Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$110.96
▲ $2.43 (+2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$15.76B
Day Range
$109.30 - $111.94
52-Week Range
$60.50 - $157.01
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$103.82
Resistance
$139.98
LSCC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+54.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 3.09
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $12.67 vs. price $110.96 (-88.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
45
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
29
Risk
40
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
53
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation has centered on its stock performance and strategic initiatives amid broader semiconductor market trends. The company’s shares have faced an 11.3% decline since its last earnings report, raising investor concerns. Meanwhile, Lattice has highlighted its partnership with AMI to drive a $3 billion AI data center push, emphasizing growth in AI infrastructure and security solutions. Insider activity, including a high-profile executive selling shares, has also been noted, though analysts still point to Lattice’s long-term potential in niche semiconductor markets.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. News trend score: 80. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
53
Technical
29
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+33
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence—driven by a massive valuation disconnect (+827% vs. DCF)—suggests investors are ignoring weak momentum and fundamentals. The 40-point narrative gap (75 vs. 35) further implies a disconnect between hype and reality. Loss aversion may temper aggressive selling, but the lack of panic or FOMO signals cautious, selective positioning. The key question: *Will traders double down on the valuation premium despite deteriorating technicals?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:41 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ:LSCC) CEO Ford Tamer outlined how the companies’ combination is intended to address growing management, control and security demands across AI data centers"
"The semiconductor market was valued at $598.06 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach more than $1.47 trillion by 2034, representing a CAGR of 10.60%"
"Lattice Semiconductor is no longer simply recovering from the semiconductor inventory correction that hurt the business in 2024"
"Lattice Semiconductor SVP Elashmawi Sells 16,773 Shares for $2.3 Million — The insider's holdings still reflect confidence in Lattice Semiconductor."
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The debate reflects a sharp split between liquidity‑focused and value‑oriented frameworks: Walter Bagehot’s model rates the stock at 100 Republishing strong liquidity that would likely survive a credit squeeze, while Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria give it only 18, indicating a failure on safety and valuation grounds. Mid‑range scores from Livermore, Schwager, Mackay, and the efficient‑market view hover around the 50‑point mark, suggesting no clear trend or edge and a mixed case relative to an index. Risk‑averse perspectives such as Loeb (39), Housel (35), and Marks (27) flag the stock’s volatility and valuation as potential threats, whereas growth‑oriented thinkers like Fisher (19) and Lynch (11) find it lacking the quality or price‑reasonableness they require. Consequently, based on their documented principles, the model estimates that the stock sits at the intersection of strong liquidity but modest growth and valuation appeal, leading to divergent conclusions across the historical methodologies.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 19
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 11
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
68.2%
Operating Margin
2.1%
Net Margin
0.6%
EBITDA Margin
2.1%
ROE
0.4%
ROA
0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.02
Cash
$133.89M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
3.09
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$110.96
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$12.67
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-88.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $125.95M | $115.55M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $122.02M | $102.70M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $120.49M | $93.04M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $121.24M | $85.89M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $124.27M | $80.77M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$132.58M
Terminal Value
$1.96B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.27B
Enterprise Value
$1.75B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.75B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.17
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.85
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LSCC currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, LSCC's estimated fair value is $12.67, which is 88.6% below the current price of $110.96. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
LSCC's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 3.09; Price is above the 200-day average; Gross margin: 68.2% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $12.67 vs. price $110.96 (-88.6%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.1% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for LSCC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elashmawi Esam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 680 | -680 | $115.34 |
| Desale Pravin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 654 | -654 | $115.34 |
| Feanny Tracy Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 445 | -445 | $115.34 |
| Feanny Tracy Ann | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,880 | -1,880 | $126.43 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,934 | -1,934 | $132.79 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,828 | -1,828 | $135.83 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,200 | -1,200 | $136.59 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 8,882 | -8,882 | $134.95 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 438 | -438 | $132.67 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,898 | -1,898 | $133.77 |
| Feanny Tracy Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 270 | -270 | $132.67 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 593 | -593 | $130.46 |
| Feanny Tracy Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 367 | -367 | $130.46 |
| Desale Pravin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.8.2026 | 593 | -593 | $130.46 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 691 | -691 | $130.46 |
| Flores Lorenzo | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 2,741 | -2,741 | $128.32 |
| Flores Lorenzo | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 113,513 | -2,741 | $128.32 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 338 | -338 | $128.31 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 90,478 | -338 | $128.31 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 296 | -296 | $138.00 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.8.2026 | 90,816 | -296 | $138.00 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 805 | -805 | $132.46 |
| Shaikh Erhaan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 91,112 | -805 | $132.46 |
| Elashmawi Esam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 515 | -515 | $137.44 |
| Desale Pravin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 504 | -504 | $137.44 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,763,151 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,865,532 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology