Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$21.36
▼ $0.77 (-3.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:34 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$21.00 - $22.21
52-Week Range
$8.11 - $30.88
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$19.64
Resistance
$30.88
NAVN is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+7.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 30.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $13.24 vs. price $21.36 (-38.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $21.44
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 27 to 62 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
14d ago · $27.78
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
19
Risk
54
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
39
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Navan, Inc. has primarily centered on its **strategic technology partnership with Engine**, aimed at enhancing capabilities in business travel, alongside a **bullish stock outlook**. Analysts, including B of A Securities, have raised price targets and maintained a "Buy" rating, citing improved cash flow and a potential 43% undervaluation. The company’s stock has surged 71% year-to-date, though valuation debates persist. No other significant developments were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Navan, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
39
Technical
19
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests detached euphoria, where extreme valuation (+99% over DCF) and positive sentiment (98/100) override weak momentum (-4.8% ROC). Overconfidence and selective herd behavior further indicate investors prioritize narrative over fundamentals. The key open question is whether the narrative gap (28 points) will persist or if reality (fundamentals/valuation) will reassert itself. The absence of anchoring or loss aversion signals complacency despite overvaluation.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:01 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"B of A Securities analyst Nafeesa Gupta maintains Navan with a Buy and raises the price target from $26 to $34."
"Navan is up 71.0% year to date"
"Navan, Engine Announce Strategic Technology Partnership to Power New Capabilities in Business Travel"
"Navan (NAVN) Stock May Be 43% Undervalued As Cash Flow Improves"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between bullish, fundamental growth strategies and more cautious, cyclical, or contrarian approaches. Methodologies like Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Nelson’s cycle analysis score highly, suggesting resilience in downturns or a favorable market position, while Fisher, Smith, and Housel’s quality and long-term hold principles also see strong potential. Conversely, Graham’s stricter valuation tests and Livermore’s trend-following rule flag red flags, while Marks’ risk-averse stance and Veblen’s critique of speculative growth paint it as overvalued or late-cycle. The divide underscores whether NAVN’s fundamentals justify its price (per the top scorers) or if it’s overhyped (per the lower scorers), with even the 'enterprising' Graham and Schwager’s disciplined wizards warning against overreach.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 59
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 54
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 222 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
71.3%
Operating Margin
-28.0%
Net Margin
-56.7%
EBITDA Margin
-19.5%
ROE
-32.9%
ROA
-23.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$4.07
Cash
$583.52M
Total Debt
$124.80M
Current Ratio
4.07
Debt/Equity
0.10
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.36
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$13.24
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-38.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $40.94M | $37.56M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $48.88M | $41.14M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $55.60M | $42.93M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $60.11M | $42.59M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $61.62M | $40.05M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$32.75M
Terminal Value
$971.63M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$631.49M
Enterprise Value
$835.75M
Net Debt
$-458.72M
Equity Value
$1.29B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$12.35
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.69
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
TheStreet · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo Finance Video · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Motley Fool · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Navan, Inc. (NAVN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NAVN currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NAVN's estimated fair value is $13.24, which is 38.0% below the current price of $21.36. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NAVN's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 30.8%; Free cash flow growth: 163.7%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $13.24 vs. price $21.36 (-38.0%); Operating margin: -28.0% (negative); Net margin: -56.7% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NAVN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 688,653 | -75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 0 | -75,000 | $30.14 |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,086,242 | -168,378 | $30.14 |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | $30.14 |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | +75,000 | — |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | $30.14 |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 75,000 | -75,000 | $30.14 |
| Cohen Ariel M. | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 168,378 | -168,378 | $30.14 |
| HOROWITZ BENJAMIN A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 11,628 | +657 | $28.56 |
| ZEEV OREN | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 67,617 | +394 | $28.56 |
| Williams Anre D | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 226,029 | +412 | $28.56 |
| Kaveripatnam Sandesh | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 46,205 | +394 | $28.56 |
| Liang Clara | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 10,397 | +438 | $28.56 |
| ZEEV OREN | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 394 | +394 | $28.56 |
| HOROWITZ BENJAMIN A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 657 | +657 | $28.56 |
| Kaveripatnam Sandesh | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 394 | +394 | $28.56 |
| Liang Clara | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 438 | +438 | $28.56 |
| Williams Anre D | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 412 | +412 | $28.56 |
| Lightspeed Venture Partners X, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 8,983 | -8,983 | $25.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,715,044 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,864,799 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology