Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$62.67
▼ $0.47 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 01:12 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.62B
Day Range
$61.63 - $62.99
52-Week Range
$43.75 - $67.09
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$60.10
Resistance
$67.09
HTO is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+30.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.70
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $64.94
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 15 to 40 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
42
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
48
Institutional
67
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **H2O America** has centered on its **dividend performance** and **strategic acquisitions**, particularly in Texas. Analysts highlight its status as a **Dividend King**, noting strong returns and undervaluation potential, while regulatory approval for its subsidiary’s **Quadvest acquisition** signals expansion. Concerns about **dilution risks** and earnings pressure from growth investments have also been discussed, alongside a **price target increase to $72** by Baird analyst Davis Sunderland. Second-quarter earnings call insights further emphasized growth challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about H2O America. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
48
Technical
42
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+11%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for HTO suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (62 vs. 40) where optimism outweighs fundamentals, with **FOMO (31)** and **euphoria (22)** as dominant forces. Herding (26) hints at sector-wide momentum, while anchoring (24) may cap upside near resistance. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining or vulnerable to a correction?* Overconfidence (1) and detached sentiment (92/100) imply traders may overlook risks.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:10 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week August 30 — dividend activity recap for Champions, Contenders & Challengers"
"H2O America Receives Regulatory Approval for Texas Subsidiary’s Acquisition of Quadvest"
"Baird analyst raises H2O America price target from $67 to $72"
"H2O America Q2 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Growth and Challenges"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between growth-oriented and risk-averse methodologies. Thorstein Veblen’s high score suggests the stock aligns with his emphasis on real value creation, while the efficient-market camp’s lukewarm stance implies it lacks clear alpha potential. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—from Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria to Walter Bagehot’s liquidity concerns—flag it as risky or overvalued, with scores clustering in the mid-to-low 20s. Only a few, like Charles Mackay and Jesse Livermore, see mild speculative interest or indecision, but the consensus leans toward caution, with even the more lenient ‘Enterprising Investor’ framework dismissing it outright. The spread between Veblen’s optimism and the rest’s skepticism highlights a fundamental tension: whether the stock’s growth justifies its risk or if it’s a speculative gamble.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 52
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 29
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 19
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 10
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$60.10
Range Bottom
$67.09
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
22.2%
Net Margin
12.8%
EBITDA Margin
37.2%
ROE
6.7%
ROA
2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.93
Cash
$20.69M
Total Debt
$1.89B
Current Ratio
0.70
Debt/Equity
1.23
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $0.440 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.440 |
| 10.5.2026 | $0.440 |
| 9.2.2026 | $0.440 |
| 8.2.2026 | $0.440 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.420 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.420 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.420 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.420 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.420 |
| 11.5.2025 | $0.420 |
| 10.2.2025 | $0.420 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$43.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$24.48
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 20.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 28.7.2026
MarketBeat · 28.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Moby · 28.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Associated Press · 27.7.2026
MT Newswires · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
ChartMill · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
H2O America (HTO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HTO currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
HTO's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 200-day average; +9.9% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.70; Calmar: -0.02 (3y annualized return -0.7% / max drawdown 35.8%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — HTO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mattern Megan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.7.2026 | 1,154 | -1,154 | $61.97 |
| Mattern Megan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.7.2026 | 13,631 | -1,154 | $61.97 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Purchase | 7.7.2026 | 2,784 | +2,784 | $62.03 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Purchase | 7.7.2026 | 4,615,265 | +2,784 | $62.03 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Purchase | 7.7.2026 | 4,615,265 | +2,784 | $62.03 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 1,686 | -1,686 | $60.74 |
| Kelly Ann P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 88 | -88 | $60.74 |
| Walters Andrew F | Disposition to the Company | 1.7.2026 | 374 | -374 | $60.74 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 2,132 | +2,132 | $60.76 |
| Walters Andrew F | Disposition to the Company | 1.7.2026 | 26,461 | -374 | $60.74 |
| Kelly Ann P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 9,976 | -88 | $60.74 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 4,610,349 | -1,686 | $60.74 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 4,612,481 | +2,132 | $60.76 |
| Walters Andrew F | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 3,508 | -3,508 | — |
| Walters Andrew F | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 26,835 | -3,508 | — |
| Johnson A Kristen | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 0 | +0 | — |
| Johnson A Kristen | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 18,160 | +0 | — |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 4,581,034 | -1,435 | $57.52 |
| ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. | Open Market Purchase | 29.5.2026 | 4,612,035 | +31,001 | $57.62 |
| Rowe Nick Orlando | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| WALLACE CAROL P | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| Heather Hunt | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| KRUGER DENISE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| More Daniel B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
| KLEIN REBECCA A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.5.2026 | 1,947 | +1,947 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,186,435 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,082,968 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
75.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 74.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology