Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$308.06
▼ $13.54 (-4.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:27 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$307.76 - $328.15
52-Week Range
$297.50 - $745.61
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$297.50
Resistance
$534.03
APP is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-50.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 70.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.3% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
78/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
-7.2%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+5.1% … +39.8%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-25.2% … -17.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.2%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
5 occurrence(s) · 40% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 67% (42%–85%) | +6.3% | -7.5% … +12.2% | +0.9% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | -1.8% | -14.1% … +13.2% | +2.2% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.2% | -23.4% … +18.8% | +3.3% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -7.2% | -30.0% … +22.0% | +8.7% |
| 60D | 33% (15%–58%) | -29.0% | -37.6% … +20.5% | +14.9% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | 78/100 | High Volatility | -23.2% | -34.2% |
| 2023-05-02 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +53.8% | +92.3% |
| 2022-09-15 | 74/100 | High Volatility | -24.8% | -57.5% |
| 2022-06-30 | 74/100 | High Volatility | +3.2% | -41.0% |
| 2022-05-31 | 73/100 | High Volatility | -6.7% | -29.0% |
| 2022-08-01 | 73/100 | High Volatility | -27.0% | -45.0% |
| 2022-02-16 | 73/100 | High Volatility | -23.6% | -42.6% |
| 2022-04-01 | 72/100 | High Volatility | -25.7% | -33.3% |
| 2026-04-10 | 72/100 | High Volatility | +19.7% | +33.4% |
| 2026-05-13 | 72/100 | High Volatility | +5.5% | -25.3% |
| 2026-03-25 | 71/100 | High Volatility | +4.0% | +7.5% |
| 2023-01-19 | 71/100 | High Volatility | +53.2% | +60.5% |
| 2026-06-23 | 70/100 | High Volatility | -11.7% | -31.1% |
| 2026-04-29 | 69/100 | High Volatility | +35.3% | -6.9% |
| 2025-07-22 | 69/100 | Consolidation | +17.9% | +72.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
7d ago · $323.96
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 3 to 31 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
29d ago · $305.77
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
29d ago · $305.77
Evidence: 0 bullish / 11 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $313.50
Evidence: +3.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
32d ago · $313.50
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $313.50
Evidence: 0 bullish / 11 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $309.73
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $309.73
Evidence: 0 bullish / 11 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
53
$312.02
Now
60
$308.06
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
34
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
78
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING APP...
Recent media coverage of **AppLovin** has centered on investor concerns and analyst adjustments amid broader market uncertainty. Analysts like HSBC and BTIG have lowered their price targets (to $450 and $396, respectively) while maintaining "Buy" ratings, reflecting cautious optimism. The company was also flagged by Evercore ISI as potentially vulnerable to sell-offs if AI-focused IPOs like OpenAI’s divert capital from struggling tech stocks. No substantive operational updates were provided.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AppLovin. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
78
Technical
34
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-34%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (92) reflects deep psychological resistance to further losses after a steep 3-month drop, despite muted trading activity. Herding (25) hints at cautious underperformance relative to peers, while FOMO (12) remains dormant due to weak momentum and volume. The key question is whether traders will hold or exit, given the gap between narrative optimism (48) and harsh reality (42). Overconfidence (5) suggests some traders may still bet on short-term rebounds, but the data does not support broader euphoria or panic. The open question: Will the 7.2% support hold, or will loss aversion trigger further defensive positioning?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:54 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Evercore warns AI IPOs could pressure struggling stocks like AppLovin"
"BTIG lowers AppLovin price target to $396 from $408"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Philip Fisher rates APP as an exceptional quality company (score 93) whereas Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria find it fails most safeguards (score 20). Peter Lynch’s growth lens still sees upside, assigning a strong growth‑candidate score of 86, while Jesse Livermore’s trend‑following rule turns negative, giving a low 39 due to an adverse price trend. Howard Marks (both cycle and general) place the stock in an early‑to‑mid‑cycle window with moderate scores of 72 and 43, reflecting a mixed view of valuation and expectations. In contrast, the efficient‑market perspective of Malkiel & Bogle and the volatility warning from Morgan Housel yield the lowest scores (36 and 0), indicating skepticism about any durable advantage over a broad index.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 75
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 62
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 20
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
87.9%
Operating Margin
75.8%
Net Margin
60.8%
EBITDA Margin
79.3%
ROE
156.2%
ROA
45.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.84
Cash
$2.49B
Total Debt
$3.51B
Current Ratio
3.32
Debt/Equity
1.65
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$6.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
AppLovin (APP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
APP currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
APP's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 70.0%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 115.2%; Net income growth: 111.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.3% of price; Debt/equity: 1.65; Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for APP.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cacovean Corina I | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 1,540 | -1,540 | $308.77 |
| Foroughi Arash Adam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 2,730 | -2,730 | $308.77 |
| Ge Xiaochuan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 5,459 | -5,459 | $308.77 |
| Valenzuela Victoria | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 2,730 | -2,730 | $308.77 |
| Stumpf Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 2,021 | -2,021 | $308.77 |
| Chen Herald Y | Conversion of Derivative Security | 13.8.2026 | 251,245 | +143,791 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 151,245 | -100,000 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Conversion of Derivative Security | 13.8.2026 | 223,676 | -143,791 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Conversion of Derivative Security | 13.8.2026 | 143,791 | -143,791 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Chen Herald Y | Conversion of Derivative Security | 13.8.2026 | 143,791 | +143,791 | — |
| Vivas Eduardo | Gift | 7.8.2026 | 6,571,412 | -213,675 | — |
| Vivas Eduardo | Gift | 7.8.2026 | 213,675 | +213,675 | — |
| Vivas Eduardo | Gift | 7.8.2026 | 213,675 | +213,675 | — |
| Vivas Eduardo | Gift | 7.8.2026 | 213,675 | -213,675 | — |
| Messing Barbara | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 40 | +40 | — |
| WEBB MAYNARD G JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 41 | +41 | — |
| WEBB MAYNARD G JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 3,198 | +41 | — |
| Messing Barbara | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 10,190 | +40 | — |
| WEBB MAYNARD G JR | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 262 | -262 | $524.12 |
| WEBB MAYNARD G JR | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 1,140 | -1,140 | $523.49 |
| WEBB MAYNARD G JR | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 412 | -412 | $522.42 |
| WEBB MAYNARD G JR | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 120 | -120 | $521.49 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,555,736 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,911,631 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology