Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$24.86
▲ $0.07 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/21 12:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$5.07M
Day Range
$24.82 - $24.98
52-Week Range
$23.60 - $26.04
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$24.33
Resistance
$25.14
-3.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/21 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 24.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -0.8% / max drawdown 9.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
52
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
39
Risk
56
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
57
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
7
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
77
Fundamentals
57
Technical
39
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+5
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 20/100
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 97
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 95
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 92
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 91
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 86
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 75
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 67
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 34
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 29
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$24.33
Range Bottom
$25.14
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
10.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
13.2%
ROA
0.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$16.89B
Total Debt
$7.85B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.38
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.9.2026 | $0.453 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.453 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.453 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.453 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.453 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.453 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.453 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.453 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.453 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.453 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.453 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.453 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixed-Rate Reset Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2064 (ATHS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ATHS currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ATHS's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 24.1%; ATR: 0.9% of price; Debt/equity: 0.38.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -0.8% / max drawdown 9.0%); Net income growth: -21.7%; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — ATHS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kvalheim Grant | Other Transaction | 30.6.2025 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $25.00 |
| Downing Michael Stephen | Other Transaction | 30.6.2025 | 8,000 | -8,000 | $25.00 |
| Belardi James Richard | Other Transaction | 30.6.2025 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $25.00 |
| Kvalheim Grant | Open Market Sale | 29.2.2024 | 22,500 | -22,500 | $24.84 |
| Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2023 | 560,000 | +560,000 | $25.00 |
| Klein Martin P | Open Market Purchase | 12.12.2022 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $25.00 |
| Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.1.2022 | 800,000 | +800,000 | $25.00 |
| Michelini Matthew | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 63,267 | -63,267 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.1.2022 | 6,969 | +6,969 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 13,797 | -13,797 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 6,969 | -6,969 | — |
| VanBeck Sarah Jean | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 4,184 | -4,184 | — |
| WRUBEL ARTHUR | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 5,151 | -5,151 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 8,265 | -8,265 | — |
| Zeko Fehmi Alexander | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 9,787 | -9,787 | — |
| SWANN LYNN C | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 1,223 | -1,223 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.1.2022 | 8,265 | +8,265 | — |
| Zeko Fehmi Alexander | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 5,151 | -5,151 | — |
| Ruisi Lawrence | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 5,151 | -5,151 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 2,324 | -2,324 | — |
| VanBeck Sarah Jean | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 5,361 | -5,361 | — |
| WRUBEL ARTHUR | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 28,390 | -28,390 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 3,950 | -3,950 | — |
| VanBeck Sarah Jean | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 2,461 | -2,461 | — |
| Niemann Douglas Bartlett | Disposition to the Company | 1.1.2022 | 1,378 | -1,378 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,650 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 14,121 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology