Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$53.73
▲ $0.86 (+1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/21 03:23 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$52.91 - $54.00
52-Week Range
$25.39 - $56.27
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$33.82
Resistance
$56.27
GCT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+81.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 21/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $121.99 vs. price $53.73 (+127.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202673
This Week
72
7D Ago
→ +1
Stable
Technical
75
7D Ago: 76
→ -1
Fundamental
74
7D Ago: 70
↑ +4
Growth
70
7D Ago: 70
→ 0
Valuation
67
7D Ago: 67
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Quality
63
7D Ago: 58
↑ +5
Risk
54
7D Ago: 48
↑ +6
Biggest Improvements
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
73
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $52.86
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 52 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
73 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 4, 2026
Then
70
$50.87
Now
73
$53.73
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
75
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **GigaCloud Technology Inc.** (NASDAQ: GCT) highlights its strong financial performance, with recurring themes of **exceptional growth, profitability, and undervaluation**. Analysts praise its **22.86% revenue growth**, solid margins, and **affordable valuation (11.89 P/E)**, while noting optimism over its **expansion into European markets** and **strong Q2 earnings**. Some reports also mention **insider selling** and **volatility risks**, though the overall sentiment remains **bullish**, with frequent "Buy" recommendations and expectations of a **25-26% upside** in the next year.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about GigaCloud Technology Inc. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
74
Technical
75
Valuation
67
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+56%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for GCT suggests a disconnect between extreme positive sentiment (100/100) and valuation metrics—trading 58% below DCF fair value while 27.6% above its 200-day average. This aligns with **Euphoria**, where optimism may be detached from fundamentals, despite weak momentum (-0.6% ROC). The narrative gap (10 points) hints at a potential misalignment between investor perception and objective reality. The key question is whether this disconnect will persist or if sentiment will correct as valuation pressures mount. The lack of panic selling (score: 2) or loss aversion (score: 0) further implies complacency, not urgency.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Record Revenue and EPS Amid..."
"The average brokerage recommendation (ABR) for GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT) is equivalent to a Buy."
"GigaCloud Technology Inc. is rated Buy with a 25-26% 12-month upside"
"Diversification to the high growth EU markets have driven GCT's robust top/bottom-line performance"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies diverge sharply on whether this stock merits investment, with scores ranging from Lynch’s cautious optimism (67) to Nelson’s outright skepticism (29). Lynch and Fisher see *some* growth potential but temper their enthusiasm, noting the price may already reflect most of the upside—Fisher even calls it ‘solid but not exceptional.’ Meanwhile, Graham’s stricter valuation tests and Nelson’s cyclical analysis flag red flags, warning of overvaluation or stretched market conditions. The middle ground—from Malkiel/Bogle’s ‘mixed case’ (54) to Marks’ late-cycle caution (38)—suggests the stock’s appeal is weak at best, lacking either a clear edge or statistical safety. Only a few, like Schwager (52) and Bagehot (57), lean neutral, while the most bearish (Loeb, Marks-cycle, Nelson) see it as risky or overbought, reflecting a broad consensus that this isn’t a standout pick.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 70
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 70
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 67
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 61
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 43
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 42
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 15
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
23.3%
Operating Margin
11.2%
Net Margin
10.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
28.3%
ROA
11.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.60
Cash
$379.78M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.02
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$53.73
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$121.99
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+127.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $228.48M | $209.62M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $272.75M | $229.57M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $310.26M | $239.57M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $335.46M | $237.65M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $343.85M | $223.48M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$182.79M
Terminal Value
$5.42B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.52B
Enterprise Value
$4.66B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$4.66B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.03
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Motley Fool · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 12.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
ChartMill · 18.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 8.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
GigaCloud Technology Inc (GCT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 73/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GCT currently scores 73/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GCT's estimated fair value is $121.99, which is 127.1% above the current price of $53.73. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GCT's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $121.99 vs. price $53.73 (+127.1%); Free cash flow growth: 28.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.5% of price; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; %K 84.4 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GCT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen Zhiwu | Open Market Sale | 16.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $52.96 |
| Chen Zhiwu | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $52.38 |
| Wu Lei | Other Transaction | 20.8.2026 | 413,942 | +413,942 | — |
| Wu Lei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 413,942 | +413,942 | — |
| Wu Lei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 413,942 | -413,942 | — |
| Chen Zhiwu | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 549 | +549 | — |
| VISSER JAN WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 549 | +549 | — |
| LEBENSBURGER KENNETH E JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 549 | +549 | — |
| Bernes Marshall | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $53.00 |
| WAN XIN | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 32,372 | -32,372 | $50.55 |
| WAN XIN | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 27,628 | -27,628 | $51.40 |
| WAN XIN | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 685,168 | -32,372 | $50.55 |
| WAN XIN | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 657,540 | -27,628 | $51.40 |
| SCHROCK IMAN AJ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 3,379 | -3,379 | $52.20 |
| SCHROCK IMAN AJ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 3,300 | -3,300 | $51.61 |
| Bernes Marshall | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $51.88 |
| Wu Lei | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Wu Lei | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 154,000 | -6,000 | — |
| SCHROCK IMAN AJ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 16,700 | -3,300 | $51.61 |
| SCHROCK IMAN AJ | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 20,000 | -3,379 | $52.20 |
| Bernes Marshall | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 63,150 | -5,000 | $51.88 |
| Wu Lei | Other Transaction | 4.6.2026 | 243,008 | +243,008 | — |
| Wu Lei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 243,008 | +243,008 | — |
| Wu Lei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 243,008 | -243,008 | — |
| Wu Lei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 286,058 | +243,008 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,632,332 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,433,182 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 71.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology