Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$23.70
▲ $0.84 (+3.7%)
Market data updated: 09/18 09:00 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$23.30 - $24.54
52-Week Range
$18.38 - $44.93
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
AMRC is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-18.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $46.46 vs. price $23.70 (+96.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
59
Risk
40
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
42
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ameresco, Inc. highlights insider buying activity, including purchases totaling nearly $1.9 million by executives and directors amid a stock decline, raising speculation about potential future gains. The company also announced leadership changes, such as Paolo Formica’s appointment as CEO of its subsidiary Enerqos to drive growth in energy efficiency and decarbonization in Italy. Additionally, Ameresco broke ground on a renewable natural gas facility in Nebraska, signaling expansion in sustainable energy projects. Overall, themes include investor caution, leadership shifts, and strategic investments in clean energy.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ameresco, Inc.. News trend score: 44. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 4 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
42
Technical
59
Valuation
62
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-17%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-5
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AMRC’s market behavior suggests investors are heavily influenced by loss aversion, consistent with a prolonged decline (-18.7% in three months) and muted trading activity. The narrative gap (-20) further implies a disconnect between market sentiment (optimistic) and reality (underperformance), reinforcing caution. Herding is present but secondary, as the stock briefly outperformed peers today. The key question is whether volume or momentum will break the subdued trend—currently, no clear catalyst is visible. Overconfidence and euphoria are absent, reinforcing a risk-averse stance.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:10 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ameresco insiders have been buying into a steep decline... CEO George Sakellaris accounted for approximately $574,000 across several purchases."
"Ameresco celebrates the groundbreaking of Neogenyx Fuels' first agricultural renewable natural gas facility in Nebraska."
"Enerqos, an Ameresco company, appoints Paolo Formica as CEO to support growth in Italy and advance energy efficiency."
"Ameresco stock has delivered a steeply negative 5 year return... yet the current valuation checks suggest pricing in line with the broader market."
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AMRC reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market positioning. Charles Mackay’s near-perfect score suggests no crowd-driven mania, while Jesse Livermore’s abysmal 14 flags a clear trend violation—highlighting how contrarian timing clashes with speculative caution. Meanwhile, Fisher, Smith, and Marks lean bullish, praising quality, cycle positioning, and risk pricing, but Graham’s mixed verdict and the efficient-market camp’s neutral stance question whether the stock’s merits justify active selection over passive indexing. Even among growth-focused investors like Lynch and Veblen, the debate splits on whether the stock’s price already reflects its potential or if hidden value remains, underscoring how subjective metrics like 'exceptional quality' or 'moderate holdability' can yield wildly different conclusions.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 83
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 82
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 67
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 25
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
14.5%
Operating Margin
6.1%
Net Margin
3.2%
EBITDA Margin
11.2%
ROE
5.6%
ROA
1.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.08
Cash
$108.52M
Total Debt
$149.36M
Current Ratio
1.46
Debt/Equity
0.15
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$23.70
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$46.46
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+96.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
18.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.1% | $133.77M | $122.72M |
| 2 | 14.2% | $152.72M | $128.54M |
| 3 | 10.3% | $168.42M | $130.05M |
| 4 | 6.4% | $179.18M | $126.94M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $183.66M | $119.37M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$113.31M
Terminal Value
$2.90B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.88B
Enterprise Value
$2.51B
Net Debt
$40.85M
Equity Value
$2.47B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$19.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 11 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 30.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 30.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Motley Fool · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Motley Fool · 29.8.2026
Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMRC currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMRC's estimated fair value is $46.46, which is 96.1% above the current price of $23.70. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMRC's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $46.46 vs. price $23.70 (+96.1%); Revenue growth (last year): 28.8%; Free cash flow growth: 249.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.1% of price; Calmar: -0.23 (3y annualized return -18.4% / max drawdown 80.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -8.5%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AMRC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 24 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $22.13 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 1,010,597 | +4,000 | $22.84 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 4,000 | +4,000 | $22.84 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 1,006,597 | +1,000 | $21.92 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $21.92 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 1,005,597 | +4,062 | $22.03 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 1,001,535 | +938 | $21.60 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 4,062 | +4,062 | $22.03 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 25.8.2026 | 938 | +938 | $21.60 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 1,000,597 | +5,000 | $20.91 |
| Sutton Joseph W. | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 80,246 | +9,700 | $20.87 |
| Miller Jennifer L | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 34,546 | +2,000 | $20.96 |
| Miller Jennifer L | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $20.96 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $20.91 |
| Sutton Joseph W. | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 9,700 | +9,700 | $20.87 |
| Cox Brian C | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 44,325 | +4,625 | $21.64 |
| Cox Brian C | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 4,625 | +4,625 | $21.64 |
| Corrsin David J | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | — |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 995,597 | +1,000 | $25.90 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $25.90 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 994,597 | +1,000 | $25.27 |
| Cox Brian C | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 39,700 | +39,700 | $25.07 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $25.27 |
| Cox Brian C | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 39,700 | +39,700 | $25.07 |
| Sakellaris George P | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 993,597 | +5,000 | $25.95 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,986,733 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,479,520 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
75.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology