Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$86.69
▼ $1.02 (-1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:05 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$44.47B
Day Range
$86.55 - $87.66
52-Week Range
$66.63 - $101.60
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$86.55
Resistance
$101.60
VTR is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+27.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 184.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.22
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (71/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
50
Value
45
Momentum
33
Risk
42
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
46
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING VTR...
Recent media coverage of **Ventas (VTR)** has centered on its status as a top dividend stock, with analysts highlighting its strong yield as an attractive option for income-focused investors. Scotiabank raised its price target to $95 while maintaining a "Sector Perform" rating, while JPMorgan increased its target to $104, keeping an "Overweight" recommendation. The broader context includes discussions of senior housing REITs benefiting from aging demographics, though Ventas itself was not the sole focus in those pieces. Overall, the focus remains on its dividend reliability and investor appeal amid market shifts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ventas. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
97
Fundamentals
46
Technical
33
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are passively mirroring peers’ moves, with VTR’s slight underperformance relative to its sector (-0.4% vs. -0.5%) reinforcing conformity. Anchoring at 4.5% above support hints at potential reluctance to sell, while low FOMO/Euphoria scores reflect muted enthusiasm. The key question is whether this alignment persists or if a divergence—like a break below support—could trigger a shift. Narrative-reality gaps (14-point gap) may also fuel cautious positioning, but no clear catalyst emerges from the data.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:35 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ventas (VTR) is a Top Dividend Stock Right Now: Should You Buy?"
"Scotiabank analyst raises Ventas price target to $95 from $93"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: the bullish growth-focused investors and the deeply cautious, value-driven skeptics. Mackay, Nelson, Lynch, and Smith—all scoring in the high 70s—see it as a promising opportunity, whether through avoiding crowd mania, favorable cycle positioning, or undervalued growth potential, framing it as a long-term hold or a cyclical rebound. In contrast, Fisher, Housel, Livermore, and especially Graham (who scores near zero) dismiss it outright, with Fisher calling it lacking in quality/growth traits and Graham labeling it a complete failure of defensive metrics. The middle ground—Marks, Schwager, and Bagehot—sits uneasily between optimism and caution, flagging mixed signals, risk profiles, or liquidity concerns, while the efficient-market theorists see no clear edge over passive investing. The divide hinges on whether the stock’s perceived growth justifies speculative bets or if its risks outweigh any potential rewards.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 63
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 43
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 28
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 12
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 4
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
41.4%
Operating Margin
14.4%
Net Margin
4.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
1.9%
ROA
0.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.55
Cash
$741.07M
Total Debt
$13.01B
Current Ratio
0.22
Debt/Equity
1.01
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.520 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.520 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.520 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.520 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.480 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.480 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.480 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.480 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.480 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.480 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.480 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.480 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$27.17
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$27.14
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Business Wire · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Ventas (VTR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VTR currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
VTR's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 184.2%; Net income growth: 196.0%; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.22; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — VTR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wattula Andy | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 4,314 | +4,314 | $93.51 |
| Wattula Andy | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 10,694 | +10,694 | $93.51 |
| Wattula Andy | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 10,694 | +10,694 | $93.51 |
| Wattula Andy | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 15,008 | +4,314 | $93.51 |
| Smith Maurice S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 71.615 | +71.615 | $95.04 |
| Roy Sumit | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 47.088 | +47.088 | $95.04 |
| LUSTIG MATTHEW J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 209.667 | +209.667 | $95.04 |
| NADER MARGUERITE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 71.615 | +71.615 | $95.04 |
| LUSTIG MATTHEW J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 71.615 | +71.615 | $95.04 |
| Rodriguez Joe Vasquez Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 48.513 | +48.513 | $95.04 |
| Martino Roxanne M | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 173.886 | +173.886 | $95.04 |
| Roy Sumit | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 71.615 | +71.615 | $95.04 |
| Barnes Melody C | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 71.615 | +71.615 | $95.04 |
| Smith Maurice S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 56.195 | +56.195 | $95.04 |
| EMBLER MICHAEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 71.615 | +71.615 | $95.04 |
| LUSTIG MATTHEW J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 95,663 | +210 | $95.04 |
| LUSTIG MATTHEW J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 95,735 | +72 | $95.04 |
| EMBLER MICHAEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 19,274 | +72 | $95.04 |
| NADER MARGUERITE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 23,544 | +72 | $95.04 |
| Roy Sumit | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 24,800 | +47 | $95.04 |
| Roy Sumit | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 24,872 | +72 | $95.04 |
| Barnes Melody C | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 35,379 | +72 | $95.04 |
| Martino Roxanne M | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 66,846 | +174 | $95.04 |
| Smith Maurice S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 31,240 | +56 | $95.04 |
| Smith Maurice S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 31,311 | +72 | $95.04 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,372,121 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 23,665,480 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology