/100 | Downtrend | +17.8% | +22.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
| Symbol | Matched date | Similarity | 20D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSPN | 2026-06-24 | 50/100 | +9.1% |
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 22, 2026
Then
37
$60.37
Now
38
$53.88
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
6
Risk
42
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING CARR...
Recent media coverage of Carrier Global has primarily centered on two key developments: the company’s acquisition of **75F**, a cloud-based building automation firm, aimed at enhancing its intelligent building solutions through AI-driven, wireless, and connected technologies. Additionally, Carrier Global was highlighted as a participant in California’s **SHARE virtual power plant (VPP) initiative**, alongside PG&E, Google, Tesla, and others, which seeks to integrate home energy devices—like smart appliances and batteries—to improve grid reliability and affordability. Analysts also noted the company’s underperformance in the industrial sector.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Carrier Global. News trend score: 74. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
66
Fundamentals
50
Technical
6
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-25%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CARR suggests a dominant **loss aversion** bias, likely stemming from a prolonged 3-month decline (-12.1%) and subdued trading activity. Investors may be hesitant to realize losses, avoiding aggressive selling despite neutral volume and sentiment. The narrative gap (-4) hints at a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but the key question remains whether this reluctance will persist or shift as price approaches key support levels. The absence of FOMO or euphoria reinforces caution, while herding is minimal given CARR’s slight outperformance today.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:51 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Carrier Global Corp. plans to accelerate its intelligent building capabilities through its recent acquisition of 75F, a cloud-native, wireless, AI-enabled building automation solutions provider."
"PG&E, together with Rewiring America, Google, Carrier Global Corporation, Tesla, Sunrun, Renew Home, Demand Response and Others, launched SHARE (Smart Home Assets for Reliability and Efficiency), a first-of-its-kind virtual power plant."
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing it as a cautious opportunity and others dismissing it outright. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology analysis and Howard Marks’ market cycle assessment—suggest it lacks the frenzied speculative traits or extreme valuation that would trigger a red flag, positioning it as a mid-cycle or disciplined trade. Meanwhile, disciplined traders like Jack Schwager and Gerald Loeb also lean positive, emphasizing its risk-reward balance or moderate risk profile. However, value-focused investors like Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher reject it entirely, citing a lack of statistical cheapness or quality/growth traits, while efficient-market proponents question whether active selection adds meaningful value. The contrast highlights a tension between cyclical/relative-value strategies (which see potential) and strict value or growth criteria (which see none).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 89
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 86
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 32
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 29
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 26
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 18
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 16
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 12
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 12
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 11
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
10.0%
Net Margin
6.8%
EBITDA Margin
15.8%
ROE
10.5%
ROA
4.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.74
Cash
$1.55B
Total Debt
$11.47B
Current Ratio
1.20
Debt/Equity
0.81
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.7.2026 | $0.240 |
| 20.7.2026 | $0.240 |
| 4.5.2026 | $0.240 |
| 3.5.2026 | $0.240 |
| 20.1.2026 | $0.240 |
| 19.1.2026 | $0.240 |
| 29.10.2025 | $0.225 |
| 28.10.2025 | $0.225 |
| 21.7.2025 | $0.225 |
| 20.7.2025 | $0.225 |
| 2.5.2025 | $0.225 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.225 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$16.38
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$8.93
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 10 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Barrons.com · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Barchart · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
POWER Magazine · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Stocktwits · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Carrier Global (CARR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 38/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CARR currently scores 38/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CARR's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.00 (3y annualized return 0.0% / max drawdown 39.1%); Revenue growth (last year): -3.3%.
Yes — CARR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barua Neil | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 2,831.011 | +2,831.011 | $68.88 |
| Barua Neil | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 2,831 | +2,831 | $68.88 |
| Dryden Edward C. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 6,894 | +6,894 | — |
| Dryden Edward C. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 6,894 | -6,894 | — |
| Dryden Edward C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 2,147 | -2,147 | $72.07 |
| Dryden Edward C. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 11,505 | +6,894 | — |
| Dryden Edward C. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 9,358 | -2,147 | $72.07 |
| Dryden Edward C. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 0 | -6,894 | — |
| Viessmann Maximilian | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 12,094,823 | -12,094,823 | $62.01 |
| Viessmann Maximilian | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 37,979,286 | -12,094,823 | $62.01 |
| Pandya Gaurang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 50,616 | +50,616 | — |
| Pandya Gaurang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 50,616 | -50,616 | — |
| Pandya Gaurang | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 21,546 | -21,546 | $67.62 |
| Pandya Gaurang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 71,436 | +50,616 | — |
| Pandya Gaurang | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 49,890 | -21,546 | $67.62 |
| Pandya Gaurang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 0 | -50,616 | — |
| GARNIER JEAN PIERRE | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,330.487 | +3,330.487 | $58.55 |
| GREISCH JOHN J | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,945.346 | +3,945.346 | $58.55 |
| TODMAN MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,637.916 | +3,637.916 | $58.55 |
| MILES AMY E | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,484.202 | +3,484.202 | $58.55 |
| MCNAMARA MICHAEL M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,637.916 | +3,637.916 | $58.55 |
| STORY SUSAN N | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,807.003 | +5,807.003 | $58.55 |
| HOLLEY CHARLES M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 6,148.591 | +6,148.591 | $58.55 |
| WILSON VIRGINIA M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,791.631 | +3,791.631 | $58.55 |
| Viessmann Maximilian | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 3,330.487 | +3,330.487 | $58.55 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,294,532 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 18,047,437 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology