Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$47.49
▼ $0.62 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:31 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.97B
Day Range
$47.09 - $48.26
52-Week Range
$28.10 - $55.47
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$39.95
Resistance
$51.08
SDRL is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+43.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.21
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -5.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $50.55
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 25 to 51 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
55
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
34
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Seadrill Limited (SDRL) has highlighted its improved financial performance and operational execution, particularly in Q2 2026. Analysts noted a stronger-than-expected quarter, with raised full-year guidance for revenue and adjusted EBITDA, alongside positive investor sentiment. Discussions also emphasized its undemanding valuation and decent growth prospects, though broader industry comparisons and competitive pressures were briefly addressed. The focus remained on operational efficiency and cautious optimism amid offshore energy sector dynamics.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Seadrill Limited Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
34
Technical
55
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here suggests a dominant narrative of *euphoria*—driven by strong momentum, a slight premium over long-term averages, and universally positive sentiment. The disconnect between narrative (65) and reality (36) further implies traders may be overestimating fundamentals or ignoring peer underperformance. However, the lack of extreme volatility or panic signals keeps the bias contained. The key question is whether this euphoria is justified by fundamentals or merely speculative momentum.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:28 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Seadrill management raised full-year guidance for revenue and adjusted EBITDA (Article 5)"
"Seadrill (SDRL) is up 9.8% after boosting 2026 guidance (Article 11)"
"Seadrill stock is a Buy due to improved execution and undemanding valuation (Article 5)"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep philosophical and methodological divides among the historical investors. Benjamin Graham’s high scores—especially for a defensive investor—suggest strong fundamental safety margins, while his enterprising counterpart still sees a compelling bargain. In contrast, Fisher and Veblen’s near-zero scores highlight a stark contrast: the stock lacks the long-term growth momentum or intrinsic quality they demanded, instead appearing speculative or driven by superficial excitement. Meanwhile, mid-tier scores from Marks, Housel, and Nelson indicate a stock that’s neither a slam dunk nor a clear pass, caught between cyclical positioning and moderate risk. Livermore’s neutrality and Bagehot’s lukewarm liquidity assessment further imply a lack of decisive momentum or market depth, leaving it in a gray zone for traders and contrarians alike.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 89
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 79
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 78
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 65
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 47
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 42
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 42
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 15
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
3.3%
Net Margin
-5.4%
EBITDA Margin
19.8%
ROE
-2.7%
ROA
-2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$339.00M
Total Debt
$613.00M
Current Ratio
2.03
Debt/Equity
0.21
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$43.97
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$43.97
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
StockStory · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
Seadrill Limited Common (SDRL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SDRL currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SDRL's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.21; Current ratio: 2.03; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -5.4% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.01 (3y annualized return 0.7% / max drawdown 66.1%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SDRL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wieggers Marcel | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 1 | -1 | $44.61 |
| Creed Grant R | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 6,195 | -6,195 | $44.20 |
| Wieggers Marcel | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 13,474 | -13,474 | $44.94 |
| Creed Grant R | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 27,952 | -27,952 | $44.92 |
| Wieggers Marcel | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 1 | -13,474 | $44.94 |
| Wieggers Marcel | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 0 | -1 | $44.61 |
| Creed Grant R | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 51,016 | -6,195 | $44.20 |
| Creed Grant R | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 23,064 | -27,952 | $44.92 |
| Strickler Todd D | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 31,409 | -31,409 | $44.69 |
| Sauer-Petersen Torsten | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 42,625 | -42,625 | $44.68 |
| Strickler Todd D | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 0 | -31,409 | $44.69 |
| Sauer-Petersen Torsten | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 0 | -42,625 | $44.68 |
| CAHUZAC JEAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| Quarls Harry | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| Zambelli Ana | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| SCHULTZ ANDREW ELIOT | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| Smith Paul Norman | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| ROBERTSON JULIE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,272 | +3,272 | — |
| Kjaervik Jan | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| Swinney Jonathan | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| CAHUZAC JEAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| ROBERTSON JULIE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 3,272 | +3,272 | — |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
| SCHULTZ ANDREW ELIOT | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 2,618 | +2,618 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,673,463 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,610,712 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
29.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology