Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$36.10
▼ $0.15 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:59 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$3.02B
Day Range
$36.10 - $36.46
52-Week Range
$36.10 - $43.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$36.10
Resistance
$43.10
AVA is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
-0.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$25.26 vs. price $36.10 (-170.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
9
Risk
48
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
49
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Avista Corporation has primarily focused on its **dividend stability and financial updates**, including the declaration of a common stock dividend and its status as a Dividend Champion. The company also filed **annual rate adjustments for Washington customers**, proposing lower natural gas bills for winter while keeping electric rates nearly unchanged. Additionally, there were reports on **leadership changes**, such as new vice president appointments, and a review of its **Q2 2026 earnings call**, though no major operational shifts were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Avista Corporation. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
49
Technical
9
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (71) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.5% support level, likely due to its proximity. Loss aversion (19) hints at lingering reluctance to accept deeper losses, while herding (44) suggests relative underperformance may attract cautious buyers. The narrative gap (7) implies a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but no extreme bias dominates. The key question remains whether traders will hold near support or break below it, given the mixed signals of stability (low volatility) and underperformance (peer lag).
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:18 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Avista Corp. Board Declares Common Stock Dividend (GlobeNewswire, article 8)"
"2026 Q2 earnings call presentation and summary (SeekingAlpha, articles 5, 7, 10)"
"natural gas customers see lower bills under rate adjustment requests (GlobeNewswire, articles 2, 3)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for this stock split sharply between bullish and cautious camps, reflecting starkly different priorities. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd-behavior analysis, Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle positioning, and Jack Schwager’s disciplined setup—all suggest a favorable opportunity, emphasizing either the absence of speculative frenzy, a cyclical tailwind, or a high-probability trade setup. Conversely, the lowest scorers, like Walter Bagehot and Philip Fisher, flagged liquidity risks and a lack of quality/growth traits, respectively, while Peter Lynch and the efficient-market theorists dismissed it outright as either unprofitable or unselectable over an index. The middle tier—from Howard Marks to Benjamin Graham—landed on cautious optimism, balancing risk pricing and cyclical timing against mixed fundamental signals, illustrating a spectrum from ‘holdable’ to ‘not obviously cheap.’
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 81
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 70
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 67
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 35
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 33
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 28
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
18.0%
Net Margin
9.8%
EBITDA Margin
32.7%
ROE
7.1%
ROA
2.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.38
Cash
$19.00M
Total Debt
$388.00M
Current Ratio
0.83
Debt/Equity
0.14
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.8.2026 | $0.493 |
| 19.5.2026 | $0.493 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.493 |
| 25.2.2026 | $0.493 |
| 24.2.2026 | $0.493 |
| 24.11.2025 | $0.490 |
| 23.11.2025 | $0.490 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.490 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.490 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.490 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.490 |
| 26.2.2025 | $0.490 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$36.10
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$25.26
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-170.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8% | $-105.85M | $-97.11M |
| 2 | 4.2% | $-110.33M | $-92.86M |
| 3 | 3.7% | $-114.36M | $-88.31M |
| 4 | 3.1% | $-117.88M | $-83.51M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-120.82M | $-78.53M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-101.00M
Terminal Value
$-1.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.24B
Enterprise Value
$-1.68B
Net Debt
$369.00M
Equity Value
$-2.05B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$33.42
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$32.78
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
Moby · 4.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 3.8.2026
MarketBeat · 3.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.8.2026
MT Newswires · 3.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Avista Corporation (AVA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AVA currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AVA's estimated fair value is -$25.26, which is 170.0% below the current price of $36.10. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AVA's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.7% of price; Debt/equity: 0.14.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$25.26 vs. price $36.10 (-170.0%); Current ratio: 0.83; Calmar: 0.14 (3y annualized return 2.2% / max drawdown 16.2%).
Yes — AVA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiLuciano Joshua D | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 3,857 | -3,857 | $37.24 |
| DiLuciano Joshua D | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 818 | -818 | $37.25 |
| STANLEY HEIDI B | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| Philipps Jeffry L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| Widmann Janet D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| Kwawu Sena M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| Maw Scott Harlan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| MORRIS SCOTT L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| Bentz Julie A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| Jacobsen Kevin B | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| BURKE DONALD C | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| KLEIN REBECCA A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 44 | +44 | $37.16 |
| MEYER DAVID J | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 44.66 | -44.66 | $40.98 |
| MEYER DAVID J | Other Transaction | 15.6.2026 | 3,662 | -45 | $40.98 |
| MEYER DAVID J | Other Transaction | 15.5.2026 | 45.32 | -45.32 | $40.41 |
| MEYER DAVID J | Other Transaction | 15.5.2026 | 2,618 | -45 | $40.41 |
| Thackston Jason R | Gift | 14.5.2026 | 3,210 | -3,210 | $41.16 |
| Thackston Jason R | Gift | 14.5.2026 | 41,578 | -3,210 | $41.16 |
| KLEIN REBECCA A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
| Maw Scott Harlan | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
| Bentz Julie A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
| Jacobsen Kevin B | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
| BURKE DONALD C | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
| Kwawu Sena M | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
| Widmann Janet D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 3,538 | +3,538 | $40.98 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,341,954 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,383,385 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology