Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$21.19
▼ $0.06 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:30 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$10.06B
Day Range
$21.10 - $21.58
52-Week Range
$16.96 - $23.84
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$21.03
Resistance
$23.35
AM is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+13.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 1.63
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
68
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Antero Midstream Corporation** has focused on its financial flexibility and strategic growth in natural gas infrastructure. The company received attention for a one-time cash windfall that boosted liquidity, while broader industry trends highlighted expanding midstream capacity in the Permian Basin to accommodate rising gas production. Analysts also examined its stock performance post-earnings, noting a 4.6% gain and assessing future potential. No unrelated corporate actions or major controversies were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Antero Midstream Corporation. News trend score: 62. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
68
Technical
23
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **herding** behavior reflects synchronized movement between AM and its peers, with both rising modestly (+0.6% vs. +0.5%). This suggests traders are aligning with peer momentum rather than independent analysis. The **anchoring** score (34) hints at traders focusing on resistance (3.3% away), while **FOMO** (18) indicates mild excitement without panic. The **narrative gap** (10-point discrepancy) implies a slight disconnect between market perception and reality, but no extreme mispricing. The key question: *Will traders break from the herd if AM stalls near resistance?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:09 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported second-quarter 2026 results showing revenue of US$327.24 million versus US$305.47 million a year earlier, while net income declined to US$113.52 million from US$124.51 million, with earnings per share easing to US$0.24 from US$0.26"
"ongoing share repurchases totaling 11,031,664 shares for US$190.03 million since February 2024"
"start of its Eastside Express pipeline, underscoring management’s expansion efforts"
"Antero Midstream (AM) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a cautious 80—where Charles Mackay sees no obvious crowd mania—to a resounding 19, where Peter Lynch would dismiss it outright for failing his growth-at-a-reasonable-price test. The middle ground is occupied by investors like Philip Fisher and Walter Bagehot, who acknowledge solid fundamentals or adequate liquidity but stop short of calling it exceptional, while more cyclical or defensive thinkers like Howard Marks (Market Cycle) or Samuel Armstrong Nelson flag potential overvaluation or stretched conditions. Meanwhile, the most bearish frameworks—Graham’s defensive criteria, Schwager’s trading discipline, and Lynch’s growth focus—converge in rejecting the stock entirely, contrasting sharply with Mackay’s relative optimism about avoiding speculative frenzy. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s risks (volatility, stretched valuations, or lack of clear edge) outweigh its modest strengths, with even the most bullish voices here admitting it’s not a standout pick.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 69
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 67
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 55
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 53
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 21
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 19
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$21.03
Range Bottom
$23.35
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
54.2%
Net Margin
34.8%
EBITDA Margin
54.2%
ROE
21.0%
ROA
7.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.86
Cash
$180.44M
Total Debt
$3.22B
Current Ratio
3.41
Debt/Equity
1.63
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.7.2026 | $0.225 |
| 28.7.2026 | $0.225 |
| 29.4.2026 | $0.225 |
| 28.4.2026 | $0.225 |
| 28.1.2026 | $0.225 |
| 27.1.2026 | $0.225 |
| 22.10.2025 | $0.225 |
| 21.10.2025 | $0.225 |
| 23.7.2025 | $0.225 |
| 22.7.2025 | $0.225 |
| 23.4.2025 | $0.225 |
| 22.4.2025 | $0.225 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$4.09
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.86
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 12 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
PR Newswire · 18.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 9.8.2026
Yahoo · 9.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
Yahoo · 8.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AM currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AM's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 21.0% — strong; Current ratio: 3.41.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 1.63; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — AM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLIMLEY BROOKS J | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $21.27 |
| KLIMLEY BROOKS J | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 68,204 | -5,000 | $21.27 |
| Pearce Sheri | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 16,000 | -16,000 | $22.01 |
| Pearce Sheri | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 83,900 | -16,000 | $22.01 |
| Chisholm Nancy | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| Munoz Jeffrey S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| MCARDLE JANINE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| DEA PETER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| Keenan W Howard JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| KEYTE DAVID H | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 3,225 | +3,225 | — |
| KLIMLEY BROOKS J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| MOLLENKOPF JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 1,907 | +1,907 | — |
| DEA PETER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 68,808 | +1,907 | — |
| KEYTE DAVID H | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 117,903 | +3,225 | — |
| MOLLENKOPF JOHN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 106,566 | +1,907 | — |
| KLIMLEY BROOKS J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 73,204 | +1,907 | — |
| MCARDLE JANINE J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 82,424 | +1,907 | — |
| Keenan W Howard JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 157,691 | +1,907 | — |
| Munoz Jeffrey S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 13,404 | +1,907 | — |
| Chisholm Nancy | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 34,208 | +1,907 | — |
| Schultz Yvette K | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 69,269 | -69,269 | $21.90 |
| Kennedy Michael N. | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | $21.92 |
| Kennedy Michael N. | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 1,500,594 | -100,000 | $21.92 |
| Schultz Yvette K | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 580,565 | -69,269 | $21.90 |
| DEA PETER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.4.2026 | 1,617 | +1,617 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,084,340 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,912,620 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology