Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$155.04
▲ $0.23 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:38 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$154.16 - $157.43
52-Week Range
$134.18 - $206.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$154.39
Resistance
$194.13
H is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+9.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 0/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$7.70 vs. price $155.04 (-105.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
35
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
6
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
29
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) has centered on analyst optimism and strategic partnerships. Wolfe Research initiated coverage with an *Outperform* rating and a $203 price target, highlighting potential growth. Additionally, Hyatt announced a collaboration with Fit Bodies Inc., expanding its wellness-focused *All Inclusive Collection* with fitness programming. While earnings discussions mention Hyatt’s position in the travel sector, no major financial setbacks or operational changes were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Hyatt Hotels Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
95
Fundamentals
29
Technical
6
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-23%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (77) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.2% support level, likely due to its proximity. Loss aversion (32) hints at hesitation to crystallize losses amid a 13.9% drawdown, while FOMO and panic signals are muted by weak momentum and neutral volatility. The narrative gap (16) suggests traders may overestimate positive news (100/100 sentiment) relative to technical reality. The key question: will traders break support or hold near the anchor, or will loss aversion persist despite negative momentum?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:00 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wolfe Research initiates coverage of Hyatt Hotels (H) at Outperform"
"Fit Bodies, Inc.—the pioneering force in luxury fitness travel—today announced a landmark collaboration with Hyatt's Inclusive Collection"
"90% of business travelers say their hotel room is the only place they truly feel 'off the clock' during a work trip"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some models seeing it as a high-conviction opportunity while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued proposition. At the top of the spectrum, **Samuel Armstrong Nelson** and **Jack Schwager** both rate it favorably—Nelson’s cycle analysis suggests it’s near oversold, while Schwager’s disciplined, reward/risk-driven approach sees it as a structured trade. Meanwhile, **Charles Mackay**’s absence of crowd mania signals aligns with a more measured, non-speculative view. However, the middle tier—including **Howard Marks (cycle)** and **Edgar Lawrence Smith**—cautions that the stock sits in a neutral or transitional phase, lacking the clarity for a long-term hold. The lower half, dominated by **Graham, Fisher, and Lynch**, dismisses it outright, with Graham’s strict valuation rules and Fisher’s quality/growth standards failing entirely. Meanwhile, **Livermore and Loeb** warn of trend resistance and capital-threatening risk, while **Housel and Veblen** highlight volatility and speculative overreach. The contrast underscores a fundamental tension: technical/cycle-based traders see tactical upside, while fundamentalists and risk-averse investors see red flags.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 79
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 12
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 11
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 10
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 10
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 8
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-0.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-1.6%
ROA
-0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.55
Cash
$787.00M
Total Debt
$4.27B
Current Ratio
0.75
Debt/Equity
1.28
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 27.8.2026 | $0.150 |
| 29.5.2026 | $0.150 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.150 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 24.11.2025 | $0.150 |
| 23.11.2025 | $0.150 |
| 27.8.2025 | $0.150 |
| 26.8.2025 | $0.150 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 28.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.150 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$155.04
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$7.70
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-105.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
6.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6% | $169.44M | $155.45M |
| 2 | 5.6% | $178.85M | $150.53M |
| 3 | 4.5% | $186.95M | $144.36M |
| 4 | 3.5% | $193.53M | $137.10M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $198.37M | $128.93M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$159.00M
Terminal Value
$3.13B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.03B
Enterprise Value
$2.75B
Net Debt
$3.48B
Equity Value
$-735.57M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$34.91
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$24.60
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
StockStory · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 35/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
H currently scores 35/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, H's estimated fair value is -$7.70, which is 105.0% below the current price of $155.04. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
H's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$7.70 vs. price $155.04 (-105.0%); Net margin: -0.7% (negative); Current ratio: 0.75.
Yes — H has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRONICK SUSAN D | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,700 | -1,700 | $179.88 |
| Bottarini Joan | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 1,825 | -1,825 | $170.37 |
| Bottarini Joan | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 21,932 | -1,825 | $170.37 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 30,479 | -30,479 | $196.80 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 4,110 | -4,110 | $198.65 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 33,352 | -33,352 | $197.82 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 16,850 | -16,850 | $195.96 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 424,030 | -16,850 | $195.96 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 393,551 | -30,479 | $196.80 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 360,199 | -33,352 | $197.82 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 356,089 | -4,110 | $198.65 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 18,241 | -18,241 | $202.45 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 11,801 | -11,801 | $204.50 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 408 | -408 | $205.23 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 4,759 | -4,759 | $203.31 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 457,848 | -18,241 | $202.45 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 453,089 | -4,759 | $203.31 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 441,288 | -11,801 | $204.50 |
| HOPLAMAZIAN MARK SAMUEL | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 440,880 | -408 | $205.23 |
| Travis Tracey Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 125 | +125 | — |
| O'NEILL HEIDI | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 125 | +125 | — |
| Pritzker Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 125 | +125 | — |
| Travis Tracey Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 2,817 | +125 | — |
| O'NEILL HEIDI | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 3,008 | +125 | — |
| Pritzker Jason | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 33,117 | +125 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,694,237 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,543,005 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 69.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology