Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Materials · ·
$60.15
▼ $0.60 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/21 06:16 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$15.92B
Day Range
$60.14 - $61.31
52-Week Range
$44.83 - $68.29
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$59.34
Resistance
$67.55
BALL is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+22.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 313.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $46.73 vs. price $60.15 (-22.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-1.6%
Median 40D Outcome
61/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+2.4% … +5.0%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.6% … -0.6%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-9.7% … -2.2%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.6%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
3 occurrence(s) · 33% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 25% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | +0.2% | -1.9% … +1.2% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.3% | -1.7% … +5.1% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.6% | -3.1% … +2.7% | +0.5% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -1.6% | -5.2% … +2.7% | +1.4% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.4% | -2.0% … +5.4% | +1.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-14 | 86/100 | Downtrend | -1.4% | +8.1% |
| 2022-03-08 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +2.2% | -17.4% |
| 2017-08-18 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.6% | +0.5% |
| 2026-05-04 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -11.8% | +7.2% |
| 2021-01-19 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -0.6% | +0.1% |
| 2017-11-17 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -3.6% | -2.2% |
| 2022-04-14 | 83/100 | Downtrend | -20.0% | -22.4% |
| 2018-02-02 | 83/100 | Downtrend | +6.6% | +4.8% |
| 2021-12-22 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | +3.9% |
| 2026-03-26 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +2.8% | +1.4% |
| 2021-10-04 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.4% | +6.0% |
| 2021-02-05 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -7.6% | +4.8% |
| 2022-01-18 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.6% | -1.8% |
| 2024-01-31 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +15.5% | +25.9% |
| 2024-10-30 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -2.5% | -13.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLB (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
59
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
29d ago · $63.59
Evidence: 7 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $62.62
Evidence: 2 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
33d ago · $61.50
Evidence: 2 bullish / 9 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
48
$61.55
Now
52
$60.15
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
51
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
33
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BALL...
Recent media coverage on Ball Corporation has been limited and indirect, focusing primarily on broader industry comparisons rather than specific company developments. Most headlines instead discuss mid-cap stocks, growth potential, and market challenges—highlighting Ball’s position as a mid-cap player facing competition and valuation scrutiny amid shifting investor expectations. No direct news about Ball’s operations, earnings, or strategic moves appears in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ball Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
73
Fundamentals
57
Technical
33
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixating on the 1.0% support level, likely due to its proximity. Overconfidence (28) hints at investors overestimating fundamentals despite divergent momentum, while the 21-point narrative gap implies a disconnect between perceived and actual value. The key question is whether the 1.0% support holds or if traders will reassess their DCF premium (+31%) under pressure. Low FOMO (8) and herding (19) indicate limited contagion risk, but overconfidence may persist until evidence shifts.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:17 AM
What could change this?
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BALL reflects deep methodological contrasts: value-focused purists like Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant (scores of 27 and 13) dismiss it outright, seeing no margin of safety or statistical undervaluation, while cyclical and patient investors like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (94) and Morgan Housel (88) highlight its oversold technicals or long-term compounding potential. Meanwhile, growth-oriented thinkers like Peter Lynch (43) and Thorstein Veblen (33) reject it for lacking explosive growth or signaling speculative excess, while market-cycle analysts like Howard Marks (54) and Jack Schwager (44) remain cautiously neutral, torn between solid fundamentals and elevated expectations. The split underscores whether BALL’s appeal lies in defensive stability (which Graham rejects) or speculative momentum (which Veblen and Livermore dismiss).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 88
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 83
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 62
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 62
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 43
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 39
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 33
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$59.34
Range Bottom
$67.55
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
7.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
16.9%
ROA
4.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.33
Cash
$1.21B
Total Debt
$2.00M
Current Ratio
1.11
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.200 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.5.2026 | $0.200 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.11.2025 | $0.200 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 1.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 1.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.200 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$60.15
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$46.73
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-22.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.1% | $786.87M | $721.90M |
| 2 | 0.5% | $790.95M | $665.72M |
| 3 | 1.2% | $800.27M | $617.95M |
| 4 | 1.8% | $814.99M | $577.36M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $835.36M | $542.93M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$788.00M
Terminal Value
$13.17B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$8.56B
Enterprise Value
$11.69B
Net Debt
$-1.21B
Equity Value
$12.90B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$19.64
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.22
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Fintel · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
PR Newswire · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Packaging Gateway · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Motley Fool · 25.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 25.8.2026
Ball Corporation (BALL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BALL currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BALL's estimated fair value is $46.73, which is 22.3% below the current price of $60.15. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BALL's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 313.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 2.0% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $46.73 vs. price $60.15 (-22.3%); Calmar: 0.16 (3y annualized return 6.0% / max drawdown 36.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -74.6%.
Yes — BALL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 2,278 | +2,278 | $56.64 |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 1,788 | +1,788 | $55.87 |
| Glew Mandy | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 5,626 | -5,626 | $63.80 |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 2,015 | +2,015 | $51.35 |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 2,015 | -2,015 | — |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 2,278 | -2,278 | — |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 1,788 | -1,788 | — |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 1,788 | -1,788 | — |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 10,820 | +1,788 | $55.87 |
| Glew Mandy | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 7,209 | -5,626 | $63.80 |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 759 | -2,278 | — |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 12,835 | +2,015 | $51.35 |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 9,032 | +2,278 | $56.64 |
| Glew Mandy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 25.8.2026 | 6,046 | -2,015 | — |
| Goodwin Deron | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 6,940 | -6,940 | $63.04 |
| Goodwin Deron | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 1,869 | -1,869 | $63.00 |
| Goodwin Deron | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 6,940 | -6,940 | — |
| Goodwin Deron | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 6,940 | +6,940 | $37.59 |
| Goodwin Deron | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 12,007 | -1,869 | $63.00 |
| Goodwin Deron | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 5,067 | -6,940 | $63.04 |
| Goodwin Deron | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 12,007 | +6,940 | $37.59 |
| Goodwin Deron | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 0 | -6,940 | — |
| Sapp Betty J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 1,145 | -1,145 | — |
| Ross Cathy D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 102 | -102 | — |
| Ross Cathy D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 102 | +102 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,802,511 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,633,843 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
75.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 74.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology