Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$76.80
▲ $0.77 (+1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:06 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$399.28B
Day Range
$76.35 - $76.96
52-Week Range
$70.03 - $94.64
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$74.56
Resistance
$85.02
NGG is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+9.1% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 2/12 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.6% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.28 (3y annualized return 6.8% / max drawdown 24.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
29
Risk
50
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **National Grid Transco PLC** and **National Grid PLC** has centered on major infrastructure investments and strategic partnerships. The company is advancing its **Great Grid Upgrade** in the UK, including a £400 kV substation contract with GE Vernova for grid reliability. Additionally, National Grid is collaborating with **Method Grid** to digitize capital project delivery, while studies highlight how **transmission expansion**—particularly in the PJM region—could save U.S. electricity customers up to **$15.3 billion** by improving efficiency, reliability, and national security. The focus reflects a push for scalable growth and technological modernization.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about National Grid Transco PLC National Grid PLC (NEW). News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
11
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
35
Fundamentals
—
Technical
29
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (77) reflects traders fixating on a near-term support level (1.1% away), likely due to its technical proximity. While FOMO and panic signals are muted by weak momentum and neutral RSI, the narrative gap (5-point divergence) hints at a disconnect between optimistic sentiment (86/100) and technical reality. The key question: will traders break free from the support anchor, or will the gap widen as sentiment outpaces fundamentals? Low volatility (0.94x ATR) suggests caution, not panic, but the support proximity remains the psychological fulcrum.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:24 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Transmission expansion could spur billions in savings, especially in PJM: study"
"National Grid plc is a long-term buy: a £70bn plan targets 10% asset growth to FY2031, powered by UK transmission and AI/data centers"
"National Grid partners with Method Grid to digitise capital project delivery"
"GE Vernova to Deliver 400 kV Substation Supporting UK Grid Upgrade"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: those leaning cautiously bullish and those dismissing it outright. Samuel Nelson and Edgar Smith’s near-perfect scores suggest a cyclical opportunity or a dividend-growth play, respectively, though Smith’s verdict hinges on incomplete data. Meanwhile, Morgan Housel and Charles Mackay’s high scores imply a quiet, patient-friendly investment with no crowd-driven hype—aligning with their principles of compounding and avoiding mania. Conversely, the low scores from Livermore, Veblen, and the efficient-market camp paint a picture of a stock either trending downward or lacking intrinsic value, with Veblen’s critique hinting at speculative overreach. The middle-ground approaches—like Marks’ mixed verdict or Loeb’s capital-preservation stance—reflect uncertainty, balancing potential upside against already high expectations or weak edge cases.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 80
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 59
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 6 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.5.2026 | $2.174 |
| 28.5.2026 | $2.174 |
| 21.11.2025 | $1.066 |
| 20.11.2025 | $1.066 |
| 30.5.2025 | $2.055 |
| 29.5.2025 | $2.055 |
| 22.11.2024 | $1.020 |
| 21.11.2024 | $1.020 |
| 7.6.2024 | $2.494 |
| 6.6.2024 | $2.494 |
| 31.5.2024 | $3.506 |
| 30.5.2024 | $3.506 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
CorpGov.com · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
PR Newswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Utility Dive · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for National Grid Transco PLC National Grid PLC (NEW) (NGG) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for NGG specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
NGG's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.6% of price; Price is above the SAR point — uptrend.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.28 (3y annualized return 6.8% / max drawdown 24.3%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — NGG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 1 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL GRID PLC | Open Market Sale | 15.2.2018 | 6,783,373 | -6,783,373 | $25.26 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,193,698 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 752,736 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
24.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology