Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$30.56
▲ $0.12 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:07 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$5.74B
Day Range
$30.55 - $31.56
52-Week Range
$29.93 - $50.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.12.2026
Support
$29.93
Resistance
$46.94
BIRK is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-31.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
37
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
13
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Birkenstock Holding plc has focused on its stock performance and investor interest. The company saw a rebound in shares after a dip, with investors reassessing its valuation amid strong earnings and revenue growth. Michael Burry’s significant stake purchase (5.2%) and long-term endorsement highlighted confidence in the brand. Analysts also noted Birkenstock’s affordable growth potential, solid margins, and reasonable valuation, though debt levels remain a consideration.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Birkenstock Holding plc. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
83
Fundamentals
—
Technical
13
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-32%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring (73) and near-equal loss aversion (72) suggest traders are fixated on the 1.4% support level, likely due to recent declines. The narrative gap (7 points) hints at a disconnect between positive sentiment (100/100) and technical weakness, creating potential tension. Key open questions include whether traders will hold near support or capitulate, given the lack of momentum or volume spikes. The absence of overconfidence or herding implies cautious, risk-averse behavior rather than aggressive positioning.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:30 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Birkenstock stock (NYSE:BIRK) jumped 6.6% in pre-market trading, staging a strong recovery from levels close to its 52-week low as investors reconsidered the footwear company’s valuation"
"Birkenstock (BIRK) offers affordable growth: strong EPS/revenue growth, below-market P/E, solid margins, but watch debt"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for this stock reveal a stark divide between cyclical and fundamental investors. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) both see potential, with Nelson’s high score suggesting the stock is near an oversold bottom and Marks’ verdict indicating an early-to-mid cycle phase—both signaling a favorable timing perspective. Meanwhile, more cautious or data-dependent approaches like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch can’t yet form a clear opinion due to insufficient fundamentals, while Walter Bagehot and Edgar Lawrence Smith echo this hesitation. On the opposite end, the lowest scores—from Morgan Housel, Jesse Livermore, and Thorstein Veblen—reflect deep skepticism: Housel flags volatility as a psychological deterrent, Livermore’s trend-following rules are violated, and Veblen’s critique implies growth is being pursued without substance. Even mixed or neutral verdicts (like Howard Marks’ general caution or Jack Schwager’s indecision) underscore a lack of consensus, leaving only a handful of methodologies with any constructive takeaway.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 27
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Fintel · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
TheStreet · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Stocktwits · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Stocktwits · 26.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for BIRK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
BIRK's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.5% of price; Calmar: -0.16 (3y annualized return -8.3% / max drawdown 52.8%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BIRK.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 23 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chu James Michael | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 28,146,226 | -28,146,226 | $39.18 |
| Bouyakhf Mehdi Nico | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $43.50 |
| Bouyakhf Mehdi Nico | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 31,153 | -30,000 | $43.50 |
| Bouyakhf Mehdi Nico | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $42.07 |
| Bouyakhf Mehdi Nico | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 61,153 | -60,000 | $42.07 |
| Pitcher Anne | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | -1,623 | — |
| Pitcher Anne | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 325 | -325 | $37.50 |
| Kennedy Ruth Anne Francis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | -1,623 | — |
| Pitcher Anne | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | +1,623 | — |
| Kennedy Ruth Anne Francis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 744 | -744 | $37.50 |
| Arnault Alexandre | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | -1,623 | — |
| Kennedy Ruth Anne Francis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | +1,623 | — |
| Kumar Nisha | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 690 | -690 | $37.50 |
| Kumar Nisha | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | +1,623 | — |
| Arnault Alexandre | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 690 | -690 | $37.50 |
| Kumar Nisha | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | -1,623 | — |
| Arnault Alexandre | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 1,623 | +1,623 | — |
| Kennedy Ruth Anne Francis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 7,228 | +1,623 | — |
| Kennedy Ruth Anne Francis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 6,484 | -744 | $37.50 |
| Kennedy Ruth Anne Francis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 0 | -1,623 | — |
| Kumar Nisha | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 3,437 | +1,623 | — |
| Kumar Nisha | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 2,747 | -690 | $37.50 |
| Kumar Nisha | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 0 | -1,623 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,500,123 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,857,909 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology