Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$60.70
▲ $0.38 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:36 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.40B
Day Range
$59.58 - $60.77
52-Week Range
$44.93 - $63.61
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.10.2026
Support
$55.22
Resistance
$63.61
+21.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $81.59 vs. price $60.70 (+34.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -13.1%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
88
Risk
64
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
55
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Westamerica Bancorporation has primarily centered on its **dividend performance**, including quarterly payouts and analyst recognition as a dividend-paying stock. Analysts have adjusted price targets, while reports highlight its consistent dividend payments and inclusion in dividend-focused lists. Financial results for Q2 2026 were also briefly summarized, though no major operational or strategic shifts were detailed. The focus remains on stability and investor returns.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Westamerica Bancorporation. News trend score: 32. Reason: 5 of the last 9 articles are negative, versus 2 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
41
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
55
Technical
88
Valuation
67
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
30
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-22
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers rather than acting on independent signals. The stock’s slight underperformance relative to its sector peers (-1.4% vs. -1.5%) may reflect passive replication of broader market or peer-group moves. Low volatility and neutral RSI rule out panic or euphoria, while the narrative gap (-27) hints at a disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals. The key question is whether this synchronized trading persists or if dispersion emerges as traders reassess individual catalysts.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:56 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend" (GlobeNewswire, #5)"
""Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights" (SeekingAlpha, #1 & #4)"
""Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results" (GlobeNewswire, #7)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between long-term value and growth-oriented methodologies. The most bullish signals come from **Edgar Lawrence Smith** (100) and **Walter Bagehot** (100), though the latter’s verdict is limited by data constraints, while Smith’s ‘buy-and-hold for a decade’ endorsement suggests a conviction in sustained, unanalyzable potential. Meanwhile, **Benjamin Graham** (81) and **Howard Marks** (82) lean toward defensive or risk-priced opportunities, favoring stability and valuation discipline. In contrast, **Peter Lynch** (29) and **Philip Fisher** (0) dismiss it outright—Lynch for lacking growth justification and Fisher for insufficient fundamentals—while **Jesse Livermore** (61) and **Jack Schwager** (43) see no clear trend or edge, preferring to avoid ambiguity. The divide highlights whether the stock’s appeal lies in **patient, long-term conviction** (Smith, Bagehot) or **fundamental rigor** (Graham, Lynch), versus skepticism about **momentum, valuation, or data gaps** (Fisher, Livermore).
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 78
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 75
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 64
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 57
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 40
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 33
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 6
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$55.22
Range Bottom
$63.61
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.4%
ROA
1.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.52
Cash
—
Total Debt
$137.30M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.15
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.8.2026 | $0.480 |
| 2.8.2026 | $0.480 |
| 4.5.2026 | $0.480 |
| 3.5.2026 | $0.480 |
| 2.2.2026 | $0.460 |
| 1.2.2026 | $0.460 |
| 3.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 2.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 4.8.2025 | $0.460 |
| 3.8.2025 | $0.460 |
| 5.5.2025 | $0.460 |
| 4.5.2025 | $0.460 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$60.70
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$81.59
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+34.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $131.62M | $120.75M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $142.31M | $119.78M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $151.20M | $116.76M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $157.82M | $111.80M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $161.76M | $105.14M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$119.65M
Terminal Value
$2.55B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.66B
Enterprise Value
$2.23B
Net Debt
$137.30M
Equity Value
$2.09B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$36.36
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$31.62
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 2 positive, 2 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 9 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 3.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 23.7.2026
Associated Press · 16.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 16.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.5.2026
StockStory · 25.5.2026
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WABC currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WABC's estimated fair value is $81.59, which is 34.4% above the current price of $60.70. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WABC's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $81.59 vs. price $60.70 (+34.4%); ATR: 2.0% of price; Debt/equity: 0.15.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -13.1%; Free cash flow growth: -14.4%; Net income growth: -16.2%.
Yes — WABC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belton Curtis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 9,200 | -9,200 | — |
| Belton Curtis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 0 | -9,200 | — |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | — |
| DONOHOE BRIAN J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 5,900 | -5,900 | — |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 14,400 | -14,400 | — |
| DONOHOE BRIAN J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 15,100 | -15,100 | — |
| DONOHOE BRIAN J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 0 | -15,100 | — |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.7.2026 | 0 | -15,000 | — |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 10,200 | -10,200 | — |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 5,100 | -10,200 | — |
| Belton Curtis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.4.2026 | 10,600 | -10,600 | — |
| Belton Curtis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.4.2026 | 5,300 | -10,600 | — |
| Wondeh Inez | Open Market Purchase | 22.4.2026 | 61 | +61 | $53.79 |
| Wondeh Inez | Open Market Purchase | 22.4.2026 | 1,007 | +61 | $53.79 |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Open Market Sale | 20.4.2026 | 759 | -759 | $53.83 |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Open Market Sale | 20.4.2026 | 0 | -759 | $53.83 |
| DONOHOE BRIAN J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.3.2026 | 1,010 | -1,010 | $50.90 |
| Ensinger George S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.3.2026 | 1,156 | -1,156 | $50.90 |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.3.2026 | 601 | -601 | $50.90 |
| Ensinger George S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.3.2026 | 6,565 | -1,156 | $50.90 |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.3.2026 | 759 | -601 | $50.90 |
| DONOHOE BRIAN J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.3.2026 | 3,814 | -1,010 | $50.90 |
| Jonas Anela Marya | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 15 | +15 | — |
| Jonas Anela Marya | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 236 | +15 | — |
| Baker Robert James Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 1,360 | +1,360 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
900,411 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 864,818 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology