Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$90.44
▼ $0.94 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/18 09:30 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$3.96B
Day Range
$89.93 - $91.86
52-Week Range
$77.77 - $142.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$81.13
Resistance
$108.20
ITRI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-22.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $149.72 vs. price $90.44 (+65.5%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 13.5% / max drawdown 43.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
23
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Itron, Inc. has focused on its stock valuation and market positioning within the inspection instruments and smart meter sectors. Analysts have debated whether Itron’s shares are undervalued, highlighting concerns about growth sustainability and reinvestment potential despite its profitability. Additionally, the company was noted alongside peers in a Q2 earnings comparison for inspection instruments stocks, while broader industry reports emphasized its role in the expanding smart meter data management market, projected to grow significantly by 2035. A single insider share sale was also reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Itron, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
39
Fundamentals
65
Technical
23
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+5
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ITRI’s psychology is fragmented but dominated by **euphoria**—driven by a +10% premium over its 200-day average and a 35% discount to DCF, despite weak momentum. Confirmation bias persists due to a +10-point narrative gap, even as fundamentals (flat revenue/margin) fail to justify the gap. FOMO is muted by low volume and neutral RSI, while panic-selling and anchoring are effectively neutralized by low volatility and distance from resistance. The key question: *Will the narrative gap close as fundamentals fail to materialize, or will traders double down on the premium?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:14 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Is Itron (ITRI) Stock Undervalued Right Now? — Zacks focuses on earnings estimates and revisions to determine potential"
"Itron Insider Sold Shares Worth $994,046, According to a Recent SEC Filing"
"Smart Meter Data Management Global Market to Reach $12.65B by 2035, Profiling Oracle, Landis+Gyr, Itron"
"Why Is Itron (ITRI) Down 3.4% Since Last Earnings Report?"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for ITRI split sharply between bullish and cautious camps, reflecting stark differences in their core principles. Lynch, Mackay, and Veblen all see strong growth potential—Lynch highlights undervaluation relative to earnings, Mackay detects rising crowd enthusiasm, and Veblen aligns growth with tangible value creation—all scoring above 68. Meanwhile, Graham’s conservative tests and Marks’ caution flag mixed signals, while Fisher and Bagehot acknowledge solid but unexceptional fundamentals or liquidity. The divide deepens with Livermore’s outright rejection (negative trend) and Schwager’s outright dismissal (no setup), contrasting sharply with Nelson’s cyclical optimism and Smith’s long-term skepticism. Even Marks’ market-cycle approach, scoring lowest, suggests ITRI sits mid-cycle, while Graham’s Enterprising Investor variant remains skeptical of its valuation. The debate hinges on whether ITRI’s momentum (favored by Lynch, Veblen) outweighs its structural risks (flagged by Livermore, Schwager) or if its mediocre metrics (Fisher, Bagehot) justify only modest exposure.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 73
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 65
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 56
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 56
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 45
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 28
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
37.7%
Operating Margin
13.2%
Net Margin
12.7%
EBITDA Margin
15.3%
ROE
17.5%
ROA
8.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.62
Cash
$1.02B
Total Debt
$1.25B
Current Ratio
1.80
Debt/Equity
0.73
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$90.44
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$149.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+65.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1% | $421.79M | $386.96M |
| 2 | 8.2% | $456.41M | $384.15M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $485.19M | $374.65M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $506.55M | $358.85M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $519.21M | $337.45M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$383.06M
Terminal Value
$8.19B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.32B
Enterprise Value
$7.16B
Net Debt
$227.93M
Equity Value
$6.94B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$37.06
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.22
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockStory · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
Itron, Inc. (ITRI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ITRI currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ITRI's estimated fair value is $149.72, which is 65.5% above the current price of $90.44. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ITRI's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $149.72 vs. price $90.44 (+65.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 25.5%; Free cash flow growth: 84.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 13.5% / max drawdown 43.6%); Revenue growth (last year): -3.0%; Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ITRI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 24 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Justin K | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 7,883 | -7,883 | $97.36 |
| Patrick Justin K | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 593 | -593 | $97.36 |
| Patrick Justin K | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 581 | -581 | $97.36 |
| Patrick Justin K | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 1,153 | -1,153 | $97.36 |
| Reeves Donald L. III | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 27,662 | -283 | $99.99 |
| Reeves Donald L. III | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 283 | -283 | $99.99 |
| Marcolini John F. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 12,683 | -331 | $98.79 |
| Hooper Joan S | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 118,440 | -455 | $98.79 |
| Deitrich Thomas | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 367,009 | -887 | $98.79 |
| Patrick Justin K | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 32,275 | -222 | $98.79 |
| Wright David Marshall | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 8,671 | -76 | $98.79 |
| Reeves Donald L. III | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 27,945 | -329 | $98.79 |
| Pulatie-Hahn Laurie Ann | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 31,930 | -178 | $98.79 |
| Ware Christopher E. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 29,916 | -200 | $98.79 |
| Wright David Marshall | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 76 | -76 | $98.79 |
| Deitrich Thomas | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 887 | -887 | $98.79 |
| Ware Christopher E. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $98.79 |
| Marcolini John F. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 331 | -331 | $98.79 |
| Hooper Joan S | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 455 | -455 | $98.79 |
| Pulatie-Hahn Laurie Ann | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 178 | -178 | $98.79 |
| Reeves Donald L. III | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 329 | -329 | $98.79 |
| Patrick Justin K | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 222 | -222 | $98.79 |
| Reeves Donald L. III | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 247 | -247 | $98.87 |
| Reeves Donald L. III | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 28,274 | -247 | $98.87 |
| Hooper Joan S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 1,443 | -1,443 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,230,253 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,962,964 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
72.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 78.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology