Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$24.43
▼ $0.50 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:23 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.77B
Day Range
$24.25 - $24.95
52-Week Range
$15.26 - $37.33
Beta
—
Next Earnings
07.12.2026
Support
$20.93
Resistance
$35.02
BRZE is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-24.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 24.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $14.63 vs. price $24.43 (-40.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
8d ago · $24.27
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 52 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
19
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
31
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Braze, Inc. has centered on its financial outlook and investor sentiment, with analysts maintaining a positive stance. DA Davidson and Barclays both upgraded their price targets for Braze, signaling confidence in its growth potential. Additionally, the company’s stock was impacted by broader market trends, including geopolitical tensions and executive share sales, though it also saw gains alongside other enterprise software stocks linked to AI-driven growth. No company-specific operational or strategic developments were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Braze, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
31
Technical
19
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+22%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+21
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
BRZE’s psychology is dominated by **euphoria**, where extreme valuation (+107% above DCF) and positive momentum align with overconfidence in price appreciation. The narrative-reality gap (35) suggests traders may be ignoring fundamental growth stagnation (-0.2% EPS) while chasing gains. FOMO is present but muted, as volume remains modest (0.79x average) and RSI (59) lacks extreme overbought signals. The key question: *Is this euphoria rooted in genuine conviction or speculative overreach?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:21 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Braze (BRZE) Surpasses Q2 Earnings and Revenue Estimates"
"Lifts Fiscal 2027 Outlook"
"Braze stock tumbles 10% on weak third quarter EPS guidance"
"DA Davidson raises price target from $33 to $40"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, reflecting stark differences in their core principles. Philip Fisher’s high score suggests it meets his criteria for solid industry leadership and growth potential, though he wouldn’t call it exceptional. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s near-zero score aligns with his strict defensive investing rules, where the stock fails basic valuation and margin-of-safety thresholds. The middle ground—where investors like Peter Lynch and Morgan Housel see *some* merit but not enough to justify a strong bet—highlights a consensus that the stock’s price already embeds much of its upside, leaving little room for further appreciation. At the other extreme, late-cycle thinkers like Howard Marks and Gerald Loeb warn of overvaluation or hidden risks, while crowd psychology critics like Charles Mackay and Thorstein Veblen see speculative excess. The contrast underscores whether this is a disciplined growth play (Fisher) or a speculative bubble (Graham/Mackay), with most methodologies landing somewhere in between.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 74
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 47
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 35
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 24
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 22
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 6
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
67.1%
Operating Margin
-19.6%
Net Margin
-17.8%
EBITDA Margin
-17.0%
ROE
-21.0%
ROA
-11.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.22
Cash
$124.34M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.35
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$24.43
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$14.63
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-40.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $77.31M | $70.93M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $92.29M | $77.68M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $104.98M | $81.07M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $113.51M | $80.41M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $116.35M | $75.62M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$61.85M
Terminal Value
$1.83B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.19B
Enterprise Value
$1.58B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.58B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.78
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.78
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Stocktwits · 9.9.2026
Braze, Inc. (BRZE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BRZE currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BRZE's estimated fair value is $14.63, which is 40.1% below the current price of $24.43. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BRZE's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 24.4%; Free cash flow growth: 163.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $14.63 vs. price $24.43 (-40.1%); Operating margin: -19.6% (negative); Net margin: -17.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BRZE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 20 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,143,219 | -9,320 | $33.12 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,152,539 | -32,680 | $32.28 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 9,320 | -9,320 | $33.12 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 32,680 | -32,680 | $32.28 |
| McDonnell Edward M. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 409,630 | -5,805 | $31.74 |
| McDonnell Edward M. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 415,435 | -23,927 | $31.29 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 1,185,219 | -10,000 | $31.04 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $31.04 |
| McDonnell Edward M. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 23,927 | -23,927 | $31.29 |
| McDonnell Edward M. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 5,805 | -5,805 | $31.74 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $30.75 |
| Malik Astha | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $30.75 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 2,288 | -2,288 | $28.77 |
| Malik Astha | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 7,530 | -7,530 | $30.36 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 6,925 | -6,925 | $30.37 |
| Malik Astha | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 7,794 | -7,794 | $28.74 |
| Malik Pankaj | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 2,121 | -2,121 | $28.93 |
| McDonnell Edward M. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 92,970 | -92,970 | $28.93 |
| Malik Astha | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 21,277 | -21,277 | $28.93 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 15,784 | -15,784 | $28.93 |
| Magnuson William | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 46,421 | -46,421 | $28.93 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 35,000 | -35,000 | $30.03 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,220,416 | -35,000 | $30.03 |
| Hyman Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 10,148 | -10,148 | $27.27 |
| Malik Astha | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 33,656 | -33,656 | $27.65 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,806,220 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,843,868 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology