Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$54.99
▲ $0.17 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 09:54 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$54.47 - $55.39
52-Week Range
$18.12 - $57.62
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$40.31
Resistance
$57.62
ANDG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+134.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 21.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -16.1% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
57
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
55
Risk
62
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
33
Institutional
88
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Andersen Group Inc. has centered on its stock performance and analyst upgrades. Multiple reports highlight Baird and other analysts raising their price targets—from $57 to $64—while maintaining an "Outperform" rating, driving a 3% stock increase. The company’s recent follow-on equity raise of $188.5 million and strong year-to-date gains (105.74%) have also sparked valuation discussions. Analysts are examining whether the stock’s momentum aligns with its market positioning amid broader finance sector comparisons.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Andersen Group Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
33
Technical
55
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+48%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ANDG is consistent with **euphoric overconfidence**, where extreme momentum (+25% ROC), extreme sentiment (98/100), and detached valuation (+43.8% above 200-day avg) dominate. FOMO and anchoring reinforce this, as traders chase gains near resistance while ignoring fundamental misalignment. The massive narrative gap (51-point disparity) suggests traders are prioritizing price action over reality. The key open question: *Will traders sustain euphoria despite the widening gap between price and fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Baird increased its price target on the stock to $64 from $57 while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating"
"Andersen Group (ANDG) has completed a follow-on equity offering of $188.5 million in Class A common stock"
"share price return is up 30.22% over 90 days and 105.74% year to date"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 26/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some seeing clear opportunities while others flag serious red flags. Benjamin Graham’s Defensive Investor approach scores highly (87), suggesting a disciplined valuation play, though his Enterprising Investor framework lacks sufficient data to form a verdict. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Jesse Livermore (82) and even Walter Bagehot (67) lean positive, emphasizing price momentum or liquidity as strengths. However, growth-focused investors like Philip Fisher (41) and Peter Lynch (58) are far more cautious, noting that the stock’s price already reflects its potential gains, leaving little upside surprise. At the opposite end, behavioral economists like Charles Mackay (9) and Samuel Nelson (8) warn of speculative excess, while cycle analysts like Howard Marks (27) and Thorstein Veblen (30) see it as a late-stage or speculative bet—patterns they’d avoid. The contrast highlights whether the stock is a disciplined value play or a speculative bubble, depending on whether one prioritizes fundamentals, trends, or market psychology.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 87
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 67
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 66
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 58
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 56
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 51
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 50
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 41
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 30
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 189 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-16.1%
Net Margin
-0.3%
EBITDA Margin
-15.1%
ROE
1.7%
ROA
-0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$250.28M
Total Debt
$350.08M
Current Ratio
2.10
Debt/Equity
-2.60
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Fintel · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
Business Wire · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
Andersen Group Inc. (ANDG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ANDG currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ANDG's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 21.3%; Debt/equity: -2.60; Current ratio: 2.10.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -16.1% (negative); Net margin: -0.3% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ANDG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 14 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 20 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durable Capital Partners LP | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 336,736 | -336,736 | $40.01 |
| Durable Capital Partners LP | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 1,333,749 | -336,736 | $40.01 |
| Gunderson Robert V JR | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 2,367 | +2,367 | $35.82 |
| Gunderson Robert V JR | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 15,000 | +2,367 | $35.82 |
| Vorsatz Mark Lawrence | Gift | 2.2.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | — |
| Vorsatz Mark Lawrence | Gift | 2.2.2026 | 200,000 | -200,000 | — |
| Vorsatz Mark Lawrence | Gift | 2.2.2026 | 5,000,000 | -200,000 | — |
| Vorsatz Mark Lawrence | Gift | 2.2.2026 | 2,000,000 | +200,000 | — |
| Gunderson Robert V JR | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 12,633 | +12,633 | $16.00 |
| Nicolai John | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 9,475 | +9,475 | $16.00 |
| OLSON RONALD L | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 7,896 | +7,896 | $16.00 |
| JOYCE JOHN R | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 10,422 | +10,422 | $16.00 |
| JOYCE JOHN R | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 10,422 | +10,422 | $16.00 |
| OLSON RONALD L | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 7,896 | +7,896 | $16.00 |
| Gunderson Robert V JR | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 12,633 | +12,633 | $16.00 |
| Nicolai John | Open Market Purchase | 18.12.2025 | 9,475 | +9,475 | $16.00 |
| Durable Capital Partners LP | Open Market Purchase | 17.12.2025 | 107,985 | +107,985 | $21.36 |
| Durable Capital Partners LP | Open Market Purchase | 17.12.2025 | 250,000 | +250,000 | $20.59 |
| Durable Capital Partners LP | Open Market Purchase | 17.12.2025 | 1,562,500 | +250,000 | $20.59 |
| Durable Capital Partners LP | Open Market Purchase | 17.12.2025 | 1,670,485 | +107,985 | $21.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,088,950 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,863,529 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology