Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$76.76
▲ $0.33 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:13 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$6.33B
Day Range
$75.52 - $77.25
52-Week Range
$73.19 - $150.46
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$73.50
Resistance
$118.34
AAON is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-13.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 20.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
34
Risk
46
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
69
Institutional
20
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on AAON, Inc. focuses on its Q2 earnings performance and stock valuation in the HVAC and industrials sectors. Financial outlets recognized AAON
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AAON, Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
69
Technical
34
Valuation
45
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-44%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AAON’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, consistent with a steep 3-month drawdown (-40.1%) and subdued trading activity (0.85x average volume). The market appears to prioritize preserving capital over chasing gains, with no signs of FOMO, herding, or euphoria. The narrative-reality gap (7 points) hints at lingering uncertainty, but the dominant state suggests traders are cautious rather than panicked. The key question: *Will the recent underperformance trigger further defensive positioning, or will a rebound test the resolve of loss-averse holders?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:42 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"industrial businesses... have tumbled by 3% over the past six months. This performance is a stark contrast from the S&P 500’s 12.3% gain."
"trade negotiations between the United States and Canada broke down, sparking concerns over new 50% tariffs and retaliatory trade measures."
"AAON’s stock price has taken a beating... shedding 24.7% of its value."
"While some companies burn cash to fuel expansion, others struggle to turn spending into sustainable growth."
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AAON reflects a clash between defensive, cyclical, and growth-oriented methodologies. The highest-scoring approaches—Mackay’s crowd psychology, Marks’ market cycle analysis, and Bagehot’s liquidity focus—all suggest resilience and relative safety, with none detecting signs of speculative frenzy or systemic risk. Meanwhile, the lower-scoring frameworks, particularly Graham’s defensive investing and Veblen’s critique of unearned growth, dismiss the stock as either statistically overvalued or lacking the fundamental quality or trend momentum they demand. Even moderate-risk methodologies like Loeb’s and Housel’s caution against overconfidence, while still acknowledging some holdability, whereas Fisher, Lynch, and Livermore outright reject it for failing to meet their growth, valuation, or trend-based thresholds. The split underscores how AAON’s perceived risk-reward balance depends entirely on whether the investor prioritizes stability, cyclical positioning, or growth potential.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 82
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 79
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 69
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 39
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 36
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 19
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
26.8%
Operating Margin
10.1%
Net Margin
7.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.0%
ROA
6.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.32
Cash
$13.00K
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
2.63
Debt/Equity
0.46
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.100 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 18.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 26.11.2025 | $0.100 |
| 25.11.2025 | $0.100 |
| 5.9.2025 | $0.100 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.100 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.100 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.100 |
| 18.3.2025 | $0.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$10.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.93
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 6 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
StockStory · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
PR Newswire · 21.8.2026
AAON, Inc. (AAON) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AAON currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AAON's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 20.1%; Debt/equity: 0.46; Current ratio: 2.63.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.0% of price; Calmar: 0.15 (3y annualized return 7.5% / max drawdown 49.9%).
Yes — AAON has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASBJORNSON NORMAN H | Gift | 1.9.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Buttermore Robert L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,284 | +1,284 | — |
| Jermain Patrick John | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 1,284 | +1,284 | — |
| Shaub Matthew | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 3,136 | +457 | $76.42 |
| Shaub Matthew | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 457 | +457 | $76.42 |
| Thompson Rebecca | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 4,230 | -4,230 | $143.42 |
| Thompson Rebecca | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 0 | -4,230 | $143.42 |
| ASBJORNSON NORMAN H | Gift | 29.5.2026 | 88,000 | -88,000 | — |
| Fields Gary D | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 19,000 | -19,000 | $140.20 |
| ASBJORNSON NORMAN H | Gift | 29.5.2026 | 101,441 | -101,441 | — |
| Fields Gary D | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 15,252 | -19,000 | $140.20 |
| ASBJORNSON NORMAN H | Gift | 29.5.2026 | 11,582,401 | -101,441 | — |
| ASBJORNSON NORMAN H | Gift | 29.5.2026 | 1,201,290 | -88,000 | — |
| Fields Gary D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 21,173 | -21,173 | $48.91 |
| Fields Gary D | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 21,173 | -21,173 | $140.34 |
| Fields Gary D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 21,173 | +21,173 | $48.91 |
| Wichman Gordon Douglas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $27.58 |
| Wichman Gordon Douglas | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $140.39 |
| Wichman Gordon Douglas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $27.58 |
| Fields Gary D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 55,425 | +21,173 | $48.91 |
| Fields Gary D | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 34,252 | -21,173 | $140.34 |
| Fields Gary D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 0 | -21,173 | $48.91 |
| Wichman Gordon Douglas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 13,997 | +3,000 | $27.58 |
| Wichman Gordon Douglas | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 10,997 | -3,000 | $140.39 |
| Wichman Gordon Douglas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 21,250 | -3,000 | $27.58 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,692,553 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,985,017 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 71.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology