Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.29
▲ $0.07 (+5.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:19 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.20 - $1.30
52-Week Range
$0.66 - $3.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$0.66
Resistance
$1.88
VIOT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-61.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 13.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
VIOT demonstrates a robust overall score of 87, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and a favorable news sentiment environment. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 92, reflecting a clear bullish momentum: the stock price sits comfortably above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, while the MACD histogram and RSI (57.8) confirm a healthy upward trend. News sentiment is equally positive, with multiple intraday and session-based articles highlighting movement in consumer discretionary stocks—VIOT’s sector—as well as unusual volume activity, reinforcing its relevance in current market dynamics. However, the risk category drags the score down to 34, exposing significant volatility concerns. The ATR (15.6% of price) and a high maximum drawdown potential (81.8% over three years) underscore elevated volatility risks, particularly given the stock’s recent 41.8% gain relative to its benchmark. While the positive momentum and sector activity are compelling, the volatility metrics serve as a critical cautionary note for investors weighing exposure.
The stock price is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, and the RSI (57.8) indicates healthy upward momentum. The %K (39.3) remains neutral, suggesting no overbought conditions.
Strong technicals like these typically signal sustained bullish momentum, making it easier for investors to justify holding or accumulating shares.
Recent news coverage is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple references to VIOT’s sector (consumer discretionary) as a focal point in intraday and unusual volume discussions. No negative news is present in the provided data.
Positive news sentiment can attract more buying interest, potentially reinforcing upward price movement and reducing downside pressure.
The stock exhibits high volatility, with an ATR of 15.6% of its price and a high maximum drawdown potential (81.8% over three years). The Sharpe ratio (0.12) suggests low risk-adjusted returns, indicating significant price swings relative to gains.
Such volatility metrics imply higher potential for sharp price corrections, which could erode gains or trigger stop-losses for investors.
StockIQ conclusion
VIOT presents a compelling case for investors focused on technical strength and sector momentum, with a strong investor score of 87 and near-perfect news sentiment. However, the elevated risk metrics—particularly the high volatility and maximum drawdown potential—serve as a critical counterbalance. The stock’s ability to maintain its current momentum will depend heavily on sustained sector performance and whether volatility remains contained. Investors should carefully weigh the trade-off between potential gains and the inherent risks tied to VIOT’s volatility profile.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $1.22
Evidence: -12.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $1.22
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $1.22
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $1.31
Evidence: +4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $1.33
Evidence: +5.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $1.31
Evidence: +4.2pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $1.26
Evidence: -9.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $1.26
Evidence: -5.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $1.26
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $1.26
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $1.35
Evidence: -3.9pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $1.35
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $1.35
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $1.40
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 62)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
11d ago · $1.10
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
11d ago · $1.10
Evidence: 3.8x recent average volume
What happened after
11d ago · $1.10
Evidence: 11 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
11d ago · $1.10
Evidence: -3.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
12d ago · $1.14
Evidence: -16.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
12d ago · $1.14
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 5, 2026
Then
87
$1.14
Now
77
$1.29
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
77
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
🕵️ What the Detective found on VIOT
Detective Score 80/100 · 3 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
3 signals are currently converging on VIOT at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
What this means now: The stock moved a lot more (or less) today than the average of other stocks in its sector — it stands out relative to its peers.
Why it matters: A move that meaningfully outpaces its sector suggests something company-specific, not just a sector-wide trend.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Based on the provided sources, there is **no recent English-language media coverage** specifically mentioning Viomi Technology Co. Ltd. The headlines and summaries focus solely on other companies (e.g., American Outdoor Brands, Golden Sun Technology, Tilly’s) and general market trends, with no references to Viomi’s activities, stock performance, or news.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Viomi Technology Co. Ltd. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
48
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
—
Technical
77
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+50%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+38
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for VIOT suggests a dominant narrative of FOMO and euphoria, driven by extreme momentum, elevated volume, and perfect sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (38 points) implies traders may be overestimating sustainability, while herding and panic signals hint at potential overreaction. The key open question is whether the momentum-driven rally will persist or if relative underperformance today signals early signs of fatigue. Anchoring near support (41.9% away) could act as a psychological barrier if sentiment shifts.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:24 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"VIOT reported first-half results... as the market struggles to find balance after the national water-purification subsidy program in China was not renewed in 2026."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for VIOT reflects a clash between momentum-driven and fundamental/valuation-based approaches. Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager’s high scores (92 and 80, respectively) suggest the stock exhibits the precise price action and risk-reward dynamics they prioritize—sharp trends and disciplined setups. In contrast, the majority of methodologies—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—score it at 50 or below due to insufficient data to meet their rigorous standards for balance sheets, fundamentals, or growth. Meanwhile, cautionary voices like Loeb (21) and Housel (0) flag volatility and risk profiles that align with their principles, while Mackay’s low score (27) hints at speculative crowd behavior. The contrast underscores how technical traders and fundamentalists often reach opposing conclusions when data gaps or market psychology dominate.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 83
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 49
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 43
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 41
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 6.4.2026 | $0.066 |
| 5.4.2026 | $0.066 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.088 |
| 30.7.2025 | $0.088 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 4 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks Small Cap Research · 28.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Viomi Technology Co. Ltd (VIOT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for VIOT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
VIOT's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 13.6% of price; Calmar: 0.15 (3y annualized return 11.9% / max drawdown 81.8%); Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — VIOT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
238,059 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 451,069 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
27.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology