Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$338.92
▲ $4.92 (+1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:45 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$88.38B
Day Range
$332.35 - $340.57
52-Week Range
$256.76 - $410.98
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$320.91
Resistance
$384.23
MAR is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+28.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.43
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
84/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+9.9%
Median 40D Outcome
79/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
100%
+4.1% … +9.1%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
0%
— … —
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 100% (95% CI 80%–100%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +5.6%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
2 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.0% | -0.2% … +4.8% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 80% (55%–93%) | +3.8% | +1.8% … +6.5% | +1.0% |
| 20D | 100% (80%–100%) | +5.6% | +4.1% … +9.1% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 87% (62%–96%) | +9.9% | +5.8% … +16.1% | +2.8% |
| 60D | 87% (62%–96%) | +17.0% | +4.6% … +18.9% | +4.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-21 | 84/100 | Downtrend | +4.8% | -7.1% |
| 2019-10-15 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +9.4% | +20.0% |
| 2025-09-24 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +3.8% | +17.0% |
| 2025-10-09 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +5.6% | +20.9% |
| 2023-03-20 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +6.5% | +11.3% |
| 2024-06-11 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +3.1% | -2.2% |
| 2021-09-07 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +16.0% | +6.3% |
| 2023-11-06 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +6.0% | +28.2% |
| 2023-04-12 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +8.8% | +18.3% |
| 2025-06-20 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +4.4% | +3.0% |
| 2025-08-08 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +3.1% | +1.5% |
| 2026-03-25 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +12.7% | +17.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +15.4% | +19.5% |
| 2024-08-09 | 77/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +4.9% | +17.6% |
| 2025-09-10 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +2.1% | +12.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
38
Risk
48
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
49
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING MAR...
Recent media coverage of Marriott International highlights its strategic tech investments, particularly its collaboration with LG to develop an advanced cloud-based in-room entertainment platform aimed at modernizing guest experiences. The company has also expanded its presence in Japan with its first Westin resort in Hokkaido, leveraging franchise deals to grow its upscale brand. Additionally, there are reports of a major South Coast oceanfront resort temporarily closing, while minor updates include resolving a long-standing guest inconvenience in hotel rooms. Investor attention remains focused on Marriott’s tech push amid recent share price declines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Marriott International. News trend score: 68. Reason: 4 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
49
Technical
38
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme anchoring (96) at 0.2% above support suggests traders are fixated on this technical level, ignoring broader weakness. Herding (66) and loss aversion (49) indicate passive alignment with peers and reluctance to cut losses, while muted FOMO (8) and panic (26) imply restrained behavior. The key question: will traders break the anchor when support is tested, or will the narrative gap (6-point divergence) prompt reassessment? Low volatility and neutral sentiment further dampen impulsive moves.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:45 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"co-developing a cloud-based guest room entertainment platform (article 6)"
"first Westin Resort in Hokkaido, Japan (article 8)"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing it as a strong buy-and-hold candidate while others dismiss it outright. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score and call for a cycle position closer to oversold reflect a technical or momentum-driven view, suggesting a favorable timing window. Meanwhile, patient, long-term investors like Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith also rate it highly, framing it as a quiet compounder or decade-long hold—implying strong fundamentals or undervaluation. However, more cautious or contrarian voices like Jesse Livermore and Benjamin Graham’s Enterprising Investor model reject it entirely, with Livermore flagging a negative trend and Graham’s rules failing entirely, signaling either overvaluation or structural risk. The middle ground—from Howard Marks to Philip Fisher—reveals nuanced skepticism, with some seeing potential but tempered by high expectations or lack of Fisher’s signature growth quality, while others like Walter Bagehot and the efficient-market theorists question liquidity or the stock’s ability to outperform broader indices.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 78
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 55
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 55
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 36
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
15.8%
Net Margin
9.9%
EBITDA Margin
15.8%
ROE
-69.0%
ROA
9.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.53
Cash
$358.00M
Total Debt
$23.00M
Current Ratio
0.43
Debt/Equity
-0.01
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.730 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.730 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.730 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.670 |
| 25.2.2026 | $0.670 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.670 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.670 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.670 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.670 |
| 23.5.2025 | $0.670 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.670 |
| 27.2.2025 | $0.630 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
-$13.78
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$84.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 15 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Hotel Management Network · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Marriott International (MAR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MAR currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
MAR's technical score is 38/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: -0.01; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.43; Return on equity (ROE): -69.0% (negative); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — MAR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harrison Deborah Marriott | Other Transaction | 8.9.2026 | 2,000,000 | -2,000,000 | — |
| Marriott Juliana B. | Other Transaction | 8.9.2026 | 2,000,000 | -2,000,000 | — |
| Juliana B. Marriott Marital Trust | Other Transaction | 8.9.2026 | 2,000,000 | -2,000,000 | — |
| Marriott David S | Other Transaction | 8.9.2026 | 2,000,000 | -2,000,000 | — |
| Jones Neal | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 107 | -107 | $355.49 |
| LEWIS AYLWIN B | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 9.772 | +9.772 | $370.98 |
| Reid Grant | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 39.13 | +39.13 | $370.98 |
| Reid Grant | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 3,557 | +39 | $370.98 |
| LEWIS AYLWIN B | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 13,421 | +10 | $370.98 |
| MARRIOTT J W JR | Gift | 10.6.2026 | 17,500 | -17,500 | — |
| MARRIOTT J W JR | Gift | 10.6.2026 | 2,540,056 | -17,500 | — |
| Roe Peggy | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $361.56 |
| MARRIOTT J W JR | Gift | 18.5.2026 | 52 | -52 | — |
| Harrison Deborah Marriott | Gift | 18.5.2026 | 52 | +52 | — |
| MARRIOTT J W JR | Gift | 18.5.2026 | 2,557,556 | -52 | — |
| Roe Peggy | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 19,827 | -3,000 | $361.56 |
| Harrison Deborah Marriott | Gift | 18.5.2026 | 21,343 | +52 | — |
| Mao Yibing | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 4,816 | -4,816 | $347.72 |
| Mao Yibing | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 27,398 | -4,816 | $347.72 |
| ROZANSKI HORACIO | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 670 | +670 | — |
| Hill David Shawn | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 87 | +87 | $350.84 |
| Hobart Lauren R | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 670 | +670 | — |
| Tresvant Sean | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 670 | +670 | — |
| McCarthy Margaret M | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 670 | +670 | — |
| Reid Grant | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 670 | +670 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,034,748 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,611,626 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology