Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$4.35
▲ $0.98 (+29.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:34 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/09/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$4.31 - $4.55
52-Week Range
$4.09 - $12.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$3.26
Resistance
$5.74
BBBY is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-64.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 74.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$14.09 vs. price $4.35 (-423.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
37
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
12
Risk
48
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
32
Institutional
80
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage regarding Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. focuses on the company's Q2 2026 financial performance and strategic
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.. News trend score: 44. Reason: 5 of the last 15 articles are negative, versus 4 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
32
Technical
12
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-41%
Market Narrative
35
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
-2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
BBBY’s market behavior suggests dominant **loss aversion**, as the stock’s 30.6% three-month drop and elevated volume reflect a reluctance to sell further into losses. The narrow narrative gap (-3) implies minimal misalignment between market sentiment and fundamentals, but the lack of euphoria or overconfidence signals cautious positioning. The key question is whether the recent +10.1% rally—contrasting with peers—will sustain or trigger profit-taking, given the underlying bearish momentum. Subdued volatility (0.81x ATR) suggests no panic, but the 8.6% distance from support may test resolve.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:17 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Bed Bath & Beyond shares are trading lower after reporting second-quarter financial results that missed Wall Street expectations."
"BBBY Q2: adjusted EPS -$0.53 vs -$0.27 expected, revenue $361.2M misses"
"reported quarterly losses of $(0.53) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.26)"
"Bed Bath & Beyond sees Q3 sales of $505.000 million-$525.000 million vs $574.500 million analyst estimate"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of the various investors, the model estimates that the very high scores from Charles Mackay, Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson stem from a shared emphasis on crowd sentiment and cycle position, leading them to view BBBY as relatively unsullied by mania and potentially oversold. In contrast, investors who prioritize quality, trend and liquidity—such as Philip Fisher, Jesse Livermore, Walter Bagehot, Gerald M. Loeb and Edgar Lawrence Smith—assign much lower scores, reflecting concerns about growth signatures, negative price trends and capital‑risk exposure. Mid‑range scores from Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch and the efficient‑market perspective capture a mixed view that acknowledges some discount or growth potential but also flags that the price may already embed much of that upside. Consequently, the divergence across methodologies is driven by each investor’s weighting of market psychology, cycle timing, intrinsic value versus risk factors.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 100
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 77
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 67
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 61
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
24.6%
Operating Margin
-5.9%
Net Margin
-8.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-38.9%
ROA
-19.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.41
Cash
$175.29M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.25
Debt/Equity
0.07
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$4.35
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$14.09
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-423.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-60.90M | $-55.87M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-59.00M | $-49.66M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-58.26M | $-44.99M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-58.63M | $-41.53M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-60.09M | $-39.06M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-64.11M
Terminal Value
$-947.60M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-615.87M
Enterprise Value
$-846.98M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-846.98M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.50
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 15 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
ChartMill · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
Yahoo · 15.7.2026
Yahoo · 14.7.2026
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (BBBY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 37/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BBBY currently scores 37/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BBBY's estimated fair value is -$14.09, which is 423.8% below the current price of $4.35. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BBBY's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 74.6%; Free cash flow growth: 66.0%; Net income growth: 67.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$14.09 vs. price $4.35 (-423.8%); Operating margin: -5.9% (negative); Net margin: -8.1% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BBBY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEMONIS MARCUS | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 23,094 | +23,094 | $4.30 |
| LEMONIS MARCUS | Open Market Purchase | 12.8.2026 | 736,232 | +23,094 | $4.30 |
| Shapiro Robert Jacob | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $4.51 |
| TABACCO JOSEPH J JR | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $4.57 |
| LaRose Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 388,889 | +388,889 | — |
| TABACCO JOSEPH J JR | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 58,379 | +20,000 | $4.57 |
| Shapiro Robert Jacob | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 70,107 | +3,000 | $4.51 |
| LaRose Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.8.2026 | 388,889 | +388,889 | — |
| LEMONIS MARCUS | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2026 | 43,382 | +43,382 | $4.67 |
| LEMONIS MARCUS | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2026 | 713,138 | +43,382 | $4.67 |
| Burkey Joanna M. | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 9,943 | -9,943 | $6.38 |
| Burkey Joanna M. | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 32,474 | -9,943 | $6.38 |
| Shapiro Robert Jacob | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | +26,873 | — |
| TABACCO JOSEPH J JR | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | +26,873 | — |
| TABACCO JOSEPH J JR | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | -26,873 | — |
| Perelman Debra Golding | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | -26,873 | — |
| Perelman Debra Golding | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | +26,873 | — |
| Burkey Joanna M. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | -26,873 | — |
| Nettles William Benjamin JR | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | -26,873 | — |
| Shapiro Robert Jacob | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | -26,873 | — |
| Burkey Joanna M. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | +26,873 | — |
| Nettles William Benjamin JR | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | +26,873 | — |
| Corbus Barclay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | -26,873 | — |
| Corbus Barclay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 26,873 | +26,873 | — |
| Ward Tamara | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 36,105 | +36,105 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,384,567 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 14,617,058 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology