Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$42.85
▼ $0.49 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:06 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$42.57 - $43.44
52-Week Range
$25.58 - $70.71
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$28.80
Resistance
$49.54
BLKB is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-37.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $61.23 vs. price $42.85 (+42.9%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.2% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $42.85
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 29 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
58
Value
62
Momentum
33
Risk
20
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
54
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Blackbaud, Inc. highlights its stock performance, strategic innovations, and recognition in philanthropy. The company saw a **21.2% stock rise** since its last earnings report, driven by **AI integration** in fundraising tools like Raiser’s Edge NXT and its **Microsoft 365 Copilot integration**, aiming to enhance donor intelligence. Blackbaud also announced **Expedited Giving+**, accelerating corporate donations to nonprofits, and hosted the **2026 Blackbaud Impact Awards**, featuring finalists like Jennifer Sniderman and Wesco. An **insider sold shares worth $804,984**, sparking investor attention. Overall, themes include growth, technological advancements, and nonprofit engagement.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Blackbaud, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
54
Technical
33
Valuation
62
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+58%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
BLKB’s dominant **herding** reflects relative underperformance against peers, with traders aligning despite modest gains. The **euphoria** score (40) hints at detached optimism—positive sentiment and momentum overshadowing valuation gaps. **Confirmation bias** (14) suggests selective focus on margins over stagnant revenue. The key question: will traders pivot from herd behavior if peers diverge further, or will euphoria persist despite valuation concerns?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:07 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"How Could Blackbaud (BLKB) Change Fundraising Work With Its New AI Integration?"
"Blackbaud Announces the Winners of the 2026 Blackbaud Impact Awards"
"Blackbaud is Delivering Corporate Donations to Nonprofits Faster than Ever with Expedited Giving+"
"Blackbaud remains under pressure, down ~30% and trading at low valuation multiples after a lackluster Q2 earnings report."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some seeing strong growth potential while others flag severe risks. Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen both score it highly (71), with Lynch calling it a ‘growth candidate’ where the price hasn’t yet reflected its upside, and Veblen noting alignment between growth and real value creation—suggesting they’d both lean bullish based on momentum and fundamentals. In contrast, the majority of methodologies—particularly Graham, Fisher, and Loeb—score it poorly (27 or below), with Graham and Fisher dismissing it for lacking defensive or quality traits, while Loeb and Bagehot warn of unacceptable risk profiles tied to volatility and liquidity. The middle ground, represented by Malkiel/Bogle (59) and Livermore (53), acknowledges uncertainty, with the former questioning whether active selection beats passive indexing and the latter avoiding it due to unclear trends. The extreme caution from Marks (33) and Housel (0) underscores a late-cycle or volatile warning, while Mackay (45) hints at speculative crowd behavior. The divergence stems from whether the stock’s momentum or valuation justifies the risk—growth-focused investors see opportunity, while risk-averse or defensive strategists see red flags.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 78
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 71
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 33
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 27
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 10
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 7
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 5
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
58.8%
Operating Margin
16.9%
Net Margin
10.2%
EBITDA Margin
24.5%
ROE
135.2%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.41
Cash
$38.91M
Total Debt
$1.11B
Current Ratio
0.79
Debt/Equity
13.05
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$42.85
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$61.23
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+42.9%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2% | $263.50M | $241.74M |
| 2 | 2.3% | $269.52M | $226.85M |
| 3 | 2.4% | $275.88M | $213.03M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $282.58M | $200.19M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $289.64M | $188.25M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$257.78M
Terminal Value
$4.57B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.97B
Enterprise Value
$4.04B
Net Debt
$1.07B
Equity Value
$2.97B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.75
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$22.25
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
PR Newswire · 18.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 14.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 13.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 13.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 12.8.2026
PR Newswire · 11.8.2026
PR Newswire · 10.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
ChartMill · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BLKB currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BLKB's estimated fair value is $61.23, which is 42.9% above the current price of $42.85. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BLKB's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $61.23 vs. price $42.85 (+42.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 140.0%; Net income growth: 138.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.2% of price; Current ratio: 0.79; Calmar: -0.23 (3y annualized return -16.3% / max drawdown 69.8%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BLKB.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Chad | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $47.56 |
| Benjamin David J | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,086 | -2,086 | $48.27 |
| Gianoni Michael P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 423,264 | -17,000 | $47.35 |
| Gianoni Michael P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 17,000 | -17,000 | $47.35 |
| Anderson Chad | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 589 | -589 | $46.21 |
| Gregoire Kevin P. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 16,184 | -16,184 | $45.43 |
| Gregoire Kevin P. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 5,816 | -5,816 | $45.72 |
| Gregoire Kevin P. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 119,010 | -16,184 | $45.43 |
| Gregoire Kevin P. | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 113,194 | -5,816 | $45.72 |
| Nanney Don Roger | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 7,834 | +7,834 | — |
| Leitch Andrew M | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 7,834 | +7,834 | — |
| DeFiore Deneen | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 7,834 | +7,834 | — |
| Pyburn Bradley L | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 7,834 | +7,834 | — |
| Talvitie Kristian | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 7,834 | +7,834 | — |
| Leitch Andrew M | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 48,035 | +7,834 | — |
| Talvitie Kristian | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 15,887 | +7,834 | — |
| Nanney Don Roger | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 24,453 | +7,834 | — |
| DeFiore Deneen | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 17,903 | +7,834 | — |
| Pyburn Bradley L | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 13,103 | +7,834 | — |
| Anderson Chad | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,205 | -6,205 | $31.31 |
| Anderson Chad | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 62,869 | -6,205 | $31.31 |
| Anderson Chad | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 1,137 | -1,137 | $37.54 |
| Anderson Chad | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 616 | +616 | — |
| Anderson Chad | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 187 | -187 | $37.54 |
| Anderson Chad | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.5.2026 | 68,645 | -1,137 | $37.54 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,667,406 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,179,024 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology