Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$3.40
▼ $0.00 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:28 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$102.15M
Day Range
$3.34 - $3.47
52-Week Range
$1.64 - $10.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$3.20
Resistance
$7.65
-17.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 165.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$11.79 vs. price $3.40 (-446.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
42
Risk
46
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
36
Institutional
29
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **AmpliTech Group, Inc.** highlights its strong growth in high-tech communications sectors, particularly in **5G and satellite technologies**. The company has secured **$7.3 million in follow-on O-RAN 5G orders** from an Asian mobile network operator, reinforcing its momentum in open radio access networks. Additionally, its **AGMDC division won three competitive contracts** for advanced phased-array satellite communications components, showcasing expertise in custom GaAs MMIC solutions. AmpliTech also reported a **51% sequential revenue increase in Q2 2026**, positioning it well amid the expanding **global Open RAN and quantum computing markets**. Upcoming participation in the **Moody Capital Solutions conference** further underscores its industry presence.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Amplitech Group, Inc.. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 8 vs. 8 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
6
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
36
Technical
42
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-62%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+5
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AMPG’s dominant loss aversion—driven by a 52.9% three-month drop—suggests investors are prioritizing damage control over speculative bets. The muted volume (0.39x average) aligns with risk aversion, while overconfidence (price vs. EPS growth) hints at selective optimism. The narrative gap (13 points) implies perceptions may still lag reality, but the data suggests traders are cautious rather than aggressive. The key question: *Will the recent outperformance (+5.8%) lure in buyers, or will loss aversion persist as a drag?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$7.3M follow-on O-RAN 5G orders from Asian MNO"
"Three competitive design wins for advanced phased-array satellite communications"
"$17M backlog and over $17M in ORAN shipments"
"Positioned for surging global Open RAN market"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and bearish camps, reflecting starkly different priorities. Howard Marks’ *Market Cycle* and Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology frameworks both rate AMPG highly (93 and 92), seeing it as a mid-cycle opportunity without manic speculation—suggesting a contrarian or cyclical investor’s playbook would lean in. Conversely, the Grahamite approaches (scoring 39–40) and the efficient-market view (33) dismiss it outright, arguing the stock lacks defensive value or statistical cheapness, while Fisher (33) and Veblen (12) reject it for lacking quality or growth fundamentals. Meanwhile, trend-followers like Livermore (42) and Loeb (31) flag it as a red flag, while patient, volatility-averse investors like Housel (0) would avoid it entirely. The divide underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in cyclical positioning (Marks, Mackay) or whether its risks—liquidity (Bagehot), volatility (Housel), or lack of intrinsic merit (Graham)—override any tactical opportunity.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 97
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 84
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 70
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 61
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 55
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 39
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
23.9%
Operating Margin
-29.0%
Net Margin
-27.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-21.3%
ROA
-13.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.33
Cash
$4.98M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.68
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.40
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$11.79
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-446.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-12.12M | $-11.12M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-14.47M | $-12.18M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-16.46M | $-12.71M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-17.80M | $-12.61M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-18.25M | $-11.86M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-9.70M
Terminal Value
$-287.73M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-187.00M
Enterprise Value
$-247.49M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-247.49M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.95
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 4 neutral, 8 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
TMX Newsfile · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 18.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.8.2026
Benzinga · 15.8.2026
ChartMill · 14.8.2026
ChartMill · 14.8.2026
ChartMill · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Amplitech Group, Inc. (AMPG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMPG currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMPG's estimated fair value is -$11.79, which is 446.8% below the current price of $3.40. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMPG's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 165.0%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 68.3%; Net income growth: 37.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$11.79 vs. price $3.40 (-446.8%); Operating margin: -29.0% (negative); Net margin: -27.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AMPG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maqbool Fawad | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 7,247 | +7,247 | $3.45 |
| Maqbool Fawad | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $3.53 |
| Maqbool Fawad | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 500 | +500 | $5.00 |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $5.00 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| Maqbool Fawad | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 500 | -500 | — |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $5.00 |
| Maqbool Fawad | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 2,714,364 | +500 | $5.00 |
| Maqbool Fawad | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 0 | -500 | — |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 238,743 | +1,000 | $5.00 |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 0 | -1,000 | — |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 77,000 | +1,000 | $5.00 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.7.2026 | 0 | -1,000 | — |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Open Market Sale | 23.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $7.71 |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Open Market Sale | 23.6.2026 | 237,743 | -10,000 | $7.71 |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 7,157 | -7,157 | $8.46 |
| Mazziota Daniel Richard | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 247,743 | -7,157 | $8.46 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | — |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $3.88 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $5.36 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $3.52 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 81,000 | +5,000 | $3.88 |
| Flores Jorge Luis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 106,000 | +25,000 | $3.52 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,310,840 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,323,586 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology