Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$25.94
▼ $0.56 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:06 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$25.79 - $26.47
52-Week Range
$22.61 - $31.92
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$24.90
Resistance
$29.69
BF.B is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
-5.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.40 (3y annualized return -25.6% / max drawdown 63.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
83/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+2.4%
Median 40D Outcome
72/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
67%
+2.1% … +7.8%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.3% … -0.2%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-7.5% … -2.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 67% (95% CI 42%–85%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
5 occurrence(s) · 40% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
6 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 80% (55%–93%) | +4.0% | +1.6% … +5.0% | +0.0% |
| 10D | 87% (62%–96%) | +3.8% | +1.4% … +5.3% | +0.2% |
| 20D | 67% (42%–85%) | +1.7% | -0.3% … +6.8% | +0.4% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.4% | -1.8% … +11.7% | +0.3% |
| 60D | 80% (55%–93%) | +4.8% | +3.1% … +9.1% | -0.5% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-09 | 83/100 | Downtrend | -0.4% | +14.7% |
| 2023-09-19 | 81/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -11.4% | -9.1% |
| 2021-03-25 | 81/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +11.8% | +7.4% |
| 2022-01-18 | 79/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -0.1% | +3.6% |
| 2023-01-09 | 79/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +1.7% | -2.7% |
| 2018-09-20 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -3.7% | -6.9% |
| 2022-10-21 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +9.2% | +3.1% |
| 2021-01-29 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +1.7% | +5.8% |
| 2019-01-25 | 77/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +6.7% | +16.2% |
| 2023-03-17 | 77/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +3.3% | +5.7% |
| 2022-03-09 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +6.4% | +3.0% |
| 2020-07-09 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +6.9% | +19.6% |
| 2021-08-25 | 75/100 | Downtrend | -1.2% | +4.8% |
| 2023-06-01 | 75/100 | Downtrend | +8.0% | +10.8% |
| 2026-06-04 | 74/100 | Downtrend | +1.1% | +4.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLP (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
26
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
13
Risk
42
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING BF.B...
Recent media coverage of Brown-Forman highlights leadership changes, with CEO Lawson Whiting announcing retirement amid weaker sales and operational challenges, particularly in core markets like Jack Daniel’s. The company reported mixed Q1 results—adjusted earnings met expectations but net sales fell 1% year-over-year due to declines in tequila, used barrels, and Korbel, though ready-to-drink (RTD) sales surged 20%. Weak spirits demand in developed markets, including Canada trade tensions, and a cautious outlook for fiscal 2027 dominated discussions, alongside modest organic growth and gross margin expansion. Investors are reassessing the company’s long-term direction amid broader market pressures.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Brown–Forman. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 6 vs. 6 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
11
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
72
Fundamentals
—
Technical
13
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by **herding**, as BF.B’s price move (+1.6%) closely tracks its peers (+1.3%), implying passive alignment rather than conviction. Low FOMO (score 12) and panic (score 18) scores suggest traders aren’t acting on urgency or distress, while neutral RSI (44) and muted volatility (0.94x ATR) reinforce a calm, consensus-driven environment. The key question is whether this herding reflects genuine fundamentals or simply a lack of divergent signals—given the narrow narrative-reality gap (-3), traders may be content with the status quo. The absence of extreme states (e.g., euphoria, panic) hints at a cautious, risk-averse herd rather than a speculative frenzy.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:57 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"sales are slowing as fewer Americans drink alcohol and trade tensions with Canada weigh on demand"
"CEO Lawson E. Whiting announced his retirement as the company faces weaker sales and operational pressures"
"RTD sales jump 20%"
"reiterated its guidance for fiscal 2027 organic sales on Wednesday as it f"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark divide between cyclical and fundamental investors. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both lean cautiously optimistic, with Nelson’s cycle analysis suggesting it’s near an oversold trough and Mackay finding no crowd-driven mania—implying a potential rebound or steady growth. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—from Graham’s valuation skepticism to Malkiel and Bogle’s efficient-market doubts—converge on skepticism, with scores hovering around the midpoint or lower, citing insufficient data or weak evidence for outperformance. The contrast is sharpest with Livermore and Housel, who flag the stock’s volatility and trend resistance, while Marks’ mixed verdict hints at a business with high expectations already priced in. The only outliers are Smith and Veblen, whose lack of decisive data or conflicting signals leave their models neutral, underscoring the stock’s ambiguity across different lenses.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after a decline, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of an accumulation phase.
Low confidence
$24.90
Range Bottom
$29.69
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $0.231 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.231 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.231 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.231 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.227 |
| 9.6.2025 | $0.227 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.227 |
| 6.12.2024 | $0.227 |
| 3.9.2024 | $0.218 |
| 7.6.2024 | $0.218 |
| 7.3.2024 | $0.218 |
| 30.11.2023 | $0.218 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 8 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Brown–Forman (BF.B) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for BF.B specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
BF.B's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.40 (3y annualized return -25.6% / max drawdown 63.9%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — BF.B has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology