Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$156.45
▲ $3.05 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/17 12:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$7.95B
Day Range
$151.00 - $157.75
52-Week Range
$135.20 - $417.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
07.12.2026
AVAV is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-37.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 140.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$80.43 vs. price $156.45 (-151.4%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
50
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
31
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has primarily centered on its upcoming **Q2 earnings report**, with investors anticipating significant financial movements. Headlines highlight market expectations of a major earnings shift, though no substantive details about the company’s performance or specific results are provided. The focus remains speculative, tied to pre-earnings speculation rather than confirmed developments. No other notable company-specific news is evident in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AeroVironment, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
31
Technical
50
Valuation
38
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The data suggests a mixed but *dominant* psychological tension between **panic selling** (highest score) and **loss aversion**, driven by prolonged declines and elevated volume. The narrative gap (10 points) hints at a disconnect between market sentiment (positive) and technical reality (weak momentum). Key open question: Will traders exit further due to losses, or will sentiment-driven buying stabilize the decline? The absence of herding or euphoria reinforces cautious, risk-averse behavior.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Aerospace and defense company AeroVironment (NASDAQ:AVAV) will be reporting earnings this Wednesday afternoon. Here’s what investors should know."
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with the highest scores from technical and defensive value investors clashing against the lowest from contrarian and market-efficiency frameworks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Benjamin Graham’s defensive approach both see strong potential—Nelson’s cycle analysis flags it as oversold, while Graham’s valuation metrics make it attractive to cautious investors. Meanwhile, Walter Bagehot and Charles Mackay’s liquidity and crowd psychology checks reinforce a more stable, less speculative case. However, the opposite end of the spectrum—from Jesse Livermore’s trend-following skepticism to Thorstein Veblen’s warning about speculative growth chasing—suggests the stock may lack momentum or fundamental depth. Even Peter Lynch and the efficient-market duo see it as overpriced or unworthy of active picking, while Philip Fisher’s absence of signature quality/growth traits further dampens enthusiasm. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s technical or valuation tailwinds outweigh its perceived overvaluation or speculative risks.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 85
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 54
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 45
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 27
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.3%
Operating Margin
-15.7%
Net Margin
-13.4%
EBITDA Margin
-2.3%
ROE
-6.0%
ROA
-4.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$5.40
Cash
$377.32M
Total Debt
$728.97M
Current Ratio
4.30
Debt/Equity
0.17
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$156.45
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$80.43
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-151.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-176.19M | $-161.64M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-210.32M | $-177.02M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-239.24M | $-184.74M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-258.68M | $-183.25M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-265.15M | $-172.33M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-140.95M
Terminal Value
$-4.18B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-2.72B
Enterprise Value
$-3.60B
Net Debt
$351.64M
Equity Value
$-3.95B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$89.64
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$19.90
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AVAV currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AVAV's estimated fair value is -$80.43, which is 151.4% below the current price of $156.45. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AVAV's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 140.9%; Debt/equity: 0.17; Current ratio: 4.30.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$80.43 vs. price $156.45 (-151.4%); Operating margin: -15.7% (negative); Net margin: -13.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AVAV.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGE STEPHEN F | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $191.98 |
| Shackley Brian Charles | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 205 | -205 | $201.86 |
| Shackley Brian Charles | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 7,888 | -205 | $201.86 |
| Shackley Brian Charles | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 300 | -300 | $143.00 |
| PAGE STEPHEN F | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 248 | -248 | $143.00 |
| PAGE STEPHEN F | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 48,753 | -248 | $143.00 |
| Shackley Brian Charles | Open Market Sale | 15.7.2026 | 8,093 | -300 | $143.00 |
| MULLER EDWARD R | Other Transaction | 13.7.2026 | 996 | -996 | — |
| MULLER EDWARD R | Other Transaction | 13.7.2026 | 996 | +996 | — |
| MULLER EDWARD R | Other Transaction | 13.7.2026 | 2,148 | -996 | — |
| MULLER EDWARD R | Other Transaction | 13.7.2026 | 49,691 | +996 | — |
| Stevenson Trace E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 545 | -545 | $144.58 |
| Brown Melissa Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 813 | -813 | $144.58 |
| Shackley Brian Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 243 | -243 | $144.58 |
| Woodward Sean Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 236 | -236 | $144.58 |
| Nawabi Wahid | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 5,246 | -5,246 | $144.58 |
| McDaniel Clum Mary Elizabeth | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 58 | -58 | $144.58 |
| Nawabi Wahid | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 162,200 | -5,246 | $144.58 |
| Brown Melissa Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 26,085 | -813 | $144.58 |
| Shackley Brian Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 8,483 | -243 | $144.58 |
| Stevenson Trace E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 9,823 | -545 | $144.58 |
| McDaniel Clum Mary Elizabeth | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 16,571 | -58 | $144.58 |
| Woodward Sean Thomas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 5,836 | -236 | $144.58 |
| PAGE STEPHEN F | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 130 | +130 | — |
| Long Mary Beth | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 1,047 | +1,047 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,304,654 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,324,935 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology