Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$223.54
▲ $5.55 (+2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:57 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$210.30 - $224.65
52-Week Range
$73.52 - $299.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$145.80
Resistance
$280.83
NBIS is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+137.5% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 7/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 4.36 (3y annualized return 254.3% / max drawdown 58.3%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 7.7% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Nebius (NBIS) exhibits a strong technical foundation with a score of 83, driven by consistent bullish signals such as its price remaining above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram indicating upward momentum, and an RSI of 60.2 suggesting healthy upward momentum. However, the stock is currently overbought (%K at 81.9), which may signal potential short-term volatility or a pullback. The news category scores a perfect 100, reflecting a recent surge in positive sentiment—including a 12% intraday gain, a partnership with Palantir, and broader sectoral tailwinds in tech stocks—though a single negative headline (geopolitical tensions affecting crude oil) is overshadowed by the overwhelmingly positive narrative. Risk remains the weakest category at 50, primarily due to a high ATR (7.7% of price) and a volatility metric (Keltner Channel) showing a maximum 3-year drawdown of 58.3%, indicating potential for significant short-term fluctuations despite the strong long-term returns (278% over three years).
The stock price is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 60.2 indicating bullish momentum, though it is currently overbought (%K at 81.9).
These technical indicators suggest strong short-to-medium-term momentum, but overbought conditions may signal caution for near-term traders.
Recent news is overwhelmingly positive, including a 12% intraday gain, a partnership with Palantir, and sectoral tailwinds in tech stocks, despite one negative headline about geopolitical tensions.
Positive news drives investor sentiment and can sustain upward price movements, while negative headlines may introduce temporary volatility.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR at 7.7% of price) and a maximum 3-year drawdown of 58.3%, despite strong long-term returns (278% over three years).
High volatility and drawdown potential indicate potential for significant price swings, which may deter risk-averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
Nebius (NBIS) demonstrates strong technical momentum and positive news-driven momentum, supported by a high investor score and recent partnerships. However, overbought conditions, high volatility, and declining volume introduce caution, particularly for short-term traders. The stock’s risk profile remains elevated due to volatility metrics, though long-term returns remain compelling. Investors should monitor execution of strategic partnerships and broader sectoral trends to assess future trajectory.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202670
This Week
78
7D Ago
↓ -8
Weakening
Technical
62
7D Ago: 83
↓ -21
News
100
7D Ago: 80
↑ +20
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $223.54
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 59)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $228.11
Evidence: attention score 68/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $227.93
Evidence: -3.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $227.93
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $232.63
Evidence: attention score 83/100
What happened after
10d ago · $232.63
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $240.35
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
10d ago · $240.35
Evidence: attention score 64/100
What happened after
10d ago · $243.34
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
11d ago · $243.88
Evidence: +7.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $243.88
Evidence: +15.5pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $243.88
Evidence: +7.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $246.35
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 42 day-over-day
What happened after
11d ago · $246.99
Evidence: +8.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $246.99
Evidence: attention score 80/100
What happened after
11d ago · $246.99
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
11d ago · $246.99
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
70 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
71
$221.97
Now
70
$223.54
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
62
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Nebius Group N.V. has centered on its strategic partnership with Palantir, announced on September 8, 2026. The focus is on Nebius being named Palantir’s preferred sovereign AI infrastructure partner, enabling companies to own rather than rent AI models. This collaboration has driven a notable stock price increase for Nebius, while Palantir’s stock saw a slight decline. The partnership emphasizes AI compute and inference infrastructure, positioning Nebius as a key player in the AI compute wars.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Nebius Group N.V.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
51
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
—
Technical
62
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
78
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant euphoric phase, where extreme positive sentiment and strong momentum create a feedback loop. Herding and FOMO reinforce this, as peers lag while NBIS rallies sharply. The 27-point narrative gap—where optimism (77) far exceeds reality (50)—implies detached expectations. The key question: is this momentum self-sustaining or vulnerable to reversion when fundamentals fail to justify the gap?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:10 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Palantir Names Nebius Its Preferred Sovereign AI Partner"
"Nebius Stock Jumps on Palantir AI Infrastructure Partnership"
"Let Companies Own Their AI Models, Not Rent Them"
"AI infrastructure demand is strong, but expectations and fragile financing raise risks"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 51/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between passive efficiency and outright caution, with only Burton Malkiel & John Bogle’s efficient-market approach giving this stock a qualified endorsement—suggesting it might fit within a broad index strategy. Meanwhile, the majority of value-oriented and fundamental investors—like Graham, Fisher, and Lynch—lack sufficient data to form a concrete opinion, leaving their models neutral. On the other end, risk-averse and cycle-sensitive thinkers, from Gerald Loeb to Morgan Housel, overwhelmingly flag this stock as dangerous, warning of overvaluation, stretched cycles, or volatility that would trigger exits. Even Jesse Livermore’s trend-following model hesitates, while behavioral economists like Veblen and Mackay see it as a speculative bubble. The divergence reflects a stark contrast between those who might tolerate it as a market-neutral play and those who see it as a high-risk speculative gamble.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 65
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 29
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 20.9.2026
Benzinga · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for NBIS specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
NBIS's technical score is 62/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 4.36 (3y annualized return 254.3% / max drawdown 58.3%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 7.7% of price; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -24.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NBIS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Grimme Arne | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Volozh Arkadiy | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Radinsky Kira | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Ryan Charles E | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Weigand Matthew Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Nave Ophir | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Alonso Sanchez Maria del Dado | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 470 | -470 | $196.00 |
| Bunina Elena | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,352 | +1,352 | — |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 196 | -196 | $277.86 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $277.02 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 300 | -300 | $275.80 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $272.76 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $273.78 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 600 | -600 | $270.44 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 700 | -700 | $271.75 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 404 | -404 | $267.87 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 496 | -496 | $266.78 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $264.75 |
| Ryan Charles E | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $268.61 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $258.55 |
| Boynton John Wilson IV | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $263.51 |
| Ryan Charles E | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 2,667 | -2,667 | $269.64 |
| Ryan Charles E | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 9,622 | -9,622 | $266.67 |
| Ryan Charles E | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 13,315 | -13,315 | $263.32 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
45,272,901 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 60,202,888 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology