Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$11.88
▲ $1.86 (+18.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:47 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$11.23 - $12.41
52-Week Range
$8.11 - $14.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$9.51
Resistance
$14.80
DSP is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+26.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $18.01 vs. price $11.88 (+51.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $10.02
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 54 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
47
Value
57
Momentum
39
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
54
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Viant Technology Inc. highlights its strong financial performance and strategic growth in digital advertising and AI-driven solutions. Key themes include record Q2 revenue, a surge in connected TV (CTV) ad spending, and positive analyst upgrades with raised price targets. The company’s improving fundamentals, robust balance sheet, and expansion into enterprise markets have been emphasized as drivers of its stock valuation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Viant Technology Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
54
Technical
39
Valuation
57
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DSP’s market behavior suggests **FOMO dominance**, fueled by strong momentum (+8.6% ROC), extreme positive sentiment (100/100), and overbought conditions (RSI 60, %B 0.89). The narrative gap (62 vs. 38) hints at optimism outpacing fundamentals, while euphoria (27) reflects detached valuation (+15.4% above 200-day avg despite -26% DCF discount). Overconfidence (10) may stem from price outpacing EPS growth, but no panic or herding signals exist. The key question: *Will momentum sustain despite valuation mispricing?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:44 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"UBS analyst Lloyd Walmsley raises price target from $17 to $19"
"Viant Technology posts better-than-expected Q2 earnings, sees sales growth for Q3"
"Record revenue and CTV surge in Q2 2026 earnings call highlights"
"Viant Technology eyes enterprise growth as AI Outcomes gains ad spend"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
High-scoring models highlight favorable cyclical positioning, strong balance sheet resilience, and unpriced expansion, with Samuel Armstrong Nelson's framework rating the cycle position as oversold and Peter Lynch's methodology identifying a growth candidate whose price has not caught up to its performance. Walter Bagehot's model similarly estimates strong liquidity that would help the firm weather a credit squeeze. Conversely, momentum and strict qualitative frameworks raise significant red flags, as Jesse Livermore's rules heavily penalize the stock's negative price trend while Philip Fisher's principles show a lack of required quality and growth signatures. Furthermore, Benjamin Graham's enterprising model concludes the shares are not statistically cheap enough, creating a clear split between cycle-oriented perspectives and trend or strict valuation criteria.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 91
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 63
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 61
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 47
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 31
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
45.8%
Operating Margin
3.5%
Net Margin
2.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
4.4%
ROA
0.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.51
Cash
—
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
2.50
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$11.88
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$18.01
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+51.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
20.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.6% | $62.33M | $57.18M |
| 2 | 16.1% | $72.35M | $60.90M |
| 3 | 11.6% | $80.71M | $62.32M |
| 4 | 7.0% | $86.38M | $61.19M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $88.54M | $57.54M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$51.68M
Terminal Value
$1.40B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$907.43M
Enterprise Value
$1.21B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.21B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.81
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 8 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Trefis · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
MarketBeat · 13.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
Trefis · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
Moby · 11.8.2026
Viant Technology Inc. (DSP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DSP currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DSP's estimated fair value is $18.01, which is 51.6% above the current price of $11.88. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DSP's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $18.01 vs. price $11.88 (+51.6%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 157.1%; Net income growth: 253.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 7.7% of price; Calmar: 0.41 (3y annualized return 28.1% / max drawdown 68.6%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DSP.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MADDEN LARRY | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 26,020 | -26,020 | $13.03 |
| MADDEN LARRY | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 1,431 | -1,431 | $13.68 |
| MADDEN LARRY | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 398,371 | -1,431 | $13.68 |
| MADDEN LARRY | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 399,802 | -26,020 | $13.03 |
| Abrahams Craig Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 28,389 | +28,389 | — |
| Abrahams Craig Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 10,720 | +10,720 | — |
| Abrahams Craig Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 28,389 | +28,389 | — |
| Abrahams Craig Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 39,109 | +10,720 | — |
| MADDEN LARRY | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 2,814 | -2,814 | $10.69 |
| Vanderhook Christopher | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 4,304 | -4,304 | $10.47 |
| Vanderhook Timothy | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 4,304 | -4,304 | $10.47 |
| Capital V LLC | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 12,912 | -12,912 | $10.47 |
| MADDEN LARRY | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 425,822 | -2,814 | $10.69 |
| Vanderhook Timothy | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | $10.47 |
| Vanderhook Christopher | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -4,304 | $10.47 |
| Capital V LLC | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -12,912 | $10.47 |
| Vanderhook Christopher | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $11.03 |
| Vanderhook Timothy | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $11.03 |
| Capital V LLC | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $11.03 |
| Vanderhook Timothy | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 4,304 | -5,000 | $11.03 |
| Vanderhook Christopher | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 4,304 | -5,000 | $11.03 |
| Capital V LLC | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 12,912 | -15,000 | $11.03 |
| Vanderhook Timothy | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 3,196 | -3,196 | $11.70 |
| Vanderhook Timothy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.7.2026 | 12,500 | -12,500 | — |
| Vanderhook Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 12,500 | -12,500 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,557,610 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,309,194 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology