Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$133.06
▼ $1.26 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:27 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$12.26B
Day Range
$132.11 - $134.50
52-Week Range
$123.15 - $168.36
Beta
—
Next Earnings
07.12.2026
Support
$130.26
Resistance
$157.51
TOL is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-4.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $161.44 vs. price $133.06 (+21.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 19.5% / max drawdown 46.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
13
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
61
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Toll Brothers, Inc. has focused on its expansion into high-end residential projects, particularly luxury townhomes and gated communities. The company announced new releases, including four-story townhomes with premium features in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the final sales opportunity in a Valencia, California, development. Despite a decline in third-quarter profits—driven by lower sales margins—Toll Brothers reported a steady pipeline of buyer contracts, reflecting ongoing demand. The company’s long-term stock performance and market position were also highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Toll Brothers, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
61
Technical
13
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-15%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for TOL is dominated by anchoring, as traders appear fixated on the 0.1% proximity to support. Despite extreme positive sentiment and a 100/100 news score, momentum and valuation metrics (e.g., -16% DCF discount) suggest detached optimism. The narrative gap (7 points) hints at a disconnect between perceived and actual fundamentals. Key open question: Will traders hold near support, or will the lack of momentum break the anchor? The absence of panic or herding implies discipline, but anchoring alone may not sustain if sentiment shifts.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"‘final opportunity to purchase a new home’ in Valencia, California (Article 6)"
"‘new model home now open for tours’ in Cumming, Georgia (Article 10)"
"‘Net income slid to $280.1M... down from $369.6M’ (Article 2)"
"‘luxury townhome community’ in Charlotte (Article 1) and ‘gated luxury community’ in Valencia (Article 6)"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent scores reflect stark contrasts between cyclical, value-driven, and contrarian approaches. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score suggests the stock sits in a favorable cycle phase, closer to oversold than overbought, while Howard Marks and Edgar Lawrence Smith see it as a decent but not standout opportunity—highlighting a middle-ground caution. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s defensive investor approves, but his enterprising counterpart dismisses it as lacking the deep bargain appeal he sought. At the opposite end, Jesse Livermore’s low score and Peter Lynch’s rejection underscore a lack of clear momentum or growth-at-a-reasonable-price, while Philip Fisher and Thorstein Veblen’s critiques imply either stagnant quality or speculative overreach. The divide between high-cycle enthusiasm and skepticism from trend-followers and growth-focused investors creates a polarized debate.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 78
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 53
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 47
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 32
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 19
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.1%
Operating Margin
15.7%
Net Margin
12.3%
EBITDA Margin
16.4%
ROE
16.3%
ROA
9.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$13.60
Cash
$1.26B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.7.2026 | $0.260 |
| 9.7.2026 | $0.260 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.260 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.260 |
| 9.1.2026 | $0.250 |
| 8.1.2026 | $0.250 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.250 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.250 |
| 11.7.2025 | $0.250 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.250 |
| 11.4.2025 | $0.250 |
| 10.4.2025 | $0.250 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$133.06
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$161.44
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+21.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.3% | $1.05B | $963.13M |
| 2 | 2.3% | $1.07B | $904.36M |
| 3 | 2.4% | $1.10B | $849.60M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $1.13B | $798.55M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.16B | $750.93M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.03B
Terminal Value
$18.22B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$11.84B
Enterprise Value
$16.11B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$16.11B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$82.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$82.89
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TOL currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TOL's estimated fair value is $161.44, which is 21.3% above the current price of $133.06. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TOL's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $161.44 vs. price $133.06 (+21.3%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; P/E: 9.9.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 19.5% / max drawdown 46.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -10.1%; Net income growth: -14.3%.
Yes — TOL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 77,957 | -77,957 | $156.58 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 77,957 | -77,957 | — |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 77,957 | +77,957 | $31.61 |
| Parahus Robert | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $149.66 |
| Parahus Robert | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 23,457 | -7,500 | $149.66 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 399,213 | +77,957 | $31.61 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 321,256 | -77,957 | $156.58 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 0 | -77,957 | — |
| East Stephen F. | Open Market Sale | 15.4.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $139.70 |
| East Stephen F. | Open Market Sale | 15.4.2026 | 13,442 | -1,000 | $139.70 |
| McLean John A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 2,313 | -2,313 | — |
| McLean John A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 2,313 | +2,313 | $31.61 |
| McLean John A | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 2,313 | -2,313 | $153.43 |
| McLean John A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 19,682 | +2,313 | $31.61 |
| McLean John A | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 17,369 | -2,313 | $153.43 |
| McLean John A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 0 | -2,313 | — |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.2.2026 | 27,014 | -27,014 | — |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 27,014 | -27,014 | $159.15 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.2.2026 | 27,014 | +27,014 | $31.61 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.2.2026 | 348,270 | +27,014 | $31.61 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 321,256 | -27,014 | $159.15 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.2.2026 | 77,957 | -27,014 | — |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.2.2026 | 45,116 | -45,116 | — |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Open Market Sale | 24.2.2026 | 2,103 | -2,103 | $161.04 |
| Yearley Douglas C. Jr. | Open Market Sale | 24.2.2026 | 43,013 | -43,013 | $160.39 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,802,929 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,298,809 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology