Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$141.90
▼ $5.20 (-3.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:12 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$141.85 - $146.63
52-Week Range
$87.89 - $353.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$112.02
Resistance
$167.38
DUOL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-51.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $195.29 vs. price $141.90 (+37.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.3% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $158.82
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
16d ago · $158.82
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
18d ago · $157.37
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 55)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
75
$146.04
Now
61
$141.90
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
46
Risk
46
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
80
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Duolingo, Inc. has centered on its **strong user growth and stock performance**, with daily active users surging 23% to 58.7 million while engagement outpaces monetization. Analysts like Evercore upgraded the stock to "Outperform," citing robust retention and dismissing fears of AI competition. The company’s stock has risen nearly 30% since its last earnings report, sparking speculation about sustained momentum amid investor optimism.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Duolingo, Inc.. News trend score: 38. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 6 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
24
Fundamentals
80
Technical
46
Valuation
62
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
15
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
-28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DUOL’s psychology score (30) reflects a detached, detached-from-reality euphoria—price remains 23.3% above its 200-day average despite weak momentum and a 25% discount to DCF fair value. The narrative gap (7 points) suggests traders may be ignoring fundamental growth (+3.6% EPS) while fixating on short-term sentiment (92/100) and relative strength. The absence of herding or panic signals implies no clear behavioral consensus, leaving open whether this detachment is rational optimism or misplaced confidence. The key question: will traders eventually reconcile the disconnect between price and fundamentals, or will external catalysts force a re-evaluation?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:08 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Duolingo's DAUs jump 23% to 58.7M, outpacing paid subscriber and booking growth"
"AI chatbot fears were overblown as user growth, retention, and engagement remain strong"
"Duolingo shares rose about 7% after Evercore ISI upgraded the stock and doubled its price target"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with some legendary investors seeing it as a high-potential opportunity while others flag it as overvalued or risky. Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher both rate it near-perfectly (96 and 95, respectively), praising its growth potential and exceptional quality—suggesting they’d focus on long-term fundamentals and competitive advantages. Conversely, more risk-averse or market-critical frameworks like Gerald M. Loeb, Samuel Armstrong Nelson, and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) score it poorly (25–39), warning of stretched valuations, overbought cycles, or late-stage risks. Meanwhile, mid-tier methodologies like Benjamin Graham and Burton Malkiel & John Bogle (40–58) remain neutral, questioning whether the stock’s merits justify active selection over passive strategies or traditional value thresholds. The divide underscores whether the stock’s growth narrative aligns with disciplined valuation or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 95
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 93
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 89
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 65
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 24
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
72.2%
Operating Margin
13.1%
Net Margin
39.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
30.7%
ROA
20.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.05
Cash
$1.04B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.61
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$141.90
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$195.29
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+37.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $462.16M | $424.00M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $551.70M | $464.36M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $627.56M | $484.59M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $678.55M | $480.70M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $695.51M | $452.04M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$369.73M
Terminal Value
$10.97B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.13B
Enterprise Value
$9.43B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$9.43B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$28.28
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 6 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DUOL currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DUOL's estimated fair value is $195.29, which is 37.6% above the current price of $141.90. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DUOL's technical score is 46/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $195.29 vs. price $141.90 (+37.6%); Revenue growth (last year): 38.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 355.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.3% of price; Calmar: -0.05 (3y annualized return -4.4% / max drawdown 83.3%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DUOL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GORDON WILLIAM B | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 3,483 | -3,483 | $145.91 |
| GORDON WILLIAM B | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,675 | -2,675 | $146.58 |
| GORDON WILLIAM B | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,742 | -2,742 | $144.59 |
| GORDON WILLIAM B | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 800 | -800 | $143.83 |
| GORDON WILLIAM B | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $151.64 |
| GORDON WILLIAM B | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 200 | -200 | $148.68 |
| Glance Natalie | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,037 | -1,037 | $138.19 |
| Glance Natalie | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 502 | -502 | $137.01 |
| Chen Stephen C. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,024 | -1,024 | $129.13 |
| Meese Robert | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,354 | -1,354 | $129.13 |
| Glance Natalie | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,751 | -2,751 | $129.13 |
| KRAWCHECK SALLIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 3,280 | +3,280 | — |
| KRAWCHECK SALLIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 1,312 | +1,312 | — |
| KRAWCHECK SALLIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 1,312 | +1,312 | — |
| KRAWCHECK SALLIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 4,592 | +3,280 | — |
| Schlosser Mario | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 140 | +140 | $124.76 |
| Lilly III John Osborne | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 118 | +118 | $124.76 |
| Bohutinsky Amy | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 130 | +130 | $124.76 |
| Shelton James H | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 120 | +120 | $124.76 |
| Shelton James H | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 11,753 | +120 | $124.76 |
| Bohutinsky Amy | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 7,658 | +130 | $124.76 |
| Lilly III John Osborne | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 9,023 | +118 | $124.76 |
| Schlosser Mario | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 4,262 | +140 | $124.76 |
| Chen Stephen C. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.6.2026 | 58 | -58 | — |
| Chen Stephen C. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.6.2026 | 58 | +58 | $14.42 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,573,914 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,263,743 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology