Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$1,776.33
▼ $11.32 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:16 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$22.01B
Day Range
$1,771.76 - $1,791.74
52-Week Range
$1,719.41 - $2,207.59
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$1,767.60
Resistance
$2,054.37
-7.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $3,761.93 vs. price $1,776.33 (+111.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 5.2% / max drawdown 20.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
26
Risk
56
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Markel Group Inc. has centered on leadership changes, strategic expansions, and financial stability. Notably, Chairman Steve Markel announced his retirement, with CEO Tom Gayner set to succeed him. The company also expanded its small business workers' compensation offerings in California through a partnership with Midwest General Insurance Agency. Additionally, Markel maintained its strong financial ratings from AM Best, reinforcing its creditworthiness amid mixed share price performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Markel Group Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
80
Fundamentals
65
Technical
26
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on a narrow support level (0.2% above), ignoring broader valuation gaps (-53% vs. DCF). Herding is active but muted, likely due to relative underperformance (-2.2% vs. peers). Low volatility (0.82x ATR) and neutral RSI (38) rule out panic or euphoria, leaving traders anchored to a technical threshold. The key question: Will the 0.2% support hold, or will traders break free of this anchor?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Markel to expand California small business workers compensation offering"
"Markel Group Chairman Steve Markel to Step Down; CEO Tom Gayner Named Successor"
"AM Best reaffirmed its A+ Financial Strength Rating and 'aa-' Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating"
"Markel Group (MKL) Holds Its A+ Rating As An Undervalued Narrative Sticks"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for MKL reflects deep methodological contrasts between value, cycle, and behavioral frameworks. The top scorers—Bagehot, Graham, and Nelson—prioritize defensive, liquidity-driven, or cyclical positioning, all seeing the stock as resilient or undervalued relative to its fundamentals or market positioning. Meanwhile, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen’s low scores stem from a focus on growth quality or institutional integrity, dismissing MKL as lacking the sustained momentum or ethical alignment they demand. Even within value schools, Graham’s *enterprising* variant pulls back, flagging it as merely a modest discount rather than a deep bargain, while Livermore’s trend-following rule outright rejects it. The middle ground—Marks, Housel, and Schwager—balances risk and reward, acknowledging potential but without the same conviction as the top-tier methodologies.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 99
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 97
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 83
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 81
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 60
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 53
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 37
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 27
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
20.6%
Net Margin
13.6%
EBITDA Margin
22.8%
ROE
11.3%
ROA
3.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$169.74
Cash
$3.96B
Total Debt
$4.30B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.23
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1,776.33
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$3,761.93
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+111.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.3% | $2.82B | $2.58B |
| 2 | 8.3% | $3.05B | $2.57B |
| 3 | 6.4% | $3.25B | $2.51B |
| 4 | 4.4% | $3.39B | $2.40B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $3.47B | $2.26B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.55B
Terminal Value
$54.78B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$35.60B
Enterprise Value
$47.92B
Net Debt
$339.11M
Equity Value
$47.58B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1,470.41
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1,125.29
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
CNW Group · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Markel Group Inc. (MKL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MKL currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MKL's estimated fair value is $3,761.93, which is 111.8% above the current price of $1,776.33. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MKL's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $3,761.93 vs. price $1,776.33 (+111.8%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.6% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 5.2% / max drawdown 20.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -15.1%; Net income growth: -23.3%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MKL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crowley Andrew G. | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 7.481 | +7.481 | $1,730.49 |
| Crowley Andrew G. | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 2,749 | +7 | $1,730.49 |
| Costanzo Brian J. | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 2.164 | +2.164 | $1,617.19 |
| Crowley Andrew G. | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 2.817 | +2.817 | $1,617.19 |
| Costanzo Brian J. | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 1,632 | +2 | $1,617.19 |
| Crowley Andrew G. | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 2,741 | +3 | $1,617.19 |
| OREILLY MICHAEL | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 89.893 | +89.893 | $1,668.65 |
| MICHAEL JONATHAN E | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 65.922 | +65.922 | $1,668.65 |
| Leopold Diane | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 65.922 | +65.922 | $1,668.65 |
| Morrison Harold Lawrence Jr. | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 32.961 | +32.961 | $1,668.65 |
| Puckett A. Lynne | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 65.922 | +65.922 | $1,668.65 |
| Housel Morgan E. | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 65.922 | +65.922 | $1,668.65 |
| Besca Mark | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 80.904 | +80.904 | $1,668.65 |
| Cunningham Lawrence A | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 32.961 | +32.961 | $1,668.65 |
| MICHAEL JONATHAN E | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 333 | +66 | $1,668.65 |
| OREILLY MICHAEL | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 3,935 | +90 | $1,668.65 |
| Morrison Harold Lawrence Jr. | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 1,127 | +33 | $1,668.65 |
| Puckett A. Lynne | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 507 | +66 | $1,668.65 |
| Leopold Diane | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 2,345 | +66 | $1,668.65 |
| Cunningham Lawrence A | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 1,042 | +33 | $1,668.65 |
| Besca Mark | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 1,222 | +81 | $1,668.65 |
| Housel Morgan E. | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 1,029 | +66 | $1,668.65 |
| Harris Greta J | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 35 | -35 | $1,846.12 |
| Harris Greta J | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 27 | -27 | $1,848.83 |
| Harris Greta J | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 14 | -14 | $1,847.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
259,225 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 246,071 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology