Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$72.97
▼ $1.28 (-1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:24 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$5.30B
Day Range
$72.96 - $74.09
52-Week Range
$72.96 - $91.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$72.96
Resistance
$91.41
BYD is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-12.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $58.29 vs. price $72.97 (-20.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (43/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
58
Value
43
Momentum
14
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Boyd Gaming Corporation has primarily focused on its financial performance and analyst assessments. The company’s Q2 earnings were compared to its casino operator peers, with analysts evaluating its stock as part of broader consumer discretionary sector trends. Wolfe Research initiated coverage with a "Peer Perform" rating, suggesting moderate expectations, while general discussions highlighted its valuation as a potential value stock, though structural challenges in the industry were noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Boyd Gaming Corporation. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
62
Technical
14
Valuation
43
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 81) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.9% distance from support, likely due to recent price stability. The narrative gap (21) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations (narrativeScore 61) and subdued price action (realityScore 40). Overconfidence (27) and euphoria (23) are muted by weak momentum and valuation misalignment, while loss aversion (38) suggests hesitation amid declines. The key question remains whether traders will break free from the support anchor or hold, given the lack of extreme panic or FOMO signals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:22 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Earnings results often indicate what direction a company will take in the months ahead. With Q2 behind us, let’s have a look at Boyd Gaming (NYSE:BYD) and its peers."
"Wolfe Research analyst Peter Supino initiates coverage on Boyd Gaming (NYSE:BYD) with a Peer Perform rating."
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
BYD’s valuation and momentum split the historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing it as a high-conviction buy while others flagged it as a high-risk or overvalued bet. The top scorers—Samuel Armstrong Nelson, Peter Lynch, and Jack Schwager—highlighted its cyclical undervaluation, growth potential, and disciplined risk/reward setup, suggesting it fits their frameworks for speculative or growth-oriented plays. Meanwhile, the lower-scoring approaches, like those of Benjamin Graham, Walter Bagehot, and Jesse Livermore, dismissed it as either statistically overpriced, illiquid, or counter-trend, reflecting their emphasis on defensive metrics, liquidity, and trend alignment. The divide underscores how BYD’s volatility and growth narrative appeal to momentum-driven investors but clash with value and trend-following disciplines.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 84
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 46
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 39
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 18
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
18.3%
Net Margin
45.0%
EBITDA Margin
25.7%
ROE
70.7%
ROA
28.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$22.56
Cash
$353.41M
Total Debt
$2.05B
Current Ratio
0.54
Debt/Equity
0.78
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 15.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.180 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.180 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.180 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.180 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.180 |
| 15.6.2025 | $0.180 |
| 17.3.2025 | $0.180 |
| 16.3.2025 | $0.180 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$72.97
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$58.29
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-20.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8% | $407.10M | $373.49M |
| 2 | 4.2% | $424.30M | $357.12M |
| 3 | 3.6% | $439.78M | $339.59M |
| 4 | 3.1% | $453.30M | $321.13M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $464.64M | $301.98M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$388.46M
Terminal Value
$7.33B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.76B
Enterprise Value
$6.46B
Net Debt
$1.69B
Equity Value
$4.76B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$31.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.15
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Fintel · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockStory · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BYD currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BYD's estimated fair value is $58.29, which is 20.1% below the current price of $72.97. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BYD's technical score is 14/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 264.5%; Net income growth: 218.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $58.29 vs. price $72.97 (-20.1%); Current ratio: 0.54; Calmar: 0.19 (3y annualized return 4.8% / max drawdown 25.6%).
Yes — BYD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 1,611,671 | -12 | $82.00 |
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 12 | -12 | $82.00 |
| Hirsberg Josh | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 12,777 | -12,777 | $89.76 |
| Hirsberg Josh | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 422,969 | -12,777 | $89.76 |
| Andersen Stacia J.P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 2,043 | +2,043 | — |
| ROETH GEORGE C | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 2,043 | +2,043 | — |
| ROETH GEORGE C | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 2,043 | +2,043 | — |
| Andersen Stacia J.P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.7.2026 | 2,043 | +2,043 | — |
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 30,823 | -30,823 | $88.33 |
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 30,351 | +30,351 | — |
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,642,506 | +30,351 | — |
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 1,611,683 | -30,823 | $88.33 |
| Clinton Uri | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 3,468 | -3,468 | $87.69 |
| Clinton Uri | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 56,818 | -3,468 | $87.69 |
| SMITH KEITH | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | $85.90 |
| SMITH KEITH | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 996,981 | -100,000 | $85.90 |
| SPADAFOR CHRISTINE J. | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 1,237 | -1,237 | $80.91 |
| SPADAFOR CHRISTINE J. | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 8,757 | -1,237 | $80.91 |
| Thoman A. Randall | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | +2,347 | — |
| BOYD WILLIAM R | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | +2,347 | — |
| Hartmeier Michael A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | +2,347 | — |
| JOHNSON MARIANNE BOYD | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | -2,347 | — |
| Bailey John Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | +2,347 | — |
| SPADAFOR CHRISTINE J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | +2,347 | — |
| WHETSELL PAUL W | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,347 | +2,347 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,487,196 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,106,922 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology