Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$67.04
▼ $0.35 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:35 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$28.24B
Day Range
$66.60 - $67.43
52-Week Range
$47.96 - $75.33
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.10.2026
Support
$65.66
Resistance
$75.33
CFG is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+25.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 27.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
+3.7%
Median 40D Outcome
58/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+5.8% … +13.2%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-7.5% … -2.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +4.0%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
9 occurrence(s) · 56% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.3% | +0.4% … +4.1% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.0% | -3.0% … +3.6% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +4.0% | -3.2% … +9.2% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.7% | -4.5% … +16.4% | +2.7% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +9.4% | -3.6% … +19.1% | +4.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-22 | 86/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.3% | -2.6% |
| 2020-01-31 | 85/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -10.6% | -40.2% |
| 2026-06-01 | 85/100 | Consolidation | +15.3% | +16.0% |
| 2018-05-30 | 84/100 | Consolidation | -2.2% | +1.5% |
| 2017-07-27 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -3.0% | +9.4% |
| 2026-05-15 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +9.5% | +21.4% |
| 2024-09-12 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +4.0% | +18.4% |
| 2025-11-17 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +17.0% | +31.0% |
| 2018-09-17 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -10.1% | -20.7% |
| 2025-02-25 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -4.8% | -10.7% |
| 2021-12-03 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +6.0% | +9.4% |
| 2021-06-22 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -3.5% | -4.1% |
| 2024-12-23 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +8.9% | -3.1% |
| 2024-06-11 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +12.5% | +19.8% |
| 2025-10-10 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +5.0% | +23.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
13d ago · $70.78
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -4 to 21 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 23, 2026
Then
51
$69.86
Now
51
$67.04
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
29
Risk
56
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING CFG...
Recent media coverage of Citizens Financial Group has focused on its strategic expansion in wealth management and financial restructuring. Notably, the firm announced plans to redeem all outstanding shares of its Series G preferred stock, signaling financial flexibility. Additionally, Citizens has been actively acquiring wealth management assets, including a $1 billion deal targeting advisors in Tampa, reinforcing its growth in the advisory sector. Analysts have also highlighted the company’s strong Q2 2026 earnings and its attractive valuation, including a 2.6% dividend yield.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Citizens Financial Group. News trend score: 62. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
60
Technical
29
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests traders are cautiously aligning with peers, as evidenced by the dominant herding score (56) and relative underperformance. The narrative gap (22) implies optimism may exceed tangible fundamentals, while anchoring near support (3.8%) hints at potential resistance to further declines. Euphoria (19) and overconfidence (2) signal mild overestimation, but FOMO (11) remains muted. The key question is whether traders will sustain herding behavior or pivot if momentum weakens further.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:23 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Citizens Keeps Up Wealth Push With $1B Tampa Duo — recruits $1B advisory team from Northern Trust"
"Citizens Financial to Redeem All Outstanding Shares of Series G Preferred Stock"
"strong 2Q26 growth, 16–18% ROTCE target, 13% P/B discount, and 2.6% yield"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 42/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value/cycle-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch’s high score and bullish verdict highlight its perceived growth potential, where the price allegedly hasn’t yet reflected underlying expansion—aligning with his ‘buy what you know’ philosophy. Meanwhile, defensive value investors like Benjamin Graham and Edgar Lawrence Smith see it as a long-term hold, scoring well due to its balance-sheet strength and potential for compounding, though Graham’s Enterprising Investor variant dismisses it as too expensive for risk-tolerant speculators. On the other end, market efficiency skeptics like Malkiel-Bogle and Fisher downgrade it, either because the stock lacks a clear edge over passive indexing or fails to meet Fisher’s bar for exceptional quality. Cycle analysts like Nelson and Marks (cycle) are cautiously optimistic, noting oversold conditions or mid-cycle positioning, while crowd psychology watchers like Mackay and Livermore warn of speculative bubbles or indecision. The contrast underscores whether CFG is a high-conviction growth bet or a speculative gamble—with value investors leaning in, while efficiency and trend-following models hold back.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 88
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 77
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 62
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 56
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 42
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
33.1%
Net Margin
25.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.0%
ROA
0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.90
Cash
$12.73B
Total Debt
$11.28B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.35
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.7.2026 | $0.460 |
| 29.7.2026 | $0.460 |
| 30.4.2026 | $0.460 |
| 29.4.2026 | $0.460 |
| 4.2.2026 | $0.460 |
| 3.2.2026 | $0.460 |
| 29.10.2025 | $0.460 |
| 28.10.2025 | $0.460 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.420 |
| 30.7.2025 | $0.420 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.420 |
| 29.4.2025 | $0.420 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$61.31
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$58.95
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 6 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Wealth Management · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Citizens Financial Group (CFG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CFG currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CFG's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 27.4%; Net income growth: 21.3%; Debt/equity: 0.35.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -2.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — CFG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boss Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 10,778 | -10,778 | $68.87 |
| Lillis Terrance | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 246.184 | +246.184 | — |
| Cummings Kevin | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 134.488 | +134.488 | — |
| ZURAITIS MARITA | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 268.751 | +268.751 | — |
| Alexander Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 162.168 | +162.168 | — |
| Atkinson Tracy A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 78.444 | +78.444 | — |
| Wade Claude E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 47.213 | +47.213 | — |
| Leary Robert G | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 208.392 | +208.392 | — |
| Swift Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 162.168 | +162.168 | — |
| Cumming Christine M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 268.751 | +268.751 | — |
| SIEKERKA MICHELE N | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 134.488 | +134.488 | — |
| KELLY EDWARD J III | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 246.184 | +246.184 | — |
| VAN SAUN BRUCE | Gift | 24.7.2026 | 17,500 | -17,500 | — |
| VAN SAUN BRUCE | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 129,369 | -129,369 | $72.07 |
| VAN SAUN BRUCE | Gift | 24.7.2026 | 20,850 | -20,850 | — |
| VAN SAUN BRUCE | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 1,140,763 | -129,369 | $72.07 |
| VAN SAUN BRUCE | Gift | 24.7.2026 | 1,119,913 | -20,850 | — |
| VAN SAUN BRUCE | Gift | 24.7.2026 | 1,102,413 | -17,500 | — |
| Stein Richard L. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 4,913 | -4,913 | $67.65 |
| Stein Richard L. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 84,633 | -4,913 | $67.65 |
| Atkinson Tracy A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 94.314 | +94.314 | — |
| KELLY EDWARD J III | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 295.988 | +295.988 | — |
| Wade Claude E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 56.764 | +56.764 | — |
| ZURAITIS MARITA | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 323.121 | +323.121 | — |
| Lillis Terrance | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 295.988 | +295.988 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,491,419 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 19,158,330 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology